Digital Camera

S

sharktale1212

Guide
I am looking for a decent digital camera. The budget isnt high. 15k thereabouts.

After looking at CNET's editor choices zeroed in on :

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290

Is it good or shud I go for something else
 
Yes,Cybershot is great my friend has one of those (same model) it looks and works great.

720p videos of great quality.;)

Smile Detection also works great.

Superb UI.

I simply Loved It.

I say Go for it
 
^^

I'd vote again Panasonic Lumix TZ7, being a fellow owner of the same.

The shots in lowlight are well, simply put, horrible. Even though the other features are excellent, the grainy, under exposes, lowlight shots are a deal killer for me. I bought one a few months ago after EXTENSIVE research for 6months. BUT, I have to say, I haven't yet used a camera that takes as good outdoor shots as this baby. Plus the HD video recording is +1 and more so with the ability to utilize the Optical Zoom feature while shooting a video.

I'd say go for a Canon and give Sony a miss too.
 
One of my major issues with cameras is the output in low light conditions. My previous camera Kodak EasyShare Z915 gave out horrible colors and images looked over processed so decided to move on to a better alternative. I am not a pro while taking pics so need a point and shoot with decent quality.

@Srirama - How are the pictures in low light conditions?

@Sibot - Was it again or against?

Is the battery drain on Canon PowerShot SX120 too much? Video recording is good ?

Also Canon PowerShot S90 anyone?

Edit: Checked some online review for Sx120 - 4 AA batteries? Too many! Video recording is HD 720p.But how much drain is on the battery?
 
sibot said:
^^

I'd vote again Panasonic Lumix TZ7, being a fellow owner of the same.



The shots in lowlight are well, simply put, horrible. Even though the other features are excellent, the grainy, under exposes, lowlight shots are a deal killer for me. I bought one a few months ago after EXTENSIVE research for 6months. BUT, I have to say, I haven't yet used a camera that takes as good outdoor shots as this baby. Plus the HD video recording is +1 and more so with the ability to utilize the Optical Zoom feature while shooting a video.

I'd say go for a Canon and give Sony a miss too.
Click to expand...

Did you even try limiting the ISO? Or use the necessary scene modes ??

Extreme low-light conditions obviously require the use of the flash.

Agreed, it doesn't have the best low light exposures compared to a Fujifilm or Canon but it is definitely acceptable.

I use a TZ4.



@sharktale1212



I'd stay away from the Sony P&Ss if I were you.

Overpriced for the features & IQ they offer, then there's the issue of proprietary accessories.
 
sharktale1212 said:
@Sibot - Was it again or against?
Is the battery drain on Canon PowerShot SX120 too much? Video recording is good ?
Also Canon PowerShot S90 anyone?
Click to expand...
The SX110 IS was a major hit, but the only drawback to the camera was its battery drainage. On a fully charged/new batteries, some would get as low as 50 to 60 shots (with flash) on the best rechargeable batteries. I'm not too sure about the SX120 IS but it would be a good option for you, provided the battery lifetime is good. But I'm against AA batteries being used in digital cameras.
thetoxicmind said:
Did you even try limiting the ISO? Or use the necessary scene modes ??
Extreme low-light conditions obviously require the use of the flash.
Agreed, it doesn't have the best low light exposures compared to a Fujifilm or Canon but it is definitely acceptable.
I use a TZ4.
Click to expand...
Yes, I do limit the ISO. The iA mode is horrible at adjusting ISO, since the intelligent ISO comes into action, most of the shots are taken at 400, which results in uber-grainy pictures. So, I prefer to manually set the ISO levels everytime I have to snap. Outdoors, ISO levels are either 80 or 100, indoors, I use 200 with 1/4 exposure, which again results in blurring. Indeed I would term it as acceptable, but my expectations from this camera were more, going by the expert reviews that term this camera as the best PnS, the indoor/lowlight photography was a rude shock. Flash does compensate, but leaves alot of areas under exposed. If I could do the whole thing again, I would def NOT buy this camera.
Konquerror said:
^^^Ya I second that but i will say image quality is huge factor than batteries for buying a cam...
Click to expand...
Def, but you can't help it if the batteries keep running out after every 50 shots (with flash). I was also considering buying the SX120 IS but IMO Li-ion battery is the way to go.
 
sibot said:
Yes, I do limit the ISO. The iA mode is horrible at adjusting ISO, since the intelligent ISO comes into action, most of the shots are taken at 400, which results in uber-grainy pictures. So, I prefer to manually set the ISO levels everytime I have to snap. Outdoors, ISO levels are either 80 or 100, indoors, I use 200 with 1/4 exposure, which again results in blurring. Indeed I would term it as acceptable, but my expectations from this camera were more, going by the expert reviews that term this camera as the best PnS, the indoor/lowlight photography was a rude shock. Flash does compensate, but leaves alot of areas under exposed. If I could do the whole thing again, I would def NOT buy this camera.
Click to expand...

I usually set it to the manual(never use iA), with the ISO limited to 400.

In general, the above produces decent results but there are times when the output can be grainy, not too bad though imo.

Oh well, most P&Ss have their strengths and weaknesses. :)

Sorry about the OT.
 
AA baqteries can be brought anywhere ...so if u look in this way its a positive factor...few years when the model is disontinued the batery also is not available so AA bateries are better if u look in this angle..
 
sibot said:
The SX110 IS was a major hit, but the only drawback to the camera was its battery drainage. On a fully charged/new batteries, some would get as low as 50 to 60 shots (with flash) on the best rechargeable batteries. I'm not too sure about the SX120 IS but it would be a good option for you, provided the battery lifetime is good. But I'm against AA batteries being used in digital cameras.
Click to expand...

You mean 50-60 shots on 4 AAs ? :huh: That is bad.

It would seem that more money was put on the batteries if I don't go for rechargeable ones.
 
thetoxicmind said:
Did you even try limiting the ISO? Or use the necessary scene modes ??
Extreme low-light conditions obviously require the use of the flash.

Agreed, it doesn't have the best low light exposures compared to a Fujifilm or Canon but it is definitely acceptable.

I use a TZ4.

@sharktale1212

I'd stay away from the Sony P&Ss if I were you.
Overpriced for the features & IQ they offer, then there's the issue of proprietary accessories.
Click to expand...

I have absolutely no Idea why you hate Sony P&Ss, My sony w120 is really good been using it for more than a year now. All the shots were really good.

Extreme low light requirement can be satisfied by three other things other than the use of a flash

1) lens used in the camera (aperture)
2) ISO
3) Shutter speed (Not available in consumer P&Ss)

See this review Budget Camera Group Test (Q4 2008) Review: 15. Conclusions and ratings: Digital Photography Review that rate Sony W120 the best budget camera. Its an old review, clearly shows that Sony P&S isn't bad but actually the best. So when you are saying sony is bad it must be based on the experience of a particular model. Could you tell me which that might be.!?
 
@EnigmatriX & sankhadeep

Nobody hates Sony P&Ss.

Overpriced for the features & IQ they offer, then there's the issue of proprietary accessories.
Click to expand...

^ That's the primary reason why it isn't a popular choice.

I've personally seen the IQ from mid-range P&Ss and they were of average quality comparatively, which clearly doesn't justify the price.
 
Sony Owners - Is it right Sony cams take time in clicking the pic after clicking the button ?

I mean you want to shoot a pic, click the button & it clicks the pic only after lag say 1 second ?
 
Back
Top