madara_uchiha
Explorer
you said in your post that the nozzles vector thrust 32 degrees outward,nd not that they are mounted outward,changing your stance can hardly be considered smart.and what about your claim that its not true 3d thrust vector?that fell short of being true,why dont you blabber about that?HAHAHA! Shows --
My stupidity shows.
My logic fails, don't know who you are trying to fool. If they can buy that technology clandestinely fooling an MNC in the US's backyard I don't know what I have to put up to prove that Chine can develop designs and avionics by reverse-engineering things OR for that matter buying it on the Black.
I will be waiting for that day and would see how rapidly those will be supplied to the Air Force.
Still waiting on them to get to a production tempo of replacing the ageing fleet of Alouette III's and Cheetah's with the Dhruv. The Army might end up purchasing the Eurocopter Fennec.
KTHXBAI!
you dont have any evidence that they successfully reverse engineered a capable flcs so you brought up that they reverse engineered tech for their helicopters,was that evidence?no,and after i pointed that out,your main line of defence is"the chines can develop designs and avionics by reverse engineering things"sure they can,but didnt we just establish they cant since,they dont have any said tech to reverse engineer?but no,you went even furthur,how is it that you,who wanted to abolish the posting of conjecture is suggesting that china may have made some back door black market deals of none other then the flcs?
the fact that hal manufactures su30mkis isnt enough proof that we can manufacture rafales?even after we receive the how-to of it?need i remind you we will be manufacturing rafales,not developing them.your pessimism is not proof of anything,and i suggest you keep it to yourself.
again i reiterate your knowledge is indeed limited and inadequate,stop convincing yourself otherwise.