IBM is a dying company.
1 Like
Arenât they saying that they fired lot of HR staff, replaced those with AI bots and recruited almost same number of engineers, sales and marketing staff.
Have a doubt whether these companies are trying to exploit AI bots as a cover-up strategy to deflect something more sinister and serious in the market.
Whereâs this vid from?
1 Like
âMergedâ
In the near future posts like this will be auto deleted 
100% AI-generated video.
1 Like
If they donât fine tune the weights and feedback loop AI itself will create monster out of it just like IRobot movie
[Pausing AI Developments Isnât Enough. We Need to Shut it All Down](â
The Only Way to Deal With the Threat From AI? Shut It Down | TIMEâ
)
This is over two years old. The world hasnât ended yet but there are these -
Itâs turning into an arms race. Where is the guarantee if you shutdown and forego progress that others will follow?
AI company files for bankruptcy after being exposed as 700 Indian engineers
Earlier:
AI Startup Boom Raises Questions of Exaggerated Tech Savvy
SoftBank-backed startup offers âhuman-assistedâ artificial-intelligence; current, former employees say company inflates its tech expertise
https://www.wsj.com/articles/ai-startup-boom-raises-questions-of-exaggerated-tech-savvy-11565775004
1 Like
Making stuff up and doubles down when challenged. Then finally admits stuff was made up and apologises :bored:
Think what the term âAI generated contentâ means
1 Like
What Happens When People Donât Understand How AI Works
**
MSN**
1 Like
Chat GPT, Perplexity are all down.
Is this a hot take or just pure salt from Nadella?
Sure, AI as we all have publicly access to today are all synthesizers, but isnât that a huge step towards AGI?
no, AGI needs a new paradigm, current one will never be AGI, it may come close to it but it will never be AGI
Probably reason:
OpenAI executives weigh antitrust accusation against Microsoft, WSJ reports
2 Likes
at some level definitely, not the entirety of programing ofc.
Calculator example is not valid here as you need a person to run it not a second person to check if what result the calculator had given is write or wrong, when AI achieves this level of accuracy then not even a person is needed to run it it can be automated, like if AI driving achieves 100% accuracy the there no need of driver in that vehicle, same can be said in programming when AI achieves 100% accuracy in writing a program then there is no need for a programmer to examine it thus defeats the purpose of a programmer.
if AI agent does mistake (or turns rogue) then who gets sued?
Can be treated as an industrial error or accident ? The companies involved in creating and configuring AI agent should be on hook ?
1 Like