Weren't all dinosaurs reptiles?

KingKrool

Skilled
Look at this article:

http://in.rediff.com/news/2005/aug/16dino.htm

The amount has been sanctioned recently to develop this area in a big way which has very unique characteristic because most of the dinosaurs that roamed this areas were reptiles

Wow! Most were reptiles but not all of them were!!! Some were fish, some were mammals, some were birds and some were ameoba!!!:rofl::rofl::eek:hyeah:

Look, I know that some paleontologists are not comfortable classifying dinosaurs as reptiles, but I have never heard of any claiming that they were split into groups with some being reptiles!!!:S
 
AWESOME!!! :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Bloody hell...... Then I guess most of the humans are mammals. Some maybe reptiles too.....
 
Rediff is to the net what TOI is to the print world.....
Whenever I need a hearty laugh, i head to rediff.....
Check out some of their technology guides which they publish once in a while
 
Well if you look, the article is from PTI (Press Trust of India).
Such articles are not edited or typed in manually, they are entered in directly after applying whatever templates.... so I guess either PTI got it wrong, or that guy from the geological survey screwed up!!!!
 
the guy from the geological survery screwed it up. He was quoted in that article. And they alwats print EXACTLY what he quotes.
 
Back
Top