Far from it. There is a difference between practical/logical and being a subservient hater.
Case in point - My first GPU was a GeForce 256 SDR. My first DX10 card was a GeForce 9600 GT. My current card is a 3080.
Who doesn't know about 4090 or 5090 melting connector issue?
Knowledge of the issue isn't the point here - you're just contradicting yourself. You know of the melting connector issue, yet most of your responses were tailored towards Nvidia doing no wrong, and of the highest quality.
That is because unsupported PSU...
Really? What would your definition of a "supported" PSU be in this regard? I'm very curious to know with some concrete links to back it up, barring outliers. I'm happy to be corrected, otherwise.
As far as I know, almost all failures happened on "supported" PSUs. Also, you should also know that (in case you decided to skip reading actual information, which would contradict your very logical opinion) the melting connectors were caused due to an inherent design flaw by Nvidia.
Lastly, to quote from the linked article in response to your "unsupported" PSU theory:
"Melting occurs despite Corsair's first-party 600W 12VHPWR cable being used."
"The user avoided third-party cables and specifically used the original power connector, the one that was supplied with the PSU, yet both sides of the connector melted anyway."
Should we now blame Corsair for being at fault somehow, because Nvidia can do no wrong, in your opinion?
Here is some additional media that screams top-notch current-quality work from Nvidia:
I welcome counter statements from you for each point laid out above. I will happily stand corrected if the need arises.