Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Feedback
View Statistics
Members
Current visitors
Buy Sell Trade
WTB
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Forums
Technology
Computer Hardware
Multicore Processors
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BullettuPaandi" data-source="post: 2512710"><p>This is off-topic, strictly speaking; but don't think this really merits a new thread. So, leaving it here and to the mods to move (sorry for the potential trouble), in case this gains enough traction in discussions.</p><p></p><p>I got reminded of typing this:</p><p></p><p>as I was watching the recent video from Hardware Unboxed comparing impact of cache vs cores on gaming.</p><p></p><p>[MEDIA=youtube]0mO4op3bL90[/MEDIA]</p><p></p><p>I also remember reading <a href="https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-5800x3d-linux" target="_blank">this</a> review of the 5800x3D showcasing the impact of cache on other applications on Linux.</p><p></p><p>It does seem like cache could be a significant selling point, if not already; and if the gaming industry AND the professional tools/softwares industry manages to help sell enough of these fat-on-cache processors, I don't know if the general consumer applications might could be designed for more cache, so much so that no RAM speed or capacity would make up for it.</p><p></p><p>I bet Chrome would use some cache; but that's simply because Chrome seems like the app that'd use anything and ask for more. I haven't used any professional softwares such as for video editing, 3d rendering, etc. so I don't know where more cache could be of help. But, I'm interested to know; so kindly share what you do.</p><p></p><p>Thanks!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BullettuPaandi, post: 2512710"] This is off-topic, strictly speaking; but don't think this really merits a new thread. So, leaving it here and to the mods to move (sorry for the potential trouble), in case this gains enough traction in discussions. I got reminded of typing this: as I was watching the recent video from Hardware Unboxed comparing impact of cache vs cores on gaming. [MEDIA=youtube]0mO4op3bL90[/MEDIA] I also remember reading [URL='https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-5800x3d-linux']this[/URL] review of the 5800x3D showcasing the impact of cache on other applications on Linux. It does seem like cache could be a significant selling point, if not already; and if the gaming industry AND the professional tools/softwares industry manages to help sell enough of these fat-on-cache processors, I don't know if the general consumer applications might could be designed for more cache, so much so that no RAM speed or capacity would make up for it. I bet Chrome would use some cache; but that's simply because Chrome seems like the app that'd use anything and ask for more. I haven't used any professional softwares such as for video editing, 3d rendering, etc. so I don't know where more cache could be of help. But, I'm interested to know; so kindly share what you do. Thanks! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Technology
Computer Hardware
Multicore Processors
Top
Bottom