Hi,
Quick clarifications on rule no. 2 in the amended rules in Market section.
1. Does this mean that a trade without a pic is considered invalid?
I don't have a camera or other means to take a pic (maybe I personally do, maybe I don't, maybe I do and it doesn't work - the question is of the principle). I'm willing to let the buyer inspect the goods to his satisfaction, in action at a mutually convenient time. Heck I give my stuff for test drives before closing the deal.
How is a picture relevant in such a situation? It may help the sale, but does its absence suggest intention to dupe? In any case members do request pics from time to time, and sellers do oblige (I refuse many times, because the camera I have available makes everything look worse than it really is).
2. What is the meaning of 'clearly visible'? Is it a specification thing, is it an indication? Do we need to photograph one side, both sides, multiple angles?
I totally get the need of putting the member handle and date IF the pictures are a necessity - but I don't see that they are. The kind of stuff we trade on this forum - photographs aren't indicative of abuse and damage.
And if we are ruthless anyway (I've seen the big thread on that phone deal), we can find all sorts of ways to cheat people, if we really wanted to.
Back to the question: what is the picture supposed to prove (or prevent) that it is mandated by rule?
Thanks for the response.
Edit: If responding to a WTB post, is a picture mandated? It would seem from the rule that such a step is necessary as well!
Quick clarifications on rule no. 2 in the amended rules in Market section.
1. Does this mean that a trade without a pic is considered invalid?
I don't have a camera or other means to take a pic (maybe I personally do, maybe I don't, maybe I do and it doesn't work - the question is of the principle). I'm willing to let the buyer inspect the goods to his satisfaction, in action at a mutually convenient time. Heck I give my stuff for test drives before closing the deal.
How is a picture relevant in such a situation? It may help the sale, but does its absence suggest intention to dupe? In any case members do request pics from time to time, and sellers do oblige (I refuse many times, because the camera I have available makes everything look worse than it really is).
2. What is the meaning of 'clearly visible'? Is it a specification thing, is it an indication? Do we need to photograph one side, both sides, multiple angles?
I totally get the need of putting the member handle and date IF the pictures are a necessity - but I don't see that they are. The kind of stuff we trade on this forum - photographs aren't indicative of abuse and damage.
And if we are ruthless anyway (I've seen the big thread on that phone deal), we can find all sorts of ways to cheat people, if we really wanted to.
Back to the question: what is the picture supposed to prove (or prevent) that it is mandated by rule?
Thanks for the response.
Edit: If responding to a WTB post, is a picture mandated? It would seem from the rule that such a step is necessary as well!