It's difficult to ignore such bs articles you know. You open it and before you can close it you sucked into their world of crap. I also don't know much about the the editors. The only one whom I follow in kotaku is Brian Carter (I think), the guy who posts about Pokémon. I don't even read their gaming reviews. In fact i don't read any gaming reviews. Well at the most I simply scroll down the pages for the pictures. It would be great if there was an option to censor or hide all the retarded bs articles which these sites publish. I'd rather read a very obvious or fake post on buzzfeed similar. I can't completely unfollow them either because of the relevant news from the gaming industry which they sometimes publish so I'm kind of walking right in the middle.
I should mention that my last scuffle with these sites was with the chief editor of Verge lol. He and his followers got really salty when I asked him why they kept reposting shit about the iPhones. I even gave one real hard example in which they reviewed one flagship android phone a few months ago and in the cons they wrote "Not an iPhone" I mean like wtf? When I drilled him for a better answer he said it was his "opinions" and sided with one of his fan and complimented him for "logic and understanding" and I didn't. His last excuse was "don't follow if you don't like their posts". I guess that is their last form of defence. Not even facts! Its like one IGN's review of Pokemon game in which they wrote in the cons " Too much water." I mean like WHAT THE F![DOUBLEPOST=1466394669][/DOUBLEPOST]Gotta said that I'm so glad Hulk Hogan sued them and won. Though I feel bad for the writer whom I follow, inside I'm bursting with joy. hell yeah! Gawker media and other grade 3 self-claimed "journalism" sites should all just shut down.
I should mention that my last scuffle with these sites was with the chief editor of Verge lol. He and his followers got really salty when I asked him why they kept reposting shit about the iPhones. I even gave one real hard example in which they reviewed one flagship android phone a few months ago and in the cons they wrote "Not an iPhone" I mean like wtf? When I drilled him for a better answer he said it was his "opinions" and sided with one of his fan and complimented him for "logic and understanding" and I didn't. His last excuse was "don't follow if you don't like their posts". I guess that is their last form of defence. Not even facts! Its like one IGN's review of Pokemon game in which they wrote in the cons " Too much water." I mean like WHAT THE F![DOUBLEPOST=1466394669][/DOUBLEPOST]Gotta said that I'm so glad Hulk Hogan sued them and won. Though I feel bad for the writer whom I follow, inside I'm bursting with joy. hell yeah! Gawker media and other grade 3 self-claimed "journalism" sites should all just shut down.