India's ruling party ordered online abuse of opponents, claims book

bssunilreddy

Skilled
I started reading and stopped immediately :hilarious::hilarious::hilarious:.

He's either a moron, a troll or some paid BJP shill.
Like I said earlier that I dont reason with fools or idiots.

But you do like those people who say, that they dont like Kongress, BJP or communists. They dont even know what they want.

I am content with the govt in power or should I say more than happy.

I am a bhakt but not a paid one nor I am stupid enough to reason with idiots, I suppose.

Do any of you attended a high court in session or even a fast track courts for traffic offences.

A son of a former CM of AP was wrongly accused of aquiring 1lac crores, taking bribes on behalf of his father.

Did anybody attend such sessions in the District Criminal court where economic offences are investigated by CBI.

Do you know anybody can write to the CJ of the Supreme Court with regard to any redressal of justice which he cannot get in his state or place.

Then I think Mr.J is on par with me. Otherwise please dont waste your or my time Mr.J

If Mr.J needs documentary proof regarding the above matters, then he better start with the book titled Constitution of India then move on to the next set.

If Mr.J is lazy to buy & read them, then he can go to the nearest High Court and ask for access to the digital library regarding all laws and cases.

Then Mr.J shall not be considered a moron, troll or a bhakt.

Then anybody with a sound mind can categorise the types of morons, trolls or bhakts.
 

hotshot05

Skilled
Like I said earlier that I dont reason with fools or idiots.

But you do like those people who say, that they dont like Kongress, BJP or communists. They dont even know what they want.

I am content with the govt in power or should I say more than happy.

I am a bhakt but not a paid one nor I am stupid enough to reason with idiots, I suppose.

Do any of you attended a high court in session or even a fast track courts for traffic offences.

A son of a former CM of AP was wrongly accused of aquiring 1lac crores, taking bribes on behalf of his father.

Did anybody attend such sessions in the District Criminal court where economic offences are investigated by CBI.

Do you know anybody can write to the CJ of the Supreme Court with regard to any redressal of justice which he cannot get in his state or place.

Then I think Mr.J is on par with me. Otherwise please dont waste your or my time Mr.J

If Mr.J needs documentary proof regarding the above matters, then he better start with the book titled Constitution of India then move on to the next set.

If Mr.J is lazy to buy & read them, then he can go to the nearest High Court and ask for access to the digital library regarding all laws and cases.

Then Mr.J shall not be considered a moron, troll or a bhakt.

Then anybody with a sound mind can categorise the types of morons, trolls or bhakts.

You never respond to direct questions with any proof and start on a long speech which does not have any meaning. We are never able to draw any conclusion from your posts.

Son of a former CM of AP was wrongly accused of accruing some amount of money. Why do we need to know this? What conclusion can we draw from this information?
Our line of work does not involve going to courts everyday. Most of us are not lawyers nor journalists and so we don't attend court sessions. So we may get to know of some case only when it is reported in some newspaper.
Also courts work on the Indian Penal Code. Not sure why you referenced the constitution.
High Courts normally upload all of their judgements on their official website. So if Mr. J needs any documentary proof, he can go to the specific website and look at the judgement. Why does he need to read the constitution?

Is there any proof that Satyamev Jayate donated all the money to only Madrasa?
Hearsay is not an accepted form of proof.

When I asked you for this, you went on a long rant regarding some other things but never answered my question.
 

bssunilreddy

Skilled
You never respond to direct questions with any proof and start on a long speech which does not have any meaning. We are never able to draw any conclusion from your posts.

Son of a former CM of AP was wrongly accused of accruing some amount of money. Why do we need to know this? What conclusion can we draw from this information?
Our line of work does not involve going to courts everyday. Most of us are not lawyers nor journalists and so we don't attend court sessions. So we may get to know of some case only when it is reported in some newspaper.
Also courts work on the Indian Penal Code. Not sure why you referenced the constitution.
High Courts normally upload all of their judgements on their official website. So if Mr. J needs any documentary proof, he can go to the specific website and look at the judgement. Why does he need to read the constitution?

Is there any proof that Satyamev Jayate donated all the money to only Madrasa?
Hearsay is not an accepted form of proof.

When I asked you for this, you went on a long rant regarding some other things but never answered my question.
Most of you are not lawyers or journalists yet you can debate or conclude on almost everything right!

Why NDTV was given a ban for few days?

If you need any proof of Satyameva Jayate episode then you can use google. Almost everything can be found.

The 1st and foremost thing we law students study at any law college is the Constitution of India.

If Indian courts only follow IPC but not the constitution like you said. Think twice before you speak.

Regarding the former CMs son accused of accruing money through various dubious deals, I want to convey that Kongress used the CBI to deal with its political rivals.

Had the BJP doing the same now?

Any premier investigative agencies have their own distinct place in the indian legal system. They should not be misutilised for personal political vendetta. Their sanchitity will be lost. The common man might lose his faith on them.

When we think of CBI, we derive that it will not bend its will towards its political masters and will ultimately do justice to us.

This is the conclusion I want you to get buddy.

I will give you a good example between the state & central law enforcement agencies.

When my wife applied for a govt job. She wanted clearance from both state & central agencies. The person on duty from the state came to our house, checked the IDs of her, drank tea and took 1k and left.
The person on duty from the central dept came as usual to our house, checked the IDs of her, refused to drink tea even we offered him and said to my wife that he is content with his salary, refused to take any money. We thought he was waiting a bit longer sitting at our house for as usual money. He left saying best of luck to my wife.

What conclusion can you derive from this buddy??? Tell me!

This is what generally the literate people think of the state & central agencies.

I was very lucky to be brought up by my uncle away from my parents.

He is and was a very wise man. He always thought to bring up his PSU from brankrucy but could not succeed.

Eventually that PSU went brankrupt but he got tired of all clout and left before his retirement.

An honest employee tried everything in his power to do good to the company he worked for.

Brought back huge amounts of dues from overseas contracts but nothing could not save that PSU.

Even many employees like his designation left several years before and joined Private sector.

All he ever wanted was some recognition for what he did.

Never ever did he thought of taking a bribe for what he did or achieved.

Such people will be there in every govt department striving for the organisation they are working for.

Now Mr.Modi is one such person with an attitude.

If the head of an organisation is enthusiastic and workholic, he will eventually lead his pack of employees under in his stride.
 

Mr.J

Skilled
MFW

MeekNervousBurro.gif
 

hotshot05

Skilled
Most of you are not lawyers or journalists yet you can debate or conclude on almost everything right!
Why do you feel that only lawyers and journalists can debate and conclude on matters which affect everyone in the country?
Do they have some special power which makes them eligible to have an opinion?

Whenever we make some statement, we back it up with logic and facts. If you can refute that logic or that fact, the other person's statement becomes null and void. That is how a debate works (in my opinion) and people who read the debate can form their own opinion based on the information provided.

You were saying something about being a lawyer and all. Does the indian justice system work on facts/proof or only on hearsay?
If I accuse someone of murder, will he be given a life sentence only because I said so? Will the court not ask the police to investigate, find proof and file a chargesheet?

Why NDTV was given a ban for few days?
You seem to forget that the ban was never enforced. Since the government decided not to enforce the ban, the Supreme Court decided not to hear the petition challenging the ban. So we do not know if the ban would have had been able to survive judicial scrutiny.
You yourself said that CBI has been used by people in power to target their opponents. Can the NDTV ban order not be an example of such an attack by the party in power on people who decide not to toe their line?

NDTV and other media outlets had published a point by point rebuttal of the reasons given for banning the channel by the regulator.
 
N

NotMyRealName

Them turning Hindustan into Ban-istan is one of the biggest crimes against democracy. I mean who bans media anyway? And a 'lawyer' not grasping that is the biggest joke of em all...
 

Mr.J

Skilled
where does one sign up to get paid to tweet ? dont mind tweeting 30-40 random tweets a day for any party for some side cash
'Random' tweets? Misogynistic, slut-shaming, and bullying tweets full of jingoism and propaganda is not what I'd call random tweets.
 

Aces170

ex-Mod
[troll hat on] I agree, lets get Didi, Mayawatti, SP into power. We will not have any social media trolls, state sponsored newspaper FTW. [troll hat off] Logging here after long, but good to see the anti BJP slandering. What are my alternative political options, come again ;P
 

chiron

Skilled
I've thought a lot about this and what we need is to extirpate the Gandhi dynasty and vote Congress but in such a way that they only have a tiny majority.

https://thewire.in/98900/decentralised-emergency-pyramidal-mafia-state-arun-shourie-modi-sarkar/

We were all working together because we are all so fed up with the inaction in Dr Manmohan Singh’s second term. But that is a great lesson to me. I have been taught a lesson for the second time in my life. Supporting Modi was the second biggest mistake of my life. Of getting so fed up with an existing government that you support anybody.

Couldn't agree more.
 
Last edited:
Top