[
http://www6.tomshardware.com/mobile/20050204/index.html](http://www6.tomshardware.com/mobile/20050204/index.html
)
How about i get that as my “engagement” present..
rool:
[
http://www6.tomshardware.com/mobile/20050204/index.html](http://www6.tomshardware.com/mobile/20050204/index.html
)
How about i get that as my “engagement” present..
rool:
Yo,
dats something nice…
i would sure love ta have one of those:)
pricing..i think is a bit too much though.
lol.. yeah.. but like the conclusion says, if u have it (moolah), get it n flaunt it ![]()
yea…
22k(rs) approx is a lot for 256MB and sunglasses, no matter what:tongue:
Hehe…
Here’s a rational understanding of the price:
9k ----> 256 MB MP3 Player
3k ----> OAKLEY Sunglasses (Note the emphasis on “OAKLEY”)
10k----> The established Brand Name Oakley. (Yes, just for that name Oakley inscribed on da glasses
)
Might say that’s a gr8 price to pay for just gettin’ some text inscribed on ur glasses. ![]()
So u see, contradictory to what a few members have posted, the 256 MB and sunglasses don’t cost much, its the brand name that costs a bomb.![]()
Be it Bose, be it Sony, be it Armani, be it Nike, be it Versace, be it IBM or be it Intel!!! its the same case all the time.. but ppl still prefer these over others.. ![]()
much like the way I always prefer the bata hawai chappals to hit every1 with ![]()
I am brand-consciuos too ![]()
^^ lol.. but when it comes to kicking some ass (mostly b’day bums) its a job for my CAT Steel Toes.. ![]()