Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Feedback
View Statistics
Members
Current visitors
Buy Sell Trade
WTB
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Forums
Technology
Computer Hardware
shocker for intel !!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Vandal" data-source="post: 75649" data-attributes="member: 1570"><p>Yes true....not only shared cache but also the fact that this is better for streamed instructions only where there is a data flow but the source remains the same and the instructions alike, like say vid encoding...</p><p></p><p>For data where the instruction type differs and maybe 2 or more instructions attack the same HT thread (where the HT unit cannot discern between discrete threads)....will cause 1 of the logical CPU's to slow down, therefore slowing down both (cause physically there'll be only 1 CPU....</p><p>Intel admitted to this part as a flaw in the concept and ultimately in the design, but for vid editing and aud editing and even gaming it worked fine for awhile....... until AMD64's came out the 3.2 and 3.4 gig intel CPU's were virtually running the show.....when compared to the bartons of that time.......</p><p></p><p>The dual and later on possibly quad core concept was the only way to go, and as die sizes shrink further, refinement inproves...etc we may see 2 CPU's quad cored on a desktop board.......</p><p>The only way to improve current days performance is going multi core so HT was a good starter for this concept.....albiet not a hugely successful one.....</p><p></p><p>Nice post...pal:hap2:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Vandal, post: 75649, member: 1570"] Yes true....not only shared cache but also the fact that this is better for streamed instructions only where there is a data flow but the source remains the same and the instructions alike, like say vid encoding... For data where the instruction type differs and maybe 2 or more instructions attack the same HT thread (where the HT unit cannot discern between discrete threads)....will cause 1 of the logical CPU's to slow down, therefore slowing down both (cause physically there'll be only 1 CPU.... Intel admitted to this part as a flaw in the concept and ultimately in the design, but for vid editing and aud editing and even gaming it worked fine for awhile....... until AMD64's came out the 3.2 and 3.4 gig intel CPU's were virtually running the show.....when compared to the bartons of that time....... The dual and later on possibly quad core concept was the only way to go, and as die sizes shrink further, refinement inproves...etc we may see 2 CPU's quad cored on a desktop board....... The only way to improve current days performance is going multi core so HT was a good starter for this concept.....albiet not a hugely successful one..... Nice post...pal:hap2: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Technology
Computer Hardware
shocker for intel !!!
Top
Bottom