Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Feedback
View Statistics
Members
Current visitors
Buy Sell Trade
WTB
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Forums
The Social Lounge
General Talk
Technology Risks to EVM?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="blr_p" data-source="post: 2523945" data-attributes="member: 10952"><p>Read the judgement starting from clause 17 which gets into a lot of technical details. I'm amazed they took the trouble to get into it.</p><p></p><p>The judgement is an excellent answer to doubters.</p><p></p><p></p><p>It's providing sources and ammo to counter doubters. Have been doing it since 2008 <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>All official sources with the weight of a government to back them. Can't do better than that really</p><p></p><p></p><p>You're not serious just sloganeering. Until you read and then challenge that is, where you remain</p><p></p><p>We can dispose off your transparency/source code issue</p><p></p><p>Four for four <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Not true</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]196104[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>26 cases. Not one valid complaint. The court is right to uphold 49MA. Otherwise the number would have run into several hundred. Causing unnecessary FUD at the cost of the tax payer.</p><p></p><p>My turn to lol if you think it's possible to silence Indians from saying anything <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p>Nine times out of ten the motive to claim miscount is attention seeking. Publicity is expensive. As a candidate if you can co-opt the media to do it on your behalf nothing like it. This rule acts as a sufficient deterrent to such mischief.</p><p></p><p>See above. We have different concerns in India and what works best n the US might not be applicable here no matter how much I would like it to be. So it's not a question of being blindsided but working with the constraints of reality. It's easy to be idealist but if there is no scope to realise those ideas then what is the point. Many times I've argued why things couldn't be like how they are in the US and disagree that we could not have it like that here.</p><p></p><p>But on this subject of voting, does the US really have a system to envy given their recent record?</p><p></p><p>I'd contend not. In fact I'd be wary of people slamming our system coming from countries that never tried EVM's or have limited experience or failed at it. We have experience of both types and EVM's are demonstrably superior. I find disingenuous people saying paper is better when that's the only system they are familiar with.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="blr_p, post: 2523945, member: 10952"] Read the judgement starting from clause 17 which gets into a lot of technical details. I'm amazed they took the trouble to get into it. The judgement is an excellent answer to doubters. It's providing sources and ammo to counter doubters. Have been doing it since 2008 :) All official sources with the weight of a government to back them. Can't do better than that really You're not serious just sloganeering. Until you read and then challenge that is, where you remain We can dispose off your transparency/source code issue Four for four :) Not true [ATTACH type="full" alt="49MA.png"]196104[/ATTACH] 26 cases. Not one valid complaint. The court is right to uphold 49MA. Otherwise the number would have run into several hundred. Causing unnecessary FUD at the cost of the tax payer. My turn to lol if you think it's possible to silence Indians from saying anything :D Nine times out of ten the motive to claim miscount is attention seeking. Publicity is expensive. As a candidate if you can co-opt the media to do it on your behalf nothing like it. This rule acts as a sufficient deterrent to such mischief. See above. We have different concerns in India and what works best n the US might not be applicable here no matter how much I would like it to be. So it's not a question of being blindsided but working with the constraints of reality. It's easy to be idealist but if there is no scope to realise those ideas then what is the point. Many times I've argued why things couldn't be like how they are in the US and disagree that we could not have it like that here. But on this subject of voting, does the US really have a system to envy given their recent record? I'd contend not. In fact I'd be wary of people slamming our system coming from countries that never tried EVM's or have limited experience or failed at it. We have experience of both types and EVM's are demonstrably superior. I find disingenuous people saying paper is better when that's the only system they are familiar with. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
The Social Lounge
General Talk
Technology Risks to EVM?
Top
Bottom