Hi,
Budget: 5-10k
Usage : Home & Indoors Only
I need a vacuum cleaner. I have zeroed down to these two (also open for any other brands).
[Bagged] Karcher wd 3.200 or wd 4.200
[Bagless ] LG - VC3116NNTM
I have gone through earlier threads and noted the suggestions that were made - Panasonic did come up. I had earlier used a Eureka Forbes for more than 12 years (stopped working long back) & not interested in it anymore - the brand.
I have also noted that both the above brands come with limited accessories. Karcher comes with just 1 paper bag. So I was thinking why not go for a paperless vac like the LG & be permanently free from this nuisance.
However, after some random searching on the net - the general view is that "bagless" IS NOT THE BEST option.
BAGLESS - Main advantage is it is easy to retrieve any object that gets accidently sucked. Biggest disadvantage is periodic cleaning of the "filter" + annual replacement. How much do these filters cost ? Salesmen do not point out so many things.
A very exhaustive thread with feedback - http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1735735
Marketing gimmicks and what they never tell you - http://www.mikesvacuum.net/2012/04/30/which-is-better-bagged-or-bagless/
http://housekeeping.about.com/od/vacuumcleaners/f/vac_bagorless.htm
http://www.home-ec101.com/bagless-vacuums-the-dirty-secret/
Top 5 Reasons To AVOID Bagless Vacuum Cleaners
Your opinions and feedback will be most appreciated.
Terry
Budget: 5-10k
Usage : Home & Indoors Only
I need a vacuum cleaner. I have zeroed down to these two (also open for any other brands).
[Bagged] Karcher wd 3.200 or wd 4.200
[Bagless ] LG - VC3116NNTM
I have gone through earlier threads and noted the suggestions that were made - Panasonic did come up. I had earlier used a Eureka Forbes for more than 12 years (stopped working long back) & not interested in it anymore - the brand.
I have also noted that both the above brands come with limited accessories. Karcher comes with just 1 paper bag. So I was thinking why not go for a paperless vac like the LG & be permanently free from this nuisance.
However, after some random searching on the net - the general view is that "bagless" IS NOT THE BEST option.
BAGLESS - Main advantage is it is easy to retrieve any object that gets accidently sucked. Biggest disadvantage is periodic cleaning of the "filter" + annual replacement. How much do these filters cost ? Salesmen do not point out so many things.
http://www.simplicityvac.com/choosing-a-vacuum/?id=18Bagless vacuum systems use a "cyclonic" technology that separates larger dirt and debris from the main air stream and drops these particles into a cup. This cup can then be removed and the dirt dumped into a waste can. The problem with "cyclonic" technology is that only the larger particles of dirt and debris are removed, and the fine dirt exhausts out of the vacuum -- back into the room.
To overcome this problem, all bagless machines require filters to capture smaller particles. While it's true you'll save money not purchasing bags, you will have to pay yearly for replacement filters. Bagless vacuum manufacturers recommend changing filters 1-2 times per year.
A very exhaustive thread with feedback - http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1735735
Marketing gimmicks and what they never tell you - http://www.mikesvacuum.net/2012/04/30/which-is-better-bagged-or-bagless/
http://housekeeping.about.com/od/vacuumcleaners/f/vac_bagorless.htm
http://www.home-ec101.com/bagless-vacuums-the-dirty-secret/
Top 5 Reasons To AVOID Bagless Vacuum Cleaners
Your opinions and feedback will be most appreciated.
Terry