Like I said earlier that I dont reason with fools or idiots.I started reading and stopped immediately .
He's either a moron, a troll or some paid BJP shill.
Like I said earlier that I dont reason with fools or idiots.
But you do like those people who say, that they dont like Kongress, BJP or communists. They dont even know what they want.
I am content with the govt in power or should I say more than happy.
I am a bhakt but not a paid one nor I am stupid enough to reason with idiots, I suppose.
Do any of you attended a high court in session or even a fast track courts for traffic offences.
A son of a former CM of AP was wrongly accused of aquiring 1lac crores, taking bribes on behalf of his father.
Did anybody attend such sessions in the District Criminal court where economic offences are investigated by CBI.
Do you know anybody can write to the CJ of the Supreme Court with regard to any redressal of justice which he cannot get in his state or place.
Then I think Mr.J is on par with me. Otherwise please dont waste your or my time Mr.J
If Mr.J needs documentary proof regarding the above matters, then he better start with the book titled Constitution of India then move on to the next set.
If Mr.J is lazy to buy & read them, then he can go to the nearest High Court and ask for access to the digital library regarding all laws and cases.
Then Mr.J shall not be considered a moron, troll or a bhakt.
Then anybody with a sound mind can categorise the types of morons, trolls or bhakts.
Most of you are not lawyers or journalists yet you can debate or conclude on almost everything right!You never respond to direct questions with any proof and start on a long speech which does not have any meaning. We are never able to draw any conclusion from your posts.
Son of a former CM of AP was wrongly accused of accruing some amount of money. Why do we need to know this? What conclusion can we draw from this information?
Our line of work does not involve going to courts everyday. Most of us are not lawyers nor journalists and so we don't attend court sessions. So we may get to know of some case only when it is reported in some newspaper.
Also courts work on the Indian Penal Code. Not sure why you referenced the constitution.
High Courts normally upload all of their judgements on their official website. So if Mr. J needs any documentary proof, he can go to the specific website and look at the judgement. Why does he need to read the constitution?
Is there any proof that Satyamev Jayate donated all the money to only Madrasa?
Hearsay is not an accepted form of proof.
When I asked you for this, you went on a long rant regarding some other things but never answered my question.
Why do you feel that only lawyers and journalists can debate and conclude on matters which affect everyone in the country?Most of you are not lawyers or journalists yet you can debate or conclude on almost everything right!
You seem to forget that the ban was never enforced. Since the government decided not to enforce the ban, the Supreme Court decided not to hear the petition challenging the ban. So we do not know if the ban would have had been able to survive judicial scrutiny.Why NDTV was given a ban for few days?
We were all working together because we are all so fed up with the inaction in Dr Manmohan Singh’s second term. But that is a great lesson to me. I have been taught a lesson for the second time in my life. Supporting Modi was the second biggest mistake of my life. Of getting so fed up with an existing government that you support anybody.