Court names Talwars as accused

Status
Not open for further replies.

blr_p

Pilgrim
I could not believe this when i heard it !!

There is no way to show the Talwar's are guilty.

Therefore the court cannot prove a damn thing and will in fact end up exonerating them.

Not bad, get away with double murder then get the govt to absolve you of the crime.

Only in India.

:clap:

PS: They should have left it at the last stage with his name permanently tainted and allowed karma to take over :devil2:.
 
Abt time that the two are behind bars. :@

I too was thinking the couple shd be shamed to sch an extent that anybody and everybody shuns them.
 
From the very first day this incident happened and came in the media, I strongly feel that Arushi's mother has some role to play in this murder mystery ..
I might not be true, but just an instinct which is telling me that she has a huge role behind this case.
 
That was the word in the sector from day one that the parents are the culprits..

CBI is pretty much corrupt and driven by politicians but i guess they too cant carry this any longer and caved in.
 
SharekhaN said:
You think that is not going to happen already?
Don't follow ?

I think nothing will be found and they will be declared 'NOT GUILTY' and that will be the end of the story. This is actually a step backward from the current position.

Final score
Talwars 2 state NIL!

nehaladsul said:
If circumstantial evidence is to be considered, they definitely can be named as accused...
As a student of law, can you tell me when 'circumstantial evidence' has ever been sufficient to incriminate anybody ?

Yes, they can be named as accused but thats as far as it goes. And when the govt loses this case it will give the Talwars their name & life back.

And govt will tell anybody else, media incld, they tried and lost.

Happy ending :)
 
its a murky case , you guys have read all the media reports and made up your minds , could you guys just for a minute think if that guy is innocent what he is going through ? ... if there are 50% evidence for and there is 50% evidence against .... just leave it already ,

esp you blrp , you always advocate dont believe the mainstream media , read up and make your minds but here you are convinced that they did it... why in this case do you have such strong feelings?
 
kippu said:
its a murky case , you guys have read all the media reports and made up your minds , could you guys just for a minute think if that guy is innocent what he is going through ? ... if there are 50% evidence for and there is 50% evidence against .... just leave it already ,
And thats what will happen in the court.

kippu said:
esp you blrp , you always advocate dont believe the mainstream media , read up and make your minds but here you are convinced that they did it... why in this case do you have such strong feelings?
I did, i gave it what ? 2 years, and if you look in this thread, you're the only one that does not buy it. Are you really this naive.

It happens, there are intstances in life where the guilty do escape and nothing more can be done about it :(

Let this be a good kick in the pants for the country to wake up & improve its forensic practices and their enforcement.

Because on the face of it there is no difference between this & Benazir's case.
 
In a nation where everything can be bought with money including justice and proof pertaining to criminal cases, what else can be said?

I feel it was her parents who did it. Maybe it was a case of honour killing.
 
blr_p said:
And thats what will happen in the court.


I did, i gave it what ? 2 years, and if you look in this thread, you're the only one that does not buy it. Are you really this naive.


It happens, there are intstances in life where the guilty do escape and nothing more can be done about it :(

Let this be a good kick in the pants for the country to wake up & improve its forensic practices and their enforcement.

Because on the face of it there is no difference between this & Benazir's case.
Werent you the one constantly endorsing the contrarian view in many of the threads here?
And if someone else has a contrarian view to you is this the way you react?
Werent you the one going on with "Just cos you all believe in something that doesnt mean you are right" bla bla in so many other threads?

Better come up with solid facts that enforcing your views on others who disagree with you.
So much for the contrarian eh?
 
blr_p said:
As a student of law, can you tell me when 'circumstantial evidence' has ever been sufficient to incriminate anybody ?

Well, there are many but just to name the most popular and prominent ones, I would like to mention the following two:

1. Priyadarshini Mattoo Case

2. Jessica Lall Case

If you need any more case references, let me know. I'll be glad to help you out. :)
 
BOTTOMLINE : If they cannot solve a simple murder case such as this that to for well off individuals what chance does somebody less rich have.

Murder cases in UP do not have a good record, this is why ppl from that state are the most ardent advocates to arm themselves.

Law & order is the biggest casualty as a result of the failure to prosecute this case.

--- Updated Post - Automerged ---

nehaladsul said:
Well, there are many but just to name the most popular and prominent ones, I would like to mention the following two:

1. Priyadarshini Mattoo Case

2. Jessica Lall Case

If you need any more case references, let me know. I'll be glad to help you out. :)
So are you saying there is a chance that the parents can be found guilty here ?

I hope you're right.
 
blr_p said:
So are you saying there is a chance that the parents can be found guilty here?
Me saying anything here is not gonna make anything happen... :P

All I am saying is that the circumstances indicate that the hands of Mr. & Mrs. Talwar are not clean. Whether their hands are blood-stained remains to be seen...

I have been following this case closely (I have an inclination for Criminal Law) and if you ask me for my personal opinion, prima facie I believe that the Talwar couple is guilty.

But our law assumes the accused to be innocent unless proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt.



The Priyadarshini Mattoo & Jessica Lall cases took off coz there were people fighting for justice for the victims. In this case, the victim's own parents appear to be the culprits. Who will fight for justice for the victim under such conditions??
:(
 
Darthcoder said:
Werent you the one constantly endorsing the contrarian view in many of the threads here?
And if someone else has a contrarian view to you is this the way you react?
Werent you the one going on with "Just cos you all believe in something that doesnt mean you are right" bla bla in so many other threads?

Better come up with solid facts that enforcing your views on others who disagree with you.
So much for the contrarian eh?

GO through my position in the earlier thread on this subject.
 
nehaladsul said:
Me saying anything here is not gonna make anything happen... :P
Of course and maybe its too much to ask to predict the future.

nehaladsul said:
All I am saying is that the circumstances indicate that the hands of Mr. & Mrs. Talwar are not clean. Whether their hands are blood-stained remains to be seen...
True, but i think the evidence isn't enough here.

They found nothing last time what more can be done ?

nehaladsul said:
I have been following this case closely (I have an inclination for Criminal Law) and if you ask me for my personal opinion, prima facie I believe that the Talwar couple is guilty.
Good, i was just going on gut instinct.
 
blr_p said:
True, but i think the evidence isn't enough here.
That is where we need a slightly analytical approach...

True, that there is not sufficient direct evidence to prove the Talwars guilty but the law is not dependent only on the direct evidence. The circumstantial evidence acts as indirect evidence in such cases.

And I must mention that there is quiet a lot of circumstantial evidence in this case that cannot be ignored in the interest of justice.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.