Is FD investment is really better than Real Estate ?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Being.smart

Galvanizer
Here are the calculations ...
getimage.dll


source : http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...-to-invest-in-realty/articleshow/34712813.cms

I request all intelligent people to take a look into it :-?
 
Interesting. please share more info like these for the Brainy Heads wondering on Techenclave. Sharing is caring :)
 
can anyone calculate, how would it will turn out, if we invest our cash component in real estate instead of taking loan :D
 
Property like land makes sense as investment when its for a long duration. i.e. for 10 years or more. Land is a limited quantity resource and as scarcity grows, value is going to increase. So, as long term investment it makes sense in most cases.

For short term, it might not make sense and might even be risky due to short term fluctuations and other costs particularly if you took a loan to cover part of the cost.

If things vary from case to case and hence the evaluation must be done case to case.

A colleague purchased a flat for 30 Lac and sold it for 45 Lac 3 years later. While it may seem like he got a profit of 50% He actually incurred a loss of 3 lac on the whole deal because he has taken a partial home loan and including the effective loan amount he paid, his final cost was 48 lac, but he got only 45 Lac.

On the other hand, In my case, we had purchased a couple of plots in my home town for a total of 4.5 Lac back in 1998. 15 years later, the value of these plots was 3.2 Crore. Show me any investment scheme where 4.5 Lac grows 70 times to 3.2 Crore in 15 years.
 
Property like land makes sense as investment when its for a long duration. i.e. for 10 years or more. Land is a limited quantity resource and as scarcity grows, value is going to increase. So, as long term investment it makes sense in most cases.

For short term, it might not make sense and might even be risky due to short term fluctuations and other costs particularly if you took a loan to cover part of the cost.

If things vary from case to case and hence the evaluation must be done case to case.

A colleague purchased a flat for 30 Lac and sold it for 45 Lac 3 years later. While it may seem like he got a profit of 50% He actually incurred a loss of 3 lac on the whole deal because he has taken a partial home loan and including the effective loan amount he paid, his final cost was 48 lac, but he got only 45 Lac.

On the other hand, In my case, we had purchased a couple of plots in my home town for a total of 4.5 Lac back in 1998. 15 years later, the value of these plots was 3.2 Crore. Show me any investment scheme where 4.5 Lac grows 70 times to 3.2 Crore in 15 years.

Don't expect that ,3.2 cr to grow 70 times in 15 years in land now.
 
Maybe not, but it has already achieved an increase that is impossible for any other standard investment route. Even if you assume that it barely doubles in value in next 15 years to say 7 crore at end of 30 years, you already got a lot of value out of your investment.

To compare, if I had taken the same 4.5 Lac and invested it as an FD @ 9% interest and let it grow for 30 years, I would only get 65 Lac (before tax) at the end of that period.

However, as I said before, it all changes case to case. One should not take decisions on investment blindly based on some guides without proper analysis of your own case
 
Status
Not open for further replies.