All that they did against the aussies was nothin but another flash in the bengali pan...
england of all teams, racked up 391 against them...
i wonder how much the 'tigers' are gonna reply with...
do these guys even deserve a place in international cricket? after their win over the aussies, i read an article on cricinfo.com, where someone was talkin abt the bangaldeshi's being better than zimbabwe and kenya!! what in hell is the ICC achieving by having such mediocre teams competing on an international stage along with teams like the aussies(despite thier recent poor form), SA, ind etc?? imo international cricket should be divided into two... nd bag, zim, ken nd a coupla assosciate nations should be dumped into the lower league... let them have a promotion relegation system wherein, every 3/4 yrs one team gets promoted nd one demoted...
whatsay guys??
p.s: i shudder to think of what would have happened if kevin pietersen had come out to bat....
england of all teams, racked up 391 against them...
i wonder how much the 'tigers' are gonna reply with...
do these guys even deserve a place in international cricket? after their win over the aussies, i read an article on cricinfo.com, where someone was talkin abt the bangaldeshi's being better than zimbabwe and kenya!! what in hell is the ICC achieving by having such mediocre teams competing on an international stage along with teams like the aussies(despite thier recent poor form), SA, ind etc?? imo international cricket should be divided into two... nd bag, zim, ken nd a coupla assosciate nations should be dumped into the lower league... let them have a promotion relegation system wherein, every 3/4 yrs one team gets promoted nd one demoted...
whatsay guys??
p.s: i shudder to think of what would have happened if kevin pietersen had come out to bat....