N nfsfan Contributor Sep 1, 2006 #1 ok i know the diif is that the former is analog..and dvi is digital.but is there any serious difference in quality....also please advise me for a 17" lcd upto 12k....response time<10ms.....and should be solid....that is run without major faults....
ok i know the diif is that the former is analog..and dvi is digital.but is there any serious difference in quality....also please advise me for a 17" lcd upto 12k....response time<10ms.....and should be solid....that is run without major faults....
S samrulez Contributor Sep 3, 2006 #2 Samsung 740N is good with 8ms response time... DVI brings a little stability for LCDs....but not much diff....
Samsung 740N is good with 8ms response time... DVI brings a little stability for LCDs....but not much diff....
Shripad Innovator Sep 3, 2006 #4 Depends on LCD. Some LCDs which support both DVI and D Sub work better with one and suck with other input. Benq71E + is good example of that. The DVI improves the display quality drastically on this display.
Depends on LCD. Some LCDs which support both DVI and D Sub work better with one and suck with other input. Benq71E + is good example of that. The DVI improves the display quality drastically on this display.
C Chaos Keymaster Sep 3, 2006 #5 ^^Simple fact is if the LCD has DVI, the manufacturers don't optimize the VGA out and hence one gets poor quality on the VGA.
^^Simple fact is if the LCD has DVI, the manufacturers don't optimize the VGA out and hence one gets poor quality on the VGA.
K Kneo Explorer Jan 4, 2007 #6 Would it matter if the LCD does not have DVI and has mini D-sub instead ? Does it mean that its not as good as the ones have DVI ? I am talking about ViewSonic Q19wb
Would it matter if the LCD does not have DVI and has mini D-sub instead ? Does it mean that its not as good as the ones have DVI ? I am talking about ViewSonic Q19wb