10,000 3Dmarks05 breached with a single x1800xt

Status
Not open for further replies.
Blade_Runner

Blade_Runner

Forerunner
X1800XT Spec:
Core Code: R520 (TSMC 90nm with Low-k)
Pixel Shader: 16 pipelines
Support hi-quality AVIVO
Support Shader Model 3.0, DirectX 9.0c, etc.
Support H.264 hardware acceleration
GPU Core speed: 625Mhz
Video RAM: GDDR3 512MB
Video RAM speed: 1.5Ghz
RRP: US$ 499 (256MB), US$549 (512MB)
ETA: 08/11/2005

Digital-Info received R520XT, the high-end version of X1800 family from ATI Taiwan today.



56k' warning for the extreme systems link posted below.

Source

From Bjorn3d

3DMark05 score = 12164
Driver settings = performance mode in CCC
CPU speed = 3.59GHz (1.74V)
System Memory = 239 MHz 2-2-2-5 (3.42VMushkin Redline)
Hyperstransport Speed = 239 x 5 -> 1.2GHz
Engine clock = 864 MHz (programmed the core voltage regulator with a value of "a". I tried increasing the voltage more by going to "9" and the board immediately dies…is it supposed to do that????)
Memory clock = 990 MHz (programmed regulator for MVDDC and MVDDQ to "bf")
Click to expand...

Source
 
rahul said:
it was done way before with a 7800GTX .... this is not the highest there are more but i am lazy yo find the links ....
Click to expand...

yup but with ln2. this on air :ohyeah: and with a 3700+ @ 2790Mhz. I would love to see the oc'ing results with a oc'ed fx-57 and ln2.

 
For me performance in games is more important.

ATi just stays along with the 7800 GTX though its 2500 3D Marks difference.
 
x1800xt 512mb is much faster than the 7800gtx 256mb in 3dmark & most of the games. although i dont know how both the 256mb cards will compare.

check the benchmarks atleast before u post goldenfrag
 
What i mean to say is that the Performance is tight. Plus we really have to wait for the 7800 GTX 512mb to compare it to the XT 512.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom