ATi's Overclocking Policy

Status
Not open for further replies.

dipdude

Forerunner
atioc3kc.jpg


Source : HKPEC
 
I dont think it was needed.... I mean peepz were doing it anyways. This will mean more to partners as they can price the cards according to their specs [Read: More Expensive].
 
Harshal said:
I dont think it was needed.... I mean peepz were doing it anyways. This will mean more to partners as they can price the cards according to their specs [Read: More Expensive].

haha yeah we can see pre overclocked cards from the partners :P this might be a good thing :P we might see cards with better memory chips and better heatsinks
 
ATI had to do it. WHat was hurting ATI sales is NV partners bumping the speeds on their cards making cards more competitive than it supposed to be at stock speeds. And i am sure ATI partners were not happy with that.

This is only good. I dont think anyone is planning to charge ultra premium these days, specially on ATI cards which do not usually speed bin cores, atleast at high end.
 
ATI wants you to overclock. Really, it's OK

Several weeks ago, ATI sent out a few product advisories claiming that AIB partners were free to overclock any GPU in the the ATI X1000 series. Last year, ATI made a similar statement about the X1800 cards, but this is officially the first time ATI has openly sanctioned overclocking any current generation board.

ATI's memo claims manufacturers who "creatively brand" hardware to reflect overclocked values may risk getting cut off from ASIC allocation -- so we shouldn't have to worry about X1650XT Super-Extreme-Edition cards flooding the market anytime soon. However, like with NVIDIA cards, we may see more batch-by-batch overclocks on specific cards. NVIDIA has an open policy on manufacturer overclocks, claiming that the manufacturers are responsible for RMAs. On the other hand, they are also are allowed to push clocks as far as they want.

ATI will still impose partner specific "Shipping Clocks" on all of its cards. For example, your PowerColor card may have a higher Shipping Clock than a GeCube card from the same ASIC. The end user may still use tools like Catalyst Control Center to overclock to a maximum clock specified by ATI. Of course, using a third party tool like ATITool is not sanctioned by the company yet, but there is nothing that would prevent you (the end user) from using that either -- yet.

Interestingly enough, the documentation claims that ATI partners are not allowed to underclock ASICs -- those attempting to get creative with passive cooling will still have to underclock on their own.

ATI claims thermal damage is strictly not covered by RMA and that blown internal fuses in the GPU will notify RMA teams if the GPU has been stressed too hard.
 
Well it just limits your own overclocking abilities. Cause these Pre-OC'ed cards will come with coolers enough for their speeds, you'll have to spend more on an aftermarket cooler and then see what the card can do.

Basically making it easier for noobs to get higher 3DMark scores without doing anything.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.