Encrypted DNS Service by Cloudflare - 1.1.1.1

Status
Not open for further replies.
S

swatkats

Keymaster
Why 1.1.1.1 & 1.0.0.1?
  • Protects Privacy
  • No Data selling or Targetted Ads
  • Faster DNS than Google's 8.8.8.8
  • DNS Censorship


MOST OF THE traffic on the web is encrypted. And more websites are adopting basic encryption measures every day. That means that, in theory, eavesdroppers have a hard time seeing whom you're writing to on Gmail or what you're looking up on Wikipedia.

But there's a catch. Big sites like Google and Facebook can see what links you click from their services, and use tracking cookies to follow you around the web. Various tools can help you block this type of tracking, but another big window into your browsing habits remains. Your broadband provider or someone who has hijacked your internet connection could still see what sites you're visiting.

Communication between your device and the DNS resolver typically is unencrypted. You can get around this by using a service called a virtual private network, or VPN, which routes all your traffic through a single connection, essentially making it appear that you only visit one site. But an incorrectly configured VPN could still "leak" DNS information.

The new "DNS over HTTPS" protocol would fix that by encrypting communication between devices and DNS resolvers much the same way web traffic is encrypted today. The operator of a DNS resolver would still be able to see what sites you're visiting, but it would be much harder for outside parties to intercept that data. A similar protocol called DNSCrypt works with Cisco’s DNS resolver OpenDNS, but hasn’t been widely adopted.

The idea behind Cloudflare's service is that instead of using the DNS service offered by your broadband provider, you would go into your operating system's preferences and point to 1.1.1.1. You can do this today, but because most operating systems don't support DNS over HTTPS, your DNS queries generally won't be encrypted unless you’re using software that supports the standard, such as the test version of Firefox.

How to Setup on PC

Setting up 1.1.1.1 takes two minutes and requires no technical skill or special software. Even if you’re a computer novice, pick your device below for an easy-to-follow setup guide.

  1. Click on the Start menu, then click on Control Panel.
  2. Click on Network and Internet.
  3. Click on Change Adapter Settings.
  4. Right click on the Wi-Fi network you are connected to, then click Properties.
  5. Select Internet Protocol Version 4 (or Version 6 if desired).
  6. Click Properties.
  7. Write down any existing DNS server entries for future reference.
  8. Click Use The Following DNS Server Addresses.
  9. Replace those addresses with the 1.1.1.1 DNS addresses:
    • For IPv4: 1.1.1.1 and 1.0.0.1
    • For IPv6: 2606:4700:4700::1111 and 2606:4700:4700::1001
  10. Click OK, then Close.
  11. Restart your browser.
  12. You’re all set! Your device now has faster, more private DNS servers ✌️✌️

Source: https://www.wired.com/story/new-encryption-service-adds-privacy-protection-for-web-browsing/

Site: https://1.1.1.1/
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crazy_Eddy
Let's get the fact correct - the usage of a different DNS server, will NOT make you secure. You either install a VPN Server or get the VPN services being offered by various operators. And to debunk the truth, most of the Indian user DO NOT have the encryption at their home. Most of the time, people have been using the default password of the router or the one given by their internet operator :-)
 
  • Like
Reactions: pratikb, tommy_vercetti and nimod
Leaving all these foolish longings for privacy etc. aside, is this better than google dns?
 
Lord Nemesis said:
Lets get one more fact correct. Using a VPN does not make you secure. VPN providers can see your traffic and in many cases required by regulation to maintain detailed logs..
Click to expand...
Well in that case nothing is ever secure :-) Most of the VPN providers have a no logs policy, since they are outside the country they will not be covered by the individual country rules. Besides, you can setup your own VPN server.
 
manju_rn said:
Let's get the fact correct - the usage of a different DNS server, will NOT make you secure. You either install a VPN Server or get the VPN services being offered by various operators. And to debunk the truth, most of the Indian user DO NOT have the encryption at their home. Most of the time, people have been using the default password of the router or the one given by their internet operator :)
Click to expand...

The change of DNS will make your browsing secure - especially if you are using the default ISP settings. Most ISPs still have poorly implemented DNS servers, which are still vulnerable to DNS poisoning and more. And yes, seen this in 2 locations. Another advantage is that you might get around DNS blocks in place. And if we use the new security extensions to DNS, it will improve security.

Change of DNS will not make your browsing private.

Lord Nemesis said:
Lets get one more fact correct. Using a VPN does not make you secure. VPN providers can see your traffic and in many cases required by regulation to maintain detailed logs..
Click to expand...

+1.
 
  • Like
Reactions: swatkats
Julian said:
Leaving all these foolish longings for privacy etc. aside, is this better than google dns?
Click to expand...

Lord Nemesis said:
Better performance, but I doubt a difference of 20ms per resolution would be noticeable.
Click to expand...

Google DNS might be equivalent, especially if your ISP has proper peering. This was seen in ping response times - 8.8.4.4 was giving single digit response times or in the low 20ms vs 8.8.8.8., which was in the double or triple digits.

20ms can be noticeable, especially if you are running a huge network. For the smaller networks, nopes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NotMyRealName
How is the privacy with regards to google DNS. I trust cloudflare far more than google. Will I be able to use this directly in my router? Like with the encryption enabled. Its running on advanced tomato.
 
vivek.krishnan said:
The change of DNS will make your browsing secure - especially if you are using the default ISP settings. Most ISPs still have poorly implemented DNS servers, which are still vulnerable to DNS poisoning and more. And yes, seen this in 2 locations. Another advantage is that you might get around DNS blocks in place. And if we use the new security extensions to DNS, it will improve security.
Click to expand...
I think the more appropriate is that the change of DNS will make your browsing "more" secure. I think we do not want provide the readers that just by changing DNS, they will be protected from DNS spoofing and other internet attack. Majority of the users are trapped due to fake URLs given in emails, laziness in typing complete url, or by not installing an antivirus. There is another argument is whether moving to google DNS should be done or not - google already has so much of data that providing your internet fingerprint seems like topping them up. The same thing goes for the VPN providers as well, should you trust your ISP or VPN Provider.
For basic prevention, a IT literate user must check their hosts file, flush local dns, always ensure correct URL is entered for sensitive sites such as Bank

Party Monger said:
How is the privacy with regards to google DNS. I trust cloudflare far more than google. Will I be able to use this directly in my router? Like with the encryption enabled. Its running on advanced tomato.
Click to expand...
And why is that you trust Cloudfar more than google? Yes, you can configure any public DNS server in router. What do you mean by encryption enabled? Like you are connected to VPN provider through router? - even then yes, just that DNS leak may be reported by your VPN provider
 
vivek.krishnan said:
Google DNS might be equivalent, especially if your ISP has proper peering. This was seen in ping response times - 8.8.4.4 was giving single digit response times or in the low 20ms vs 8.8.8.8., which was in the double or triple digits.

20ms can be noticeable, especially if you are running a huge network. For the smaller networks, nopes.
Click to expand...

From a client perspective, You don't need to hit a DNS server every time you make a request. There are multiple levels of caches for DNS even in the local machine. There is one at OS level and browsers like chrome also maintain their own DNS cache. so unless you are making a huge number of DNS resolves for different names, you won't even be seeing requests to DNS server.

Some live stats on response times.

https://www.dnsperf.com/
 
manju_rn said:
I think the more appropriate is that the change of DNS will make your browsing "more" secure. I think we do not want provide the readers that just by changing DNS, they will be protected from DNS spoofing and other internet attack. Majority of the users are trapped due to fake URLs given in emails, laziness in typing complete url, or by not installing an antivirus. There is another argument is whether moving to google DNS should be done or not - google already has so much of data that providing your internet fingerprint seems like topping them up. The same thing goes for the VPN providers as well, should you trust your ISP or VPN Provider.
For basic prevention, a IT literate user must check their hosts file, flush local dns, always ensure correct URL is entered for sensitive sites such as Bank

And why is that you trust Cloudfar more than google? Yes, you can configure any public DNS server in router. What do you mean by encryption enabled? Like you are connected to VPN provider through router? - even then yes, just that DNS leak may be reported by your VPN provider
Click to expand...

I think I was speaking Latin. Oh well. I will try to be more specific next time.

DNS will not help if you are being targeted by Social engineering.

Basic prevention? I was laughing at that hosts part. You seem to have mixed up a software pirate and basic IT prevention, except for the last part about the URL.

And additionally, if you use OpenDNS which is part of the Cisco Umbrella, you can block most of the common families of ransomware. The problem is that it is breaking the DNS infrastructure by doing so, plus opens up to censorship debates.

Finally, coming to privacy - AFAIK, it is quite difficult to pinpoint you using your DNS. Most ISPs in India do multiple NAT which obfuscates the source IP.

Lord Nemesis said:
From a client perspective, You don't need to hit a DNS server every time you make a request. There are multiple levels of caches for DNS even in the local machine. There is one at OS level and browsers like chrome also maintain their own DNS cache. so unless you are making a huge number of DNS resolves for different names, you won't even be seeing requests to DNS server.

Some live stats on response times.

https://www.dnsperf.com/
Click to expand...

Quite true. I run multiple DNS servers for my workplace. For a company like mine, which is in the tens to hundred users, that 20ms does not matter much. But for companies which are much larger, that 20ms does make a difference. And on a slow connection, guess where that 20ms becomes....
 
@vivek.krishnan I had read an article some months back stating that ACT Fibernet was using deep packet inspection to block sites like streamable and the pirate bay. Can it be bypassed by using dnscrypt with something like cloudflare as the provider which has dns over tls(not much idea as to what this is exactly does)
 
manju_rn said:
And why is that you trust Cloudfar more than google? Yes, you can configure any public DNS server in router. What do you mean by encryption enabled? Like you are connected to VPN provider through router? - even then yes, just that DNS leak may be reported by your VPN provider
Click to expand...
Been following them for a long time. They aren't evil like google.

I know you can configure any DNS. My question specifically was about what protection this offers vs a non-encrypted dns & whether it will work as a drop in replacement for the non-encrypted dns in normal routers (tomato firmware specifically if someone has any idea). I dont use VPN, though there is an option directly in the custom firmware.
 
k_m_Arya said:
@vivek.krishnan I had read an article some months back stating that ACT Fibernet was using deep packet inspection to block sites like streamable and the pirate bay. Can it be bypassed by using dnscrypt with something like cloudflare as the provider which has dns over tls(not much idea as to what this is exactly does)
Click to expand...

I would say no, this would not help in those cases.
 
Code: 
 Final benchmark results, sorted by nameserver performance:
 (average cached name retrieval speed, fastest to slowest)

  192.168.  0.  1 |  Min  |  Avg  |  Max  |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
  ----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
  + Cached Name   | 0.002 | 0.003 | 0.008 | 0.001 | 100.0 |
  + Uncached Name | 0.015 | 0.117 | 0.346 | 0.099 | 100.0 |
  + DotCom Lookup | 0.056 | 0.140 | 0.216 | 0.023 | 100.0 |
  ---<-------->---+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
           Non-routable local internet address
                Local Network Nameserver


  208. 67.222.123 |  Min  |  Avg  |  Max  |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
  ----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
  - Cached Name   | 0.014 | 0.015 | 0.019 | 0.001 | 100.0 |
  - Uncached Name | 0.018 | 0.212 | 0.658 | 0.150 | 100.0 |
  - DotCom Lookup | 0.245 | 0.478 | 0.560 | 0.065 | 100.0 |
  ---<-------->---+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
                resolver1-fs.opendns.com
               OPENDNS - OpenDNS, LLC, US


  208. 67.220.222 |  Min  |  Avg  |  Max  |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
  ----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
  - Cached Name   | 0.014 | 0.015 | 0.018 | 0.001 | 100.0 |
  - Uncached Name | 0.019 | 0.218 | 0.687 | 0.171 | 100.0 |
  - DotCom Lookup | 0.321 | 0.478 | 0.613 | 0.074 | 100.0 |
  ---<-------->---+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
                  resolver4.opendns.com
               OPENDNS - OpenDNS, LLC, US


  208. 67.220.220 |  Min  |  Avg  |  Max  |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
  ----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
  - Cached Name   | 0.014 | 0.015 | 0.019 | 0.001 | 100.0 |
  - Uncached Name | 0.017 | 0.250 | 0.711 | 0.192 | 100.0 |
  - DotCom Lookup | 0.323 | 0.462 | 0.569 | 0.069 | 100.0 |
  ---<-------->---+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
                  resolver2.opendns.com
               OPENDNS - OpenDNS, LLC, US


  208. 67.220.123 |  Min  |  Avg  |  Max  |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
  ----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
  - Cached Name   | 0.015 | 0.016 | 0.020 | 0.001 | 100.0 |
  - Uncached Name | 0.019 | 0.230 | 0.663 | 0.170 | 100.0 |
  - DotCom Lookup | 0.326 | 0.476 | 0.571 | 0.072 | 100.0 |
  ---<-------->---+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
                resolver2-fs.opendns.com
               OPENDNS - OpenDNS, LLC, US


  208. 67.222.220 |  Min  |  Avg  |  Max  |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
  ----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
  - Cached Name   | 0.015 | 0.016 | 0.020 | 0.001 | 100.0 |
  - Uncached Name | 0.019 | 0.239 | 0.643 | 0.156 | 100.0 |
  - DotCom Lookup | 0.325 | 0.483 | 0.570 | 0.070 | 100.0 |
  ---<-------->---+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
                  resolver3.opendns.com
               OPENDNS - OpenDNS, LLC, US


  208. 67.222.222 |  Min  |  Avg  |  Max  |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
  ----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
  - Cached Name   | 0.014 | 0.016 | 0.020 | 0.001 | 100.0 |
  - Uncached Name | 0.016 | 0.245 | 0.702 | 0.181 | 100.0 |
  - DotCom Lookup | 0.259 | 0.469 | 0.577 | 0.082 | 100.0 |
  ---<-------->---+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
                  resolver1.opendns.com
               OPENDNS - OpenDNS, LLC, US


  198.153.192.  1 |  Min  |  Avg  |  Max  |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
  ----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
  - Cached Name   | 0.015 | 0.020 | 0.045 | 0.005 | 100.0 |
  - Uncached Name | 0.018 | 0.271 | 1.112 | 0.302 | 100.0 |
  - DotCom Lookup | 0.133 | 0.148 | 0.243 | 0.017 | 100.0 |
  ---<-------->---+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
          ··· no official Internet DNS name ···
              ULTRADNS - NeuStar, Inc., US


    8.  8.  4.  4 |  Min  |  Avg  |  Max  |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
  ----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
  - Cached Name   | 0.034 | 0.035 | 0.039 | 0.001 |  87.5 |
  - Uncached Name | 0.068 | 0.134 | 0.356 | 0.094 |  80.0 |
  - DotCom Lookup | 0.222 | 0.272 | 0.377 | 0.048 |  85.7 |
  ---<-------->---+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
             google-public-dns-b.google.com
                 GOOGLE - Google LLC, US


  129.250. 35.251 |  Min  |  Avg  |  Max  |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
  ----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
  - Cached Name   | 0.048 | 0.049 | 0.058 | 0.002 |  98.0 |
  - Uncached Name | 0.049 | 0.096 | 0.301 | 0.072 | 100.0 |
  - DotCom Lookup | 0.054 | 0.104 | 0.281 | 0.076 | 100.0 |
  ---<-------->---+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
                    y.ns.gin.ntt.net
     NTT-COMMUNICATIONS-2914 - NTT America, Inc., US


    1.  0.  0.  1 |  Min  |  Avg  |  Max  |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
  ----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
  - Cached Name   | 0.048 | 0.049 | 0.054 | 0.001 | 100.0 |
  - Uncached Name | 0.049 | 0.136 | 0.297 | 0.093 | 100.0 |
  - DotCom Lookup | 0.051 | 0.185 | 0.289 | 0.097 | 100.0 |
  ---<-------->---+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
            1dot1dot1dot1.cloudflare-dns.com
          CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US


  129.250. 35.250 |  Min  |  Avg  |  Max  |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
  ----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
  - Cached Name   | 0.048 | 0.050 | 0.060 | 0.002 | 100.0 |
  - Uncached Name | 0.049 | 0.110 | 0.284 | 0.079 | 100.0 |
  - DotCom Lookup | 0.055 | 0.125 | 0.361 | 0.090 | 100.0 |
  ---<-------->---+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
                    x.ns.gin.ntt.net
     NTT-COMMUNICATIONS-2914 - NTT America, Inc., US


    9.  9.  9.  9 |  Min  |  Avg  |  Max  |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
  ----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
  - Cached Name   | 0.048 | 0.050 | 0.069 | 0.004 |  98.0 |
  - Uncached Name | 0.049 | 0.118 | 0.302 | 0.084 | 100.0 |
  - DotCom Lookup | 0.050 | 0.095 | 0.123 | 0.031 | 100.0 |
  ---<-------->---+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
                      dns.quad9.net
                 QUAD9-AS-1 - Quad9, US


    1.  1.  1.  1 |  Min  |  Avg  |  Max  |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
  ----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
  - Cached Name   | 0.065 | 0.067 | 0.077 | 0.001 | 100.0 |
  - Uncached Name | 0.066 | 0.168 | 0.303 | 0.097 | 100.0 |
  - DotCom Lookup | 0.068 | 0.199 | 0.275 | 0.088 | 100.0 |
  ---<-------->---+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
            1dot1dot1dot1.cloudflare-dns.com
        MEGAPATH2-US - MegaPath Networks Inc., US


    8.  8.  8.  8 |  Min  |  Avg  |  Max  |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
  ----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
  - Cached Name   | 0.072 | 0.081 | 0.137 | 0.016 | 100.0 |
  - Uncached Name | 0.074 | 0.164 | 0.395 | 0.099 | 100.0 |
  - DotCom Lookup | 0.227 | 0.279 | 0.366 | 0.044 |  98.0 |
  ---<-------->---+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
             google-public-dns-a.google.com
                 GOOGLE - Google LLC, US
 
  • Like
Reactions: vivek.krishnan and nimod
swatkats said:
Code: 
 Final benchmark results, sorted by nameserver performance:
 (average cached name retrieval speed, fastest to slowest)

  192.168.  0.  1 |  Min  |  Avg  |  Max  |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
  ----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
  + Cached Name   | 0.002 | 0.003 | 0.008 | 0.001 | 100.0 |
  + Uncached Name | 0.015 | 0.117 | 0.346 | 0.099 | 100.0 |
  + DotCom Lookup | 0.056 | 0.140 | 0.216 | 0.023 | 100.0 |
  ---<-------->---+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
           Non-routable local internet address
                Local Network Nameserver


  208. 67.222.123 |  Min  |  Avg  |  Max  |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
  ----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
  - Cached Name   | 0.014 | 0.015 | 0.019 | 0.001 | 100.0 |
  - Uncached Name | 0.018 | 0.212 | 0.658 | 0.150 | 100.0 |
  - DotCom Lookup | 0.245 | 0.478 | 0.560 | 0.065 | 100.0 |
  ---<-------->---+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
                resolver1-fs.opendns.com
               OPENDNS - OpenDNS, LLC, US


  208. 67.220.222 |  Min  |  Avg  |  Max  |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
  ----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
  - Cached Name   | 0.014 | 0.015 | 0.018 | 0.001 | 100.0 |
  - Uncached Name | 0.019 | 0.218 | 0.687 | 0.171 | 100.0 |
  - DotCom Lookup | 0.321 | 0.478 | 0.613 | 0.074 | 100.0 |
  ---<-------->---+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
                  resolver4.opendns.com
               OPENDNS - OpenDNS, LLC, US


  208. 67.220.220 |  Min  |  Avg  |  Max  |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
  ----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
  - Cached Name   | 0.014 | 0.015 | 0.019 | 0.001 | 100.0 |
  - Uncached Name | 0.017 | 0.250 | 0.711 | 0.192 | 100.0 |
  - DotCom Lookup | 0.323 | 0.462 | 0.569 | 0.069 | 100.0 |
  ---<-------->---+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
                  resolver2.opendns.com
               OPENDNS - OpenDNS, LLC, US


  208. 67.220.123 |  Min  |  Avg  |  Max  |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
  ----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
  - Cached Name   | 0.015 | 0.016 | 0.020 | 0.001 | 100.0 |
  - Uncached Name | 0.019 | 0.230 | 0.663 | 0.170 | 100.0 |
  - DotCom Lookup | 0.326 | 0.476 | 0.571 | 0.072 | 100.0 |
  ---<-------->---+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
                resolver2-fs.opendns.com
               OPENDNS - OpenDNS, LLC, US


  208. 67.222.220 |  Min  |  Avg  |  Max  |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
  ----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
  - Cached Name   | 0.015 | 0.016 | 0.020 | 0.001 | 100.0 |
  - Uncached Name | 0.019 | 0.239 | 0.643 | 0.156 | 100.0 |
  - DotCom Lookup | 0.325 | 0.483 | 0.570 | 0.070 | 100.0 |
  ---<-------->---+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
                  resolver3.opendns.com
               OPENDNS - OpenDNS, LLC, US


  208. 67.222.222 |  Min  |  Avg  |  Max  |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
  ----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
  - Cached Name   | 0.014 | 0.016 | 0.020 | 0.001 | 100.0 |
  - Uncached Name | 0.016 | 0.245 | 0.702 | 0.181 | 100.0 |
  - DotCom Lookup | 0.259 | 0.469 | 0.577 | 0.082 | 100.0 |
  ---<-------->---+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
                  resolver1.opendns.com
               OPENDNS - OpenDNS, LLC, US


  198.153.192.  1 |  Min  |  Avg  |  Max  |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
  ----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
  - Cached Name   | 0.015 | 0.020 | 0.045 | 0.005 | 100.0 |
  - Uncached Name | 0.018 | 0.271 | 1.112 | 0.302 | 100.0 |
  - DotCom Lookup | 0.133 | 0.148 | 0.243 | 0.017 | 100.0 |
  ---<-------->---+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
          ··· no official Internet DNS name ···
              ULTRADNS - NeuStar, Inc., US


    8.  8.  4.  4 |  Min  |  Avg  |  Max  |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
  ----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
  - Cached Name   | 0.034 | 0.035 | 0.039 | 0.001 |  87.5 |
  - Uncached Name | 0.068 | 0.134 | 0.356 | 0.094 |  80.0 |
  - DotCom Lookup | 0.222 | 0.272 | 0.377 | 0.048 |  85.7 |
  ---<-------->---+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
             google-public-dns-b.google.com
                 GOOGLE - Google LLC, US


  129.250. 35.251 |  Min  |  Avg  |  Max  |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
  ----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
  - Cached Name   | 0.048 | 0.049 | 0.058 | 0.002 |  98.0 |
  - Uncached Name | 0.049 | 0.096 | 0.301 | 0.072 | 100.0 |
  - DotCom Lookup | 0.054 | 0.104 | 0.281 | 0.076 | 100.0 |
  ---<-------->---+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
                    y.ns.gin.ntt.net
     NTT-COMMUNICATIONS-2914 - NTT America, Inc., US


    1.  0.  0.  1 |  Min  |  Avg  |  Max  |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
  ----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
  - Cached Name   | 0.048 | 0.049 | 0.054 | 0.001 | 100.0 |
  - Uncached Name | 0.049 | 0.136 | 0.297 | 0.093 | 100.0 |
  - DotCom Lookup | 0.051 | 0.185 | 0.289 | 0.097 | 100.0 |
  ---<-------->---+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
            1dot1dot1dot1.cloudflare-dns.com
          CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US


  129.250. 35.250 |  Min  |  Avg  |  Max  |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
  ----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
  - Cached Name   | 0.048 | 0.050 | 0.060 | 0.002 | 100.0 |
  - Uncached Name | 0.049 | 0.110 | 0.284 | 0.079 | 100.0 |
  - DotCom Lookup | 0.055 | 0.125 | 0.361 | 0.090 | 100.0 |
  ---<-------->---+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
                    x.ns.gin.ntt.net
     NTT-COMMUNICATIONS-2914 - NTT America, Inc., US


    9.  9.  9.  9 |  Min  |  Avg  |  Max  |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
  ----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
  - Cached Name   | 0.048 | 0.050 | 0.069 | 0.004 |  98.0 |
  - Uncached Name | 0.049 | 0.118 | 0.302 | 0.084 | 100.0 |
  - DotCom Lookup | 0.050 | 0.095 | 0.123 | 0.031 | 100.0 |
  ---<-------->---+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
                      dns.quad9.net
                 QUAD9-AS-1 - Quad9, US


    1.  1.  1.  1 |  Min  |  Avg  |  Max  |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
  ----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
  - Cached Name   | 0.065 | 0.067 | 0.077 | 0.001 | 100.0 |
  - Uncached Name | 0.066 | 0.168 | 0.303 | 0.097 | 100.0 |
  - DotCom Lookup | 0.068 | 0.199 | 0.275 | 0.088 | 100.0 |
  ---<-------->---+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
            1dot1dot1dot1.cloudflare-dns.com
        MEGAPATH2-US - MegaPath Networks Inc., US


    8.  8.  8.  8 |  Min  |  Avg  |  Max  |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
  ----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
  - Cached Name   | 0.072 | 0.081 | 0.137 | 0.016 | 100.0 |
  - Uncached Name | 0.074 | 0.164 | 0.395 | 0.099 | 100.0 |
  - DotCom Lookup | 0.227 | 0.279 | 0.366 | 0.044 |  98.0 |
  ---<-------->---+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
             google-public-dns-a.google.com
                 GOOGLE - Google LLC, US
Click to expand...
What does that means technically ? on DNS POISONING or HIJACKING.. or .................. (the newsest stuff) ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom