Search results

I recently made a thread on which phone to buy - https://techenclave.com/threads/suggestions-for-a-mobile.220181/ I bought the S23. I'll note I had specific requirements, mostly related to the physical size and layout of the phone. You should consider your use case and what you need and make a...

Monitors and other professional speakers are often sold as singles, as opposed to typical home audio/hi-fi speakers. When buying a monitor I would suggest that unless explicitly stated as pair you should assume it is a single.

Doctrines are a guide. There is no hard limit in my understanding. Obviously no politician/general will tell you otherwise. Whether a country can be destroyed or not depends on the number of nuclear weapons,their yield and the size of the country. I do not believe nukes are simply to protect...

Separate from what you said, Ukraine is loosing because it is half spent. Another 2 years (give or take) and it will collapse.

Ability is what you can and can't do. Doctrine is just laying down a plan in case something happens. It isn't absolute. Deterrence is simple, it is what it says, to give the enemy a reason not to use nukes. You can make threats for conventional attacks with fewer nukes as well, as long as you...

When talking of nukes it is best not to get bogged down in doctrine, countries use it as they please. Doctrine is just a message. I did mention previously about quickly and effectively hitting a target, the US and Russia can do this, most of the other's have limitations with delivery technology...

Nukes serve a different purpose, it has little to do with conventional capability. It's a safety card, and in the modern world something to try and press an opponent without force. In the cold war of course it was just a safety card, MAD. It's a little strange that it's initial use was to end a...

There's a big difference between a nuclear weapon and the ability to quickly and effectively hit a target anywhere in the world. Also needless to say mass means everything, especially when you want to cover a large land area. If you don't know this then as best as I could gather (going by...

I didn't bother reading all of this but you need professional displays for this and dedicated hardware/software. Unless size is of utmost importance beyond a 85-98" TV I would suggest using that.

It isn't the money or an agreement. It is the sheer intent to cause harm, if for their benefit rather than your loss. What you feel might be rage. Or worse, hate. As an aside, things like this will develop and at some point is why the human race should, and will, eventually go extinct.

This might suggest it is basically about availability,variety and price rather than specific components not available elsewhere.

What is available in China that people want to buy from there? Is there some specific item that is not available elsewhere? Or is it simply cheap goods?

This sounds like a way to simply shift culpability to the buyer and also increase sales from a lack of trust from the buyer. Thank you for the answer.

I see. I suppose there are reasons, I don't really see online shopping as useful in general. The main exception (for me) are products not available locally.

I'm curious why people buy open box from Flipkart after all the times people note issues with it. You'd think it would be easier to buy from local stores, are the discounts offered sufficient to risk it? Personally I tend to buy most things from offline stores, often places where I know the...

No. I don't believe both sides are "legit". I don't visit reddit and I don't discuss politics much. Personally I don't see the point of debate, you can not convince a fanatic. If you could the amount of time and effort required would be large and for what? Your opinion is shared by one who...

My post wasn't directed at you. It was a general post that applies to people who are into politics.

All that matters to people these days in political debates (online and offline) is supporting their faction (whichever it is) and burning the opposition. Everything else is irrelevant. Those who follow this are fanatical. Pick a side, pick a gun and fight.

In my house and most of the people I know (last I checked) still get multiple newspapers everyday and they read it in the morning. That said I understand what you are trying to say. Just because a human might write it doesn't mean it's not bullshit. But yes, I see what you mean.

When the article mentions written journalism do they mean that now people prefer youtube/video reviews?