m.2 NVMe 256GB vs larger

Status
Not open for further replies.

PoBoy

Innovator
A 256GB SATA SSD generally doesn't perform as well as a larger capacity SATA SSD.

Is the same true for m.2 NVMe SSDs ?
 
Cache and DRAM makes the difference

Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus
250 GB500 GB1 TB
TurboWrite Capacity Default4 GB4 GB6 GB
TurboWrite Capacity Intelligent9 GB18 GB36 GB
TurboWrite Capacity Total13 GB22 GB42 GB
Sequential Write Performance (Up to) TurboWrite2,300 MB/s3,200 MB/s3,300 MB/s
Sequential Write Performance (Up to) After TurboWrite400 MB/s900 MB/s1,700 MB/s


ProductSamsung 970 EVO Plus 250GBSamsung 970 EVO Plus 500GBSamsung 970 EVO Plus 1TBSamsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB
DRAM512MB Samsung LPDDR4512MB Samsung LPDDR41GB Samsung LPDDR42GB Samsung LPDDR4
Endurance150 TBW300 TBW600 TBW1,200 TBW
 
A 256GB SATA SSD generally doesn't perform as well as a larger capacity SATA SSD.

Is the same true for m.2 NVMe SSDs ?
you just made a very vague statement. The difference between sata and nvme depends on lot of factors. to begin with the protocol (nvme vs sata/scsi)
are you planning on buying nvme drive?
 
For a relative. Wanted to get a 256gb one, for the lower price. Then realised that, maybe, larger capacity would perform better.

I knew 256gb 2.5" SATA SSDs are much slower than the larger ones.
 
Last edited:
From what I have heard, once the SSD fills up over 50%, it starts to get a bit sluggish. Something to do with available free space for swapping data or some such. My own SSD's are barely over 50% filled so I have never experienced it. But i have heard a lot of tech reviewers suggesting to keep a large portion of the SSD free.

I might be wrong though..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.