CPU/Mobo AMD’s next-generation Star supports DDR2-1066 & SSE4A

Status
Not open for further replies.
AMD’s next-generation Star supports DDR2-1066 & SSE4A

amdce2007h2kt6.jpg

In the 4-year life time, AMD’s K8 processors have put AMD to its high. Not until the launch of Intel Core processors, these K8 processors were said to be the leader of performance. Of course, AMD is unwilling to pass the leading position to Intel. In the fore coming Q3 2007, AMD’s next-generation Star processors will be put into the market and fight with Intel’s Core. To prepare this war, besides the improvement of its microarchitecture, AMD is persuading JEDEC (Joint Electron Device Engineering Council) to put DDR2-1066 as the standard, letting the faster memory be officially supported in Star.

The new Star family includes quad-core Agena, mainstream dual-core Kuma, entry dual core Rana, and single-core Spica. In addition, the old K8 architecture has been renamed to Cities. The new Star microarchitecture has lots of improvements includes : Hyper-Transport 3.0 (from 2GT/s to 5.2GT/s), 32B Instruction Fetch, more precise Branch Prediction and Out-of-Order Load Execution, 4 Double Precision FLOPS/Cycle, Dual 128Bit SSE calculation, and Load per Cycle. At the same clock speed, the new microarchitecture would further push the performance to another high. It should be noted that AM2+ and AM2 is compatible to each other. For example, Altair can work in the existing Socket AM2 main board, the only need is BIOS upgrade. Yet Hyper-Transport will get only 2GHz in Socket AM2 main board as ver. 2.0. Furthermore, AM2+ main board is also designed to support AM3, according to AMD’s AM2r2 specification.

In the previous plan, AM3 processors with build-in DDR2/3 memory controller are the direct successor of the existing AM2 processors. Yet AMD has decided to postpone AM3 as they reviewed the market trend of DDR3 memory, estimated that DDR3 will only be put into common until 2009. The decision is good to both consumers and AMD, such that AMD can simplify its design to lower the cost as well as making more time to AMD to prepare the upcoming DDR3 era.

So far, JEDEC has only recognized DDR2-800 as the highest standard of DDR2, DDR3 would be the next-generation high-speed memory. Regarding with the memory performance, DDR2-800 seems too weak to compete with DDR3-1066 which supported by the upcoming Intel’s Beaelake platform. For this reason, AMD is persuading JEDEC to also put DDR2-1066 as the standard, letting the faster memory can be officially and natively supported in Star.

Regarding with the 48 SSE4 to be added into Intel’s next-generation 45nm products, AMD has announced last week that Star will have SSE4A, a derivative edition of SSE4 in which those Intel 64 instructions are not available. Instructions include graphic, video encoding, 3D calculation, multimedia related are all compatible in Star.

In the first quarter of its launch, AMD estimated that Star would share 10% of the total shipment for entry and above market. When single-core Rana is released in Q4 2007, this figure rise to a double of 20%; while in Q1 2008, Star would increase to 60%, crossing over with the old models.

Source:- ¹q¸£»â°ì HKEPC Hardware - ¥þ´ä No.1 PC°Q½×°à - IT News - AMD¡¦s next-generation Star supports DDR2-1066 & SSE4A
 
The future looks bright, the future is AMD.... :bleh: :bleh:

Overvolt Me,Overclock Me,AMD Me !!!! :ohyeah:
WHeeeeee !!!!! :clap: :clap: :clap:
 
Intel aint sitting with Kentsfield as well... I think AMD really lost it by killing K10... Hoping Stars (K8L) atleast give a fight to Intel's real quad-cores!!
 
I think so.

It should be noted that AM2+ and AM2 is compatible to each other. For example, Altair can work in the existing Socket AM2 main board, the only need is BIOS upgrade. Yet Hyper-Transport will get only 2GHz in Socket AM2 main board as ver. 2.0.
 
apollyon said:
noob question - will the star cores work on current am2 mobos?
say the m2n32sli dlx?

I feel that Star Cores are bacward compatible.

They have mentioned that with a BIOS upgrade AM2+ will work on AM2 Boards.
 
wht 128bit processer support......earlier everyone wer runing for 64bit processer...but still not much application out forit...and now amd goin for 128bit one......

whts the progress of intel in that dept????
 
Originally Posted by sunbiz_3000
Intel aint sitting with Kentsfield as well... I think AMD really lost it by killing K10... Hoping Stars (K8L) atleast give a fight to Intel's real quad-cores!!

HHhh.. whatever Intel do it cannot match AMD and plz correct urself as Kentsfield is not a Real Quad core. As a real Quad core will sports a 4x4 roadmap as 4 cores on the same DIE. while Intel QXE6700 is a combination of double core i.e 2 E6700 slapped on same die just like PD. So the performance of the Amd's Quaddy will be a top notch when compared to QX....
And u are hoping that K8L will give a fight to Intel Duh.. it will tear apart the core series as AMD always sports true core processors.. :ohyeah:
Originally Posted by apollyon
noob question - will the star cores work on current am2 mobos?
say the m2n32sli dlx?

Yes of course the image posted clarifies that ...
 
HHhh.. whatever Intel do it cannot match AMD and plz correct urself as Kentsfield is not a Real Quad core. As a real Quad core will sports a 4x4 roadmap as 4 cores on the same DIE.

I meant the same thing. :P When AMD come out with K8L, intel is also gonna have real quad-cores, not something fake like Kentsfield that they currently have!!

Also, please correct yourself when u say "real" quad-core and 4x4 roadmap. 4x4's currently are not real quad-cores. They are just 2 dual-cores on one motherboard on 2 different sockets!!

And u are hoping that K8L will give a fight to Intel Duh.. it will tear apart the core series as AMD always sports true core processors..

Only time will tell how my tearing will b done by whom?? But then as much info they have released currently about Stars... it still doesn't seem enuf to tear apart Intel :P mayb just overtake Intel by an inch.
 
Does anyone remember when Intel had pentium 2 and AMD had K6, where Pentium 2 still used to give higher performance. Then came Pentium 3, where the lead got extended even more. No one thought that AMD will abe to match it, since they have double thier lead. Out of no-where AMD released K7 aka Athlons. Same case was with Hammers getting released for pentium 4. History repeats itself.
 
evilution said:
Does anyone remember when Intel had pentium 2 and AMD had K6, where Pentium 2 still used to give higher performance. Then came Pentium 3, where the lead got extended even more. No one thought that AMD will abe to match it, since they have double thier lead. Out of no-where AMD released K7 aka Athlons. Same case was with Hammers getting released for pentium 4. History repeats itself.

Ok now that post of yours just won yourself a free drink from me :P

* truly hopes what Evi said really happens *

Nothing can be pleasin enough to see AMD take Intel's ------------ left n right....lol :bleh:
 
According to what evi said,

Intel will go ever further ahead with Yorkfield, and only after that will amd come back :P.

I sure do hope that happens :ohyeah:...

Edit : I know being a Intel fanboy is murder @ TE. But, :bleh:...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.