That is what i have been telling . It points to a sabotage than anything else. On a modern plane there is no way the plane can get paralysed . I am sure if the engine failed the pilots would have attempted restarting the engines and that would be recorded in the black box .Okay, so this is what I read.
On the Boeing 787, there is no manual way to deploy the RAT. It is deployed automatically, designed this way to reduce the pilot’s workload so they can focus on other critical tasks in the event of a failure.
So does this mean pilot error is out of the question? What could a pilot do in the cockpit that would trigger the RAT? Before takeoff, all systems must show a green light. If there were any warnings, the pilot wouldn’t proceed.
Each one will want to protect their interest . So the black box data will be interpreted in a few different ways . Ultimately the truth will never come out if it was not meant to be .people who have come to investigate are from uk ,boeing and NTSB US . And blackbox data too will not be investigated in india .You know where i am going with this..
It is impossible to relight the engine within 30 seconds. NTSB has the best track record of anyone in publishing findings and recommendations, which has made the industry safer as a whole, so it is disingenuous to suggest that they would be burying the truth. Also recorders are always sent to the manufacturers as they have other forensic tools to extract data in case of damage.That is what i have been telling . It points to a sabotage than anything else. On a modern plane there is no way the plane can get paralysed . I am sure if the engine failed the pilots would have attempted restarting the engines and that would be recorded in the black box .
Each one will want to protect their interest . So the black box data will be interpreted in a few different ways . Ultimately the truth will never come out if it was not meant to be .
Pilots maintain a stopwatch against the ground speed, so normally if they are not close to V1 within that time, they would usually abort. It is the decision speed. If they cross that, then they have to rotate at Vr and maintain V2 even if they have lost an engine. It is quite possible that in this case, the decision was not made until V1 and the pilots were under the impression that they could maintain V2 which can easily be attained with even one functional engine.what i am trying to say is this . if he would have aborted than was there enough space to be safe. Please note this is a different scenarion where the plane skid , landing gear was broken and it smashed into boundary wall wherein i guess there were two survivors
Can you please share the source, Because Everywhere its being Mentioned as it was last done in 2023 and next one was due in Dec 2025
Nice to watch but these are just theatrics for the public. There is no legal consequences for the CEO.... He would be pampered with plush exit package to not open the mouth.Old video, but man, the CEO was ripped a new one.