I know people who have and regretted not getting in earlier.
this is paywalled, mind sharing a non paywalled link?
Cāmon Eddy, whatās with this āgotchaā kind of post ![]()
But if the retail investorās wealth is the primary concern of this thread, Iād say Adani is in a much better position than something such as, say, Reliance Power.
Iād even go so far as to say now that theyāve become this big, they fall into the category of ātoo big to failā companies, ala the Korean Cheabols.
And Iām not a stocks guy (prefer the passiveness of MF investing) but all friends who are, continue to remain bullish on Adani.
The freefloat of ADANIENT is much less than any other company, was the primary reason for higher price demand vs supply. same way it went down fast too.
Also retail is not invested there in huge numbers. institutions are the primary investors. FII Still holds the largest chunk, Even after such panic situation.
Next Earnings date is 3rd of May, Let it come and whoever want to do fresh investment can make descission based on the outcome. Can check out how they faired after such drastic rout in the market.
I think if the company is robust then same news canāt bring the company to down everytime. After June it will do better⦠hopefully.
Imagine spending your free time defending a mutlibillion dollar corporation cause they are bankrolling a political party that you like.
Either one of those things would be sad as hell as a stand alone. Put together? I cant even⦠lol
not been following this much but had heard that adani corp has/is going to take it up legally against the āhindon riverā firm (in America or India, dont know). but the only 2 out of the 20 companies which have been targetted earlier by the firm and who pursued this legally in the US (except for ebix who is pursuing it in India & Hindenberg has not made any appearance here yet), one of them being Indiaās āEros Intlā & the other a Chinese infra company, failed to make the case against the firm as in both the instances the latter was let-off by US courts saying that there were no legit legal grounds there as the firm had submitted that its reports were its āmere opinionsā & not factual findings/allegations (taking cover behind āwe think/we believeā kind-of wordplay). how would adaniās case stand then? remains to be seen..
Not at all, most of the things we do on this forum can be classified as an āunproductive spend of timeā. No need to feel sorry for anyone.
To borrow a line from Ted Lasso, it helps to be curious, not judgmental. Iāve learned much more since adopting that attitude, instead of seeing things in black and white and rushing to judgments.
A far more pertinent question to ask would be when would Adani seek legal action against Hindenburg.
Since the hypothesis here is that the Gov is on cohorts with the group then not much can be expected on that front in India. So this anyway ties up with what you would expect if said hypothesis is true.
However, if the allegations in the report are indeed false, you can bet that the group would challenge these allegations and present proof that demonstrates otherwise.
**This simple act would not only destroy Hindenburg, it would make the market valuation of the group companies jump up massively **- maybe even to as much as what they were in December 2022.
The Adani group has every possible , and incredibly large incentive to challenge Hindenburg with clear proof.
And this should be very straightforward if the books are indeed clean.
So the million dollar, no make that 100 billion dollar question is - when and if this would happen.
Adani handled this very poorly from a PR point of view. I donāt see any way for them to tide over this except to actually tide over this.
this is a good writeup here (but viewable only under a payplan):
Could you please elaborate on how the return would be 30%?
I have been trying to figure out how they made money off of this, there are some vague claims of creating a single product derivative of our indices in news articles, but havenāt found anything concrete yet.
You do realise this is a battle of PR, right? Not a legal battle where the court needs to be convinced of Adaniās case, where the question of right or wrong comes in. Adani has already lost the perception battle with its poor handling of the allegations. They probably realise this. The groupās value tanked on the basis of mere allegations. Would it make sense for them to pursue this further, given the perception hit theyāve already taken? Donāt look at it from the right/wrong pov, but rather from the practicality pov.
No, the PR battle is being fought in India for the perception in the general publicās mind.
The markets simply do not care much for PR ..
Retail investors may care for it to some extent but given the extremely low retail float of group shares (and the almost negligible contribution of B2C revenues), it is completely irrelevant in this particular case
Adani group or any other major conglomerate will be friendly with all governments. He is spotted with leaders of all parties. Whichever way the wind blows, he will blow money there.
I would not say that adani group has no major projects in last 5-10 years, they have massive portfolio companies. AWL is a house hold brand, and ACC cement which they acquired recently is massive too. They manage/own many airports in india, and also have many construction undertakings, limited to western part of the country.
Disagree mate. The PR damage wiped off those billions off of Adani stocks. Institutional investors have largely stayed put and if not overtly supportive, havenāt joined in the sell-off.
I also donāt see Adani having any trouble raising more money locally. That support by banks and institutional investors such as LIC in itself acts as tacit backing of the govt (you can debate the merit of a govt doing so, but thatād be a different matter).
Given this situation, what incentive does Adani have in actively engaging with Hindenburgās allegations! That said, Iām sure this isnāt the last weāve heard on this. Adani will go after Hindenburg, but just not in the way we think it should right now.
LOL , please go check the holding pattern for the group companies.
The retail investor stake - e.g. in the flagship group was 1.6% prior to the fiasco.
So per your argument , this 1.6% holding group got so spooked by just ineffective PR that they caused the entire market cap to drop by over 60% in a quarter?
How , even, ?:wideyed:
They cannot offload large quantity in most Adani companies right now. No buyers for such large quantities in Adani Total Gas, Adani Transmission, Adani Green and Adani Power. You can check the volume during this fiasco and the quantity large institutions are holding.
Take Adani Total Gas for example. As per the shareholding pattern ending December 2022 quarter, LIC holds 6,55,88,170 shares or 5.96 per cent stake in the company. **9,46,950 **is the average per day volume for last 20 days. It will be difficult to sell in off-market even at discount right now. So they are pretty much stuck for now.
Haha! I guess we will see many surprises in the next shareholding pattern.
Not sure how this segued into what caused the fall when I was referring to what, why, and how Adaniās response to Hindenburg needs to be, especially as you consider that as the litmus test of the formerās integrity.
In Dec '22 for Adani Ent, FPIs owned a tad over 15% with DIIs at 5-6% and slightly over 2% with individuals. FPIs sold en masse while DIIs and individuals have largely remained put. DII support (possibly with tacit govt approval) will and has helped stabilise things. Given this, what incentive does Adani have in taking the fight to Hindenburg?
Indeed. If the allegations were false they would have not wasted a single day to take legal action, sue Hindenburg and many others and restore confidence.
This is the tacit support Iām referring to. Not that this govt is a stooge of Adani/Ambani, rather the govt is using them towards it strategic ends. Which is a plausible enough reason for not ascribing entirely altruistic motives to Hindenburgās shorting. Question everyone and everything.