Nokia N95 a sneak peek

I bought this one for dad when it just came out...I am not impressed with this phone...Somehow I dont like it much.
Hangs once in a while, poor battery life, feels bit like cheap plastic...
But everytime I feel guilty buying that, I look at that screen and that soothes my senses :P
 
which part of the review is original???? Not even the images!!! and the only thing you did it yourself i.e font selection, you screwed even that.

These kinda copy and paste efforts are not appreciated here.
 
"As a Camera
In a way, it's a tribute to the Nokia N95's photographic ambitions that I'm comparing it directly to what, a year or so ago, was a top of the line standalone digital camera. But from the samples above, there are distinct limitations to having a much smaller sensor and lens, with slightly less detail in many images. The Nokia N93 produces optically perfect photos but with lots of the original sensor noise and (sadly) over-enthusiastic compression artefacts.
Which is better? It's down to your own eyes and preferences. To be honest, for most occasions outdoors, my (ok, Rafe's) Nokia E70 (fixed focus, 2mp) produces wonderfully coloured and 'pleasing' photos that are 'good enough' a lot of the time. But the Nokia N73, N93, N93i and N95 are about more than just pleasing snaps. They all have semi-professional aims, with focussing abilities that encourage experimentation and unusual subjects. That none of these devices really stands up under scrutiny in comparison with a standalone camera shouldn't come as a surprise - my current favourite phrase (from Star Trek) 'Ye cannae beat the laws of physics' applies here (as it will again in my N95 review feature on battery life) - there's simply no way a tiny smartphone lens and sensor can compete with dedicated camera optics and electronics.
BUT. Nokia has aimed the Nokia N95 unashamedly as a premium phone for the high street. This is the one they want every Tom, Dick and Harry to aspire to and they want to ensure that the device gives pleasing results for typical subjects (friends, family, pets, hobbies, etc). With the hope that newer firmware improves camera speed, I think Nokia will get more praise and respect than criticism."

where is the comparison??? It was a simple cut and paste hence the mistake???
specifications have been copied and the photographs have been copied, dont have the time to check the whole review but if the conclusion and photographs are copied then what else is left???

See out here write a small review, there might be grammatical mistakes etc., it might not sound like a professional review thats fine by us but not this.
 
my intention was not not copy paste or take the credit frnds. the intention was just to share the technical knowlege about the phone tht's all. comments like this sucks. if i want the credit then i would have not posted the actual url from where i have gathered the information. i won't be posting any more reviews if ppl are going to demotivate like this ....got it..
 
The whole idea of having a review section in TE is to post YOUR own reviews not reviews copied from some other site...u can copy the specifications and some images if you want but not the whole thing man...might as well post only the links..why bother typing it again?..
 
see if want to share technical information there is always the news section. Review section is to write your own review and your experience of using a particular computer/electronics item.
 
do not copy paste from other websites as it affects te's google ranking. if you want you can mention a few points and rephrase it in your own words and credit it to original source.

am leaving the thread open in case people want to discuss about the phone.
 
Back
Top