CPU/Mobo Performace per clock: Deneb Vs Agena Vs Kentsfield Vs Yorkfield Vs i7

Status
Not open for further replies.

hatter

Inactive
Galvanizer








The second bars are for 1680X1050 No AA

Naturally, however, is not only how attractive is a platform that employs the majority of users. There are too many PC Enthusiasts, who is looking to one thing is clear: The performance. And on this issue, most people feel that the first Intel comes easily, using either the platform or I7 earlier Core 2.

But is it true. How can we be sure that the Intel CPU is so good, compared to the competition; The previous Review our extensive may cover many gaps, but left a lot of «outside»: A direct comparison to Clock per Clock among all major competitors, even between the 2 generations of AMD Phenom X4.

What would follow then be large, but certainly very interesting, which will help you all to take, as we think, very useful conclusions. First of all, the main part of this presentation is the Clock-2-Clock comparison between the Phenom II (Deneb), Core 2 Quad (Kentsfield & Yorkfield) and the Core i7 (Bloomfield) at 3.7 GHz, while you can see a direct comparison of the Phenom X4 (Agena) with Phenom II (Deneb), at 3.0 GHz.

Don't mind the language. It's all Google translator's work :P

Translated version of http://www.hwbox.gr/showthread.php?p=28351
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Status
Not open for further replies.