January 23, 2007
AMD's Road Leads To Barcelona
By Andy Patrizio
AMD (Quote) is itching for a fight with Intel, preparing for the next round of the server rumble with the upcoming Barcelona chip.
The No. 2 chipmaker is starting to release details about its next-generation server processor, the follow-up to its highly-successful Opteron chip.
Code-named Barcelona, the new chip is a quad-core design that tweaks the existing x86-64 processor architecture.
AMD expects to ship Barcelona chips by the middle of this year. In a meeting with internetnews.com this week, AMD officials emphasized several key differentiators over the Intel (Quote) quad-core server chip, the Xeon 5300, or Clovertown.
First, the Barcelona chip is a native quad-core design, not two dual cores glued together like the Xeon 5300, AMD officials claim.
The memory controller for Barcelona is built into the chip and not external, like the front-side bus design Intel uses, leading AMD to claim greater performance because the chip's four cores are not getting bottlenecked going through one gateway.
Despite the big gain in performance over the previous generation, Barcelona will have the same power consumption levels, with 95- and 68-watt designs.
So even though the wattage hasn't gone down, the increase in processing power turns into a 60 percent-per-watt performance gain, according to Randy Allen, vice president of the server and workstation division at AMD.
Allen said there's an 80 percent scale over dual core processors; AMD's own benchmarks put it well ahead of the Xeon 5300 in terms of performance.
"We took their best punch with Clovertown and this is our response," he said.
Second, AMD designed the hardware to be easily upgraded. An existing Opteron server can be upgraded by removing the old processors, placing the new Barcelona chip in the socket, and performing a BIOS (define) upgrade.
AMD also took pains to support virtualization by working with VMWare, Xen and Microsoft to create AMD-V the company's hardware-assisted virtualization technology.
Barcelona also tweaks the existing design of the x86-64 processor, but those tweaks are significant.
Streaming SIMD Extensions (SSE) have been expanded from 64-bits to 128-bits; the data cache bandwidth has been doubled to 2x 128 bit loads per cycle; and the L2 cache bandwidth has also doubled, to 128 bits per cycle.
Also, the memory controllers now support full 48-bit addressing, which could allow for up to 256 terabytes (define) of physical memory. Yes, 256TB of memory.
The AMD architecture has also been designed from to operate in a multi-processor, multi-core environment, so its scalability is not the issue facing the company, said Dean McCarron, president of Mercury Research.
AMD's problem is building it. Intel has a distinct advantage in manufacturing. It can make more chips, make them faster and make them smaller. AMD won't be using a 45-nanometer die size until the end of the year, while Intel is already on 45nm.
So it becomes a competition of trade-offs.
"AMD will have the architecture that tips the balance of scalability in their favor, but Intel has the manufacturing and pricing advantage," McCarron said.
But he added, AMD is in a significantly better position now than it was in 2003, when Opteron was introduced and it had no server share and no OEMs. Since then, it has signed up Dell (Quote), IBM(Quote), HP (Quote), and Sun(Quote).
"The inroads they've made in servers have been impressive. They went from zero to a respectable share. That's the reason we are in the environment we are in today, which is both companies being competitive," said McCarron.
AMD stock dropped four percent today after it reported earnings for the fourth quarter of 2006.
From here
AMD's native quad-core design picks up more steam
In a series of memos forwarded to DailyTech, industry insiders discussed the upcoming launch frequencies regarding AMD's next-generation architecture, previously dubbed K8L by AMD Executive Vice President Henri Richard. Since then, AMD has generally referred to the next-generation chips as the Barcelona family, although Barcelona specifically denotes the high-performance quad-core server processor codename.
Some details of next-generation AMD desktop processors, the Stars family, were revealed late last year.
The desktop equivalent of Barcelona, codenamed Agena, is the 65nm flagship of AMD's next-generation desktop processors. Launch frequencies were quoted at "2.4 - 2.6GHz." Previous roadmaps had indicated Agena would debut at 2.7 to 2.9 GHz. Agena will have a 2MB L2 and 2MB L3 cache per CPU. AMD's internal guidance denotes this as a 125W TDP processor. As the flagship, Agena will be the first next-generation desktop launch and is scheduled for Q3'07.
Kuma, the dual-core mainstream next-generation desktop processor was quoted as having launch frequencies of "2.0 - 2.9GHz." Unlike the quad-core Agena processors, Kuma will feature 1MB of L2 and 2MB of shared L3 cache. Kuma will launch with both 89W and 65W TDP variants, but Energy Efficient models scheduled for 35W TDP will follow shortly after.
Rana, the next-generation Sempron successor codename, will launch with frequencies in the 2.1 to 2.3 GHz range. The dual-core CPUs will feature 1MB of total L2 cache, but no L3 cache. Rana's TDP is rated at 65W. Rana will not launch with the Agena flagship; AMD roadmaps have the processor launching at the same time as the Energy Efficient Kuma processors, or approximately Q4'07 if the launch schedule holds together.
As previously reported on DailyTech, Stars processors will use AM2+ motherboards. These processors can plug into existing AM2 motherboards today given the proper BIOS updates, but without the AM2+ sockets Stars processors will drop down to the HyperTransport 1.0 bus speeds.
AMD's Agena FX codename also appears to still exist on the roadmap. The only difference at this point between Agena and Agena FX is that Agena FX will use the Socket 1207+ interface.
From here
From hereAMD WASN'T JOKING about Barcelona hitting Q2. I didn't believe it until a solid source came out and said the volume ramp is starting 'really soon'.
If really soon is defined as the end of the month, and you add in the 10-12 weeks it takes from shiny silicon pizzas in to pin laden chunks out, that would mean parts are available at the beginning of May.
It would not surprise me if it is trading yield out for time to market, so let's add a month before they are really available. That puts things at early June for volume, or when AMD said it would have it out. Minor miracles do happen. µ