CPU/Mobo Intel Prepares Overclocking Friendly Core i3-2120K CPU

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hades.

Inactive
Galvanizer
Source: Intel Prepares Overclocking Friendly Core i3-2120K CPU - Softpedia

In the coming months, Intel will expand its Sandy Bridge processor lineup with a new K-series Core i3 CPU that targets enthusiast users and features dual processing cores, a 3.3GHz base frequency, and an unlocked multiplier.

The chip is known as the Core i3-2120K and, once launched, it will become Intel's fastest Sandy Bridge CPU with two processing cores.

But its most important feature is the unlocked multiplier design, as this means that overclockers will be able to push the operating frequencies of the processor further than Intel's specifications.

Outside of these modifications, the 2120K shares most of its features with the rest of Intel's Core i3 CPU models and features 3MB of Level 3 cache, Intel HD 2000 integrated graphics, an integrated memory controller, and Hyper-Threading support.

The chip's TDP has also remained unchanged from the rest of the Core i3 desktop lineup and is set at 65W.

Sadly, we don't know when the Core i3-2120K is scheduled to make its appearance, but according to the Xfastest publication, this will be priced at $150 USD.

When it designed the Sandy Bridge architecture, Intel decided to take a different route as far as overclocking is concerned and it locked the BCLK of the CPUs.

This means that overclocking is no longer possible if the processor doesn't come with an unlocked multiplier.

Right now, only two of Intel's CPUs have such a multiplier, the Core i7-2600K and the Core i5-2500K, but both of these feature four processing cores, so the Core i3-2120K will be the only Sandy Bridge chip to come with an unlocked multi.

In the forth quarter of this year, Intel will release new processor models based on the Sandy Bridge-E architecture that will feature even greater overclocking potential as both their BCLK and multiplier will be unlocked.

Intel took a step in the right direction now... i3 2120K + Budget P67 Board would be a great VFM combo but the sad part is that 5-6K P67 boards are currently not available in India... the cheapest P67 board in India is selling for 7.9k :(
 
I will be waiting for this. :D

However, I feel the pricing is a bit too high if its true. :( Most people would consider getting a cheap i5 even though it would have a locked multiplier. Since P67 won't be needed for locked cores, the price difference between the 2 combos would be pretty close.
 
haha 150$ for overclocking a dual-core? Man Intel have beaten themselves to a new low. Next.

50$ upgrade bios for adding Ivy Bridge support to your existing 1155 motherboard.
 
^^150$ is really not a bad price as i3 2100 clocked (&locked) at 3.1GHz is selling for 125 dollars... And man this thing would just fly @ 5GHz... And have you really forgotten that Intel was selling a dual core unlocked processor (655k) for 200 and above dollars last year... :P They are just charging 20$ for unlocked multi... This time Intel has really priced their processors very aggressively... And its really undeniable... :)
 
^^150$ is really not a bad price as i3 2100 clocked (&locked) at 3.1GHz is selling for 125 dollars... And man this thing would just fly @ 5GHz..

have to keep in mind, 50$ more can get you double the performance with i5 2500k

really, intel's greatest loss is their processors are too good at high end, and the low end is priced too high.
 
have to keep in mind, 50$ more can get you double the performance with i5 2500k

Correction: 75$ as i5 2500K is currently selling for 225$ :P... See 75$ premium would be way too high for some people... So for them i3 2100K would be an ideal choice... Though i do think too that they could have priced this proccy much aggressively... 130$ would have been a great price... :)
 
Although SB 2100 is a dual core, it competes with AMD's top notch quad cores and basic/mid hexa cores, at least for gaming.
 
Check crysis 2 benchmarks(CPU), even the athlon II X4's annihilate Intel's duals. Seems real cores give real performance,
 
Core i3 2100 58 FPS

X4 945 61 FPS

more or less the same, even Core i5 is just 3-4 FPS faster than Core i3.

But at hardcore settings

Core i3 48 FPS

Core i5 48 FPS

X6 1075 48 FPS

X4 48 FPS

So Core i3 2100 is more or less equal to X4 925/945. I rest my case :P
 
Yeah, pretty much the same. Thankfully, crysis 2 uses more than 2 cores, otherwise another reason to say , MAXIMUM PHAIL LOl.
 
comp@ddict said:
Damn. All that benchmarks told me was that I need to upgrade my E2180 to play Crysis 2. :ashamed: :lol:

To be fair, the pricing isn't that bad. You would say that you can get a 2500k for just another $75. But you also need to consider that the i3 2100 selling at $125 already packs a lot of muscle for its price. Just because it's i3 doesn't mean that it's a slouch compared to the i5. Seriously, the i3 proccys need more love. :P

Anyways, one thing for sure. The 2120K will be sure to break a few records. :P A dual core unlocked Sandy Bridge would be an OC'ing monster.
 
But you also need to consider that the i3 2100 selling at $125 already packs a lot of muscle for its price. Just because it's i3 doesn't mean that it's a slouch compared to the i5. Seriously, the i3 proccys need more love.

as a bonus you get a processor which wont overclock more than 100Mhz. Now thats a HUGE DAMPER. COnsidering at the same price a Phenom II X4 955 can be had, and 4GHz is on your plate(and it definitely outperforms i3 series)
 
Yup true, but considering both at stock, the i3 2100 does have it's advantages. Even with a 955 overclocked, it just manages to beat the i3 in gaming.

Power consumption of Sandy Bridge is much less than the Phenom.

Another factor to be considered is the 955 comes with a lame stock cooler. For overclocking you will need to spend on a decent cooler as well.
 
Even with a 955 overclocked, it just manages to beat the i3 in gaming.

not everybody buys a processor only for gaming dude.. everywhere else the extra cores come in handy(photoshop, vid encoding etc etc)
 
That's what I keep wondering. Everyone keeps talking about multi threaded apps and stuff. How many actually do use it?

I'm sure there would be more number of people who would just game/watch movies/browse etc than who actually use photoshop/video editing/encoding etc extensively.

IMO most people would be happy with either processor. But ofcourse those who need more cores, a true quadcore will be required.
 
I'm sure there would be more number of people who would just game/watch movies/browse etc than who actually use photoshop/video editing/encoding etc extensively.

actually there are many many people, as more and more buy smartphones and need to encode their movies into their phones and all

That's what I keep wondering. Everyone keeps talking about multi threaded apps and stuff. How many actually do use it?

it's happening, and casual buyers buy once a few years. SO would you want them to buy hardware that can come in handy 2 years down the line or get outdated instead?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.