Nikon D3100 Mini-Review

Nikon D3100 Mini-Review

nikon-d3100-digital-slr-camera.jpg

After a lot of confusion between buying a new Nikon D5000/Canon 500D or a used Canon 450D, i've finally brought the Nikon D3100. Since not many reviews of this camera are available, iam writing one myself based on my user experience with the camera & some 500 shots.

Disclaimer: Iam not a professional or have in-depth knowledge about photography. My DSLR experience is limited to just 4 (Sigma SD10, Sigma SD14, Nikon D40 & Canon 450D) & you can expect some comparisons between them in the review. I don't claim 100% accuracy in this mini-review.

Before starting off the review, i would like to explain why i chose this camera over the other contestants. Here's what was in my wish list & why i've to let off each one.
Nikon D3000/Canon 1000D: Was not looking for a bare minimum entry level model.
Canon 500D: Reviews said it had a bit more noise the raw files & raw headroom is limited. Was a bit concerned about that & let it off.
Nikon D5000: If the D3100 was not released anytime soon, i would have surely brought this. Liked everything about the camera except the articulated screen (personal dislike).

Lets start the review now.

Bundle: Pretty standard bundle, comes with an extra 4GB SD card & a nikon carry bag. Nothing exceptional here other than that the supplied camera bad is of top quality. In the first look it didn't even seem to be a part of the bundle (atleast for me).

Ergonomics: The first thing that comes to mind when holding this camera in hand is that how similar it is to the previous D40/D60/D3000. Grip is nice & confortable & the camera has a nice feel to it. Doesn't feel too bulky in the hand & is good for one handed shots.No complaints here.

Body & construction: The size of the body is same as that of the D60/D300. Bigger lenses would make the camera front heavy. If you want to add those XXL sized lenses, then this is a big no-no. The plastics seem to be of acceptable quality. The only thing to complain here is a small creaking in the SD-Card cover, not very much and can live with that.

Controls & UI: The button layout is virtually identical that of the D3000 except for the shooting mode lever & the live view activate lever + record button. It would have been really nice if nikon had added in a dedicated ISO button & a AF point selector button like in the 450D. Plus the live view activate lever seemed a lit odd for me, why did they not place a button for the purpose? The buttons on the left of the screen seemed to have a little lateral movement in the sockets which in my opinion gives a cheap feel. The overall tactile response of the buttons seemed good & is a pleasure to use.The UI is almost the same as the previous models with added menu items for the new features like HDMI, lens correction etc. The accelerometer can auto-rotate the display from landscape to portrait. The proximity sensor form the 450D is missing here which is a bit of letdown. The press twice to delete is a better way to deleting images than pressing two different buttons. One more glitch is that though the display gets tilted, the images are not. So we'll have to manually correct that after transferring to the computer.

Image quality: This is the toughest part of writing the review & since iam not a expert in determining the technical quality of images, iam writing down my views in layman's point of view. The last cam i used was a 450D (was a friend's) & i'll be making a bit of comparisons between them occasionally.

Most of the shots were taken in jpg & came out clean right out of the camera. At low ISO's the images seemed to have little or no noise. Even ISO 1600, the images looked pretty clean. At ISO 3200 noise starts becoming apparent & starts to erode the details, still remains okay for small prints. The two extended ISO modes Hi1 & Hi2 (equivalent to ISO 6200 & 12800) should be resorted to only in extreme conditions are the noise would be taking a fair chunk of the image. Please see the images & post in your comments regarding this.

Nikon's legendary matrix metering really does. I never has a bad shot (till now) owing to the bad metering performance. Combined with the Active D-lighting, it almost impossible to get a bad shot. I've noticed some issues using the 450D in high contrast situation where the camera tends to overexpose a bit or shadow details get washed away a little. One more thing i noted is that the 450D had issues shooting small things (like a dragonfly) up close. May be its the kit lens or my in-expertise, the fine details gets washed away & the shot gets underexposed most of the time. This did not happened in the D3100. The colors, saturation & detail levels seemed very good to me.

The shutter button has nice feedback to it & the shutter release is very quiet, it won't be needing the quiet mode with such a silent shutter. Image stabilization works great though i can't exactly say how much. The viewfinder is clear & the AF points seems to be very unobstructiong while composing the shot. Lens focusing sound is near quiet & AF is fast too.

A little bit of complaint here is the full auto mode which shoots all the way upto ISO3200 when used along with flash. May be there is a workaround, but i can't find that till now. Moreover i care little for that as i mostly shoot in P,A & S modes mostly.

To sum up, in the still image shooting part the D3100 left little not none for me to complain.

ISO Performance: Here's some shots of the same subject at all the available ISO's in the camera.

ISO 100, ISO 200, ISO 400, ISO 800, ISO 1600, ISO 3200, ISO 6400, ISO 12800.

http://yfrog.com/2sdsc0474bvjx

(All images were shot in RAW & converted to jpg using Capture NX2. No post processing applied. All shots were saved with 100% jpg quality except for the last image at ISO 12800 which was saved at 90% quality since 100% quality would exceed the file size limitation in imageshack which is 10MB)

Live view & Video Recording: These are the two features i care the least in a DSLR. The dedicated live view activation lever & video record button is a added bonus here. AF in live view seemed quick compared the 450D. I find the AF in live view to be very much usable. Videos looked good though isn't as good as a dedicated camcorder. Can't compare the video recording capability to any other DSLR's as i haven't used a DSLR with video recording before.

Battery life: After the first charge, the battery lasted for 500 shots. Flash used for approximately 20% of the shots, AF & VR used for all. So its pretty good. Since the batteries take some 2-3 complete charge cycles to achieve full potential, the battery life is expected to be a little more better.

Misc:

Since there is not inbody focus motor, a lot of the older lenses will not be able to AF. But this should hardly be a concern for the consumer segment to which the camera is targeted. Most of the users will not be looking forward to a huge array of lenses after buying this. For most users a 70-300mm tele or better a 18-200 superzoom plus a 50mm prime would suffice most of the needs.

3rd Party support for the Nikon D3100's .nef files is an issue as of now. Adobe camera raw isn't updated to support this camera till now & the only raw processing application that can be used now is the Nikon Capture NX 2.2.5.
Advantages:
* Excellent image quality
* Great high ISO performance
* Good right out of the camera pics
* Easy handling & good ergonomics
* Light weight
* RAW + Fine Jpg option
* Silent Shutter
* Fast AF
* In camera lens corrections
* Fast & responsive
* Easy to use menu system
* Clear viewfiender
* Good 3" LCD.

Disadvantages:
* Lack of some essential control buttons like DOF preview, ISO etc.
* Tiny body may be a bit of problem when using big lenses.
* Firmware issues like: auto iso in full auto mode, image rotation & file sequential numbering off by default. Hope nikon comes up with a firmware update to solve these.
* No focusing motor in the body means a lot of the older lenses would be incompatible.

Now to conclude, there is very little reason to no to recommend this camera to anyone who is looking forward to a entry-level DSLR. IMO this is the best out there in the segment & is worth every penny.

Sample Images:





More coming up..
 
Nice review ! Well structured and covered a lot of points without rambling. Though you did promise to compare with the Sigmas and your earlier Nikon. :P

But IMO you have largely downplayed the lack of the AF motor in the body. I would always recommend a 50mm f1.8 lens to ANY person who has more than a passing interest in photography and you can't AF with the Nikon 50mm f1.8 which IMO is the BEST 50mm f1.8 type lens in ANY camera brand.

But other than that I have always preferred Nikon cameras for their (IMO) superior ergonomics over the Canon Rebel series.

I dunno why but I have never liked any of the Canon Rebel series handling.
 
Good review, but as Brendon said no cheap 50mm Prime is a big negative IMO. The fast aspect of the lens gives you a lot more options to frame a picture, and not to forget a stellar low light performance. And a lot of your shortcomings on 450D, I havent come across in 1000D (or maybe I am not looking too closely). BTW here is a closeup of a dragonfly on my 1000D with kit lens :)

5044140078_cb1fb6a4c1_b.jpg


Couldnt get any closer...
 
BF1983 said:
Nice review ! Well structured and covered a lot of points without rambling. Though you did promise to compare with the Sigmas and your earlier Nikon. :P

But IMO you have largely downplayed the lack of the AF motor in the body. I would always recommend a 50mm f1.8 lens to ANY person who has more than a passing interest in photography and you can't AF with the Nikon 50mm f1.8 which IMO is the BEST 50mm f1.8 type lens in ANY camera brand.

But other than that I have always preferred Nikon cameras for their (IMO) superior ergonomics over the Canon Rebel series.

I dunno why but I have never liked any of the Canon Rebel series handling.

I could have compared the sigmas & the D40 with the D3100, but that wont be an apples-to-apples comparison.. It would be an all out one sided win for the D3100 if i did so.. Moreover there is not much point comparing those directly with the D3100..

Will be updating the thread shortly with the D3100 vs SD10, SD14 & D40..

I must confess that i underplayed the lack of an AF motor.. It was more of a personal preference also.. The only two accessories i'll be adding to the D3100 would be a Sigma 18-200mm OS lens & a Nikon SB-400 Flash.. Ofcourse both are not top of the line, but still i'd prefer versatility over extreme quality.. Ofcourse iam not denying the fact that the 50mm prime is a great piece of optics, but its second in the priority list for me..

IMO also nikon's ergonomics is better than the canon rebel's.. But one thing i should admit, i liked the looks (styling) of the rebels more than the D3100.. The D3100 looks so tiny that it looks more like a grown up prosumer than a shrunk down DSLR..
Aces170 said:
Good review, but as Brendon said no cheap 50mm Prime is a big negative IMO. The fast aspect of the lens gives you a lot more options to frame a picture, and not to forget a stellar low light performance. And a lot of your shortcomings on 450D, I havent come across in 1000D (or maybe I am not looking too closely). BTW here is a closeup of a dragonfly on my 1000D with kit lens :)
5044140078_cb1fb6a4c1_b.jpg

Couldnt get any closer...
I admit that that the lack of cheap 50mm's is a big downside for the D3100..

Regarding that 450D shortcoming, as i said in the review it could be my mistake also. I haven used the cam much & could not get the best out of it.. But nikon's always gave me outstanding results with little or no effort at all..

dsc0140cpps.jpg


dsc5439r.jpg


The first one was shot with the new D3100 & other with my good old D40.. Couldn't get any image barely close to this on the 450D.. One particular thing i noticed about that 450D i used is that, in 'P' mode, it automatically chooses comparatively low shutter speeds than the nikons (ISO & aperture being the same)..
 
The 35mm f1.8 AFS for around 12k is a good option too

I found the 50mm a bit difficult to use with a friends 400D as the effective 50 x 1.6 = 80mm is difficult for use when wide angle is needed....
 
^^ Actually thats the best part, I feel it makes you do the hardwork of framing and composing the picture. On the zoom lenses, you adjust the focal length and forget about the framing and composition aspect of photography. Atleast for me, I have consciously tried to frame the picture before clicking once I started using the 50mm Prime lens.

Besides I feel 50mm are unmatched for portrays, and if Brendon is saying Nikkor 50mm are the best, I dunno if he has got the Canon 50mm F1.4 into the picture. But if its better, then the Nikkor 50mm would be one hell of a lens, as the Canon 50mm f1.4, are as sharp as I have seen.
 
Nice review buddy... good sum up :)

However, I disagree U at some points.. but it hardly matters...

Aces170 said:
^^ Actually thats the best part, I feel it makes you do the hardwork of framing and composing the picture. On the zoom lenses, you adjust the focal length and forget about the framing and composition aspect of photography. Atleast for me, I have consciously tried to frame the picture before clicking once I started using the 50mm Prime lens.

It is because in case of prime lens we dont have a zoom ring in hand which makes our butts set a place and moving the ring from 18 to 200mm..

Thus we get brain and time to think about perspective and composition :P
 
Yeah primes are great for learning and thats why I mentioned the 35mm 1.8 :) .... I feel it would a better choice over a 50mm 1.8

I went to a event where they were showcasing the Nissan 350Z and I could not get the car into the frame with the 50mm as the space was very limited and moving back a lot would have meant going out of the view.... I know that a 50mm is not suited for what I was trying to achieve but I feel a 35mm offers more advantage over a 50mm.... Just my POV

Although a 35mm is effectively 52.5 but it would much wider compared to 80mm of a 50mm
 
Aces170 said:
Besides I feel 50mm are unmatched for portrays, and if Brendon is saying Nikkor 50mm are the best, I dunno if he has got the Canon 50mm F1.4 into the picture. But if its better, then the Nikkor 50mm would be one hell of a lens, as the Canon 50mm f1.4, are as sharp as I have seen.
I was referring to the cheaper 50mm f1.8 type lenses. :)

Nikon, Canon and Sony are all very sharp lenses and you find it hard to pick out which lens is sharper. However the Canon's bokeh is not as good as either the Sony or the Nikon and hence it comes in last place.

Its not bad mind you, just not the best in its segment.

The Canon 50mm f1.4 has very good bokeh and slightly better sharpness. :)

--- Updated Post - Automerged ---

ronnie_gogs said:
Yeah primes are great for learning and thats why I mentioned the 35mm 1.8 :) .... I feel it would a better choice over a 50mm 1.8

I went to a event where they were showcasing the Nissan 350Z and I could not get the car into the frame with the 50mm as the space was very limited and moving back a lot would have meant going out of the view.... I know that a 50mm is not suited for what I was trying to achieve but I feel a 35mm offers more advantage over a 50mm.... Just my POV

Although a 35mm is effectively 52.5 but it would much wider compared to 80mm of a 50mm
Err you are comparing two different tools !!!

Its like saying, I prefer a hammer rather than a scewdriver to drive a nail into the wall !!!

The 35mm f1.8 lens has very harsh bokeh and should ideally be used stopped down. A 50mm f1.8 lens has much smoother bokeh and you can use it easily at f1.8/f2 without issues.

And I am sure you will agree with me that there is a good 6k difference between the two lenses.
 
fantastic review there and a great heads up on the updated version of D3000, I have been eying an entry level DSLR for quite some time, I am gonna wait for some time til the price drops by a considerable amount, would you help us know what was the total price u paid for the camera (body + kit).
 
saurabhnarula said:
fantastic review there and a great heads up on the updated version of D3000, I have been eying an entry level DSLR for quite some time, I am gonna wait for some time til the price drops by a considerable amount, would you help us know what was the total price u paid for the camera (body + kit).
Though the model name D3100 suggests its an upgrade from the D3000, it has got more features than the much costlier D5000 (more pixels, newer image processing engine, better ISO performance & ofcourse with a slight letdown in fps speed)..

I've paid Rs.29,250/- for the whole kit.. Its well worth the price IMO..
 
@toxicdrift

The following lenses are pretty good

Nikon 10-24mm - $800
Nikon 17-55mm f2.8 - $900
Nikon 50mm f1.4 - $400
Nikon 85mm f1.4 - $2000
Nikon 200mm f4 macro - $1649
Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 VR II - $2000
Nikon 600mm VR - $10000

This system is a nice complete system. :)
 
brendon u have full plans to make me bankrupt. but will try to get these. maybe one for each bday hahaha will def get the 50mm though... any other must have's u think??

ronnie no budget really man,, needta get the good ones. but not a 10000$ one like brendon suggested haha :P
 
Back
Top