asheshb said:Hi, I need a config for high end pc. It would be used for video rendering for software like 3ds Max, Maya. The budget is around 2.5-3 lacs. I would be greatful if someone can suggest me the config.
Because gaming is not your purpose I would suggest you to wait for at least one month before you go ahead with your PC. The reason why I am saying this is because Hardware industry is poised for a monumental shift now and in a month or two new technology is going to be mainstream and the present high-end is going to be 'old'. This will be specially true if you use your PC for 3D animation and stuff like that. For gamers, nowadays Core 2 Duo are more than enough.asheshb said:Hi, I need a config for high end pc. It would be used for video rendering for software like 3ds Max, Maya. The budget is around 2.5-3 lacs. I would be greatful if someone can suggest me the config.
asheshb said:Thanks tusharrastogi and everybody for your fast and valuable reply. god's_gift thanks for informing about coming technology but I cannot wait and have to get done this thing by next month.
Few questions remaining to ask. In the meantime I was going through other posts and was able to get some information. I wish to get these things clarified:
1. Processor: tusharrastogi you have recommended Q6600. Would there be much difference if I go for QX6700 or higher as suggested by vishalrao. If so then which one?
2. Graphic Card: Would it be better to have 2 8800GT 512 MB or 1 8800GTX 768 MB. Since the graphic card would be one of the most important thing so I do not want to take any chances.
3. Display: Since the system is going to be used for graphics so If some one can let me know which is the best available monitor performance wise.
Please let me know what do you think about it.
asheshb said:2. Graphic Card: Would it be better to have 2 8800GT 512 MB or 1 8800GTX 768 MB. Since the graphic card would be one of the most important thing so I do not want to take any chances.
Funky said:People people people..........
Comeon now. I expected better. ( Just 1 actually helpful and accurate reply )
Why are you guys recommending tri-quad sli for this application. Its useless for him.
asheshb m8 let us know your preference. I mean do you need single machine due to space limitations? If not you can build a economical farm but it will take up more space and power. If you want to save on power and space and wanna save in long term on your electricity bill, you have to look for server components with dual CPU upgrade options.
Tell me this and I will suggest accordingly.
sangram said:Quadro or FireGL cards are far superior at 3D rendering than the GT/GTS/GTX variety, though they are actualy based on the same core. The BIOS is coded differently and is optimised for screen render accuracy and speed, rather than page calculation (which is more critical for games).
There are softmods available to switch card types between each other, but those are not as effective as an actual Quadro card.
As for waiting, the Penryns will run cooler and faster than the current crop of processors. If you have jobs lined up and cannot wait for fear of losing revenue or meeting timelines, you should buy a platform now - I would actually recommend dual Xeons and a Quadro, rather than consumer/gamer platforms that are being suggested here. Stuff it with 8GB of RAM and you're good to go.
If you can wait, you'll have to wait till Feb or March 2008 till the Xeons based on 45nm/SSE4 appear, if not later. Consumer processors, though high quality, will not be as good as their workstation/server counterparts at this sort of stuff.
It's a business call.
If you need super-accurate color precision, then what you need is an NEC professional or Sony professional panel. I don't know how many people here have seen one, but these are not very large, mostly in 4:3, but can be super-calibrated to 99.5% accuracy on at least prints. They cost a bomb though, 3000 dollars for a super-calibrated LED (LED, yes) backlit panel from Sony. Mitsubishi CRTs are very good for this sort of stuff, and two Diamondtrons should be a little cheaper and get you similar accuracy.
I'm not sure that's your requirement unless you're doing game dev or print/web work. If it is architecture, modelling and mock-ups, you can get by with a smaller/cheaper monitor as even the cheapest LCDs are dimensionally 100% accurate, something CRTs can't claim. Just pick one based on your target resolution and you're good to go.
So my recommendation would be:
Intel Xeon X7340 x2 (8 cores)
Intel S5000 PAL OR Tyan equivalent
8GB RAM (16 if you can afford it)
QuadroFX5500/5600
A bunch of SCSI hard disks to run all this stuff - WD has some nice 15000 rpm drives, 137GB, that will work really well. SCSI, not SATA.
All this wil run off a couple of 300 watt supplies daisy-chained into a 600 watter, and will be housed in a nice rackmount case.
I think this will overshoot your budget a bit, but it'll be worth it.
Have fun.