sibot said:I was about to say Intel GMA 4500
TheIndian said:Intel on board for AMD - that should be interesting.
But even other wise is the intel 4500 solution better then 785?
Therefore, the comparison to Intel is an inevitable one. The direct price competitor to the 785G is Intel's G41, a horribly crippled and price reduced version of the G45 chipset. You lose PCIe 2.0 and any sort of H.264/VC1 video decoding abilities, all in exchange for a lower price. It just gets worse from a feature viewpoint when combining the ICH7 Southbridge with it. From this perspective, there's just no real reason to pick the G41 platform over a 785G configuration. Intel is resting on its ability to sell crappy chipsets with really good CPUs, and AMD is relying on a great chipset to sell a, well, pretty good CPU as well.
dvijaydev46 said:@OP: If your intention is gaming, a 790GX will be better than a 785 plain and simple. But the 785 tends to better at HD offloading.
785G may be a lower number than 790GX, but its performance is just as good, if not better. Its support for the same Crossfire arrangement in discrete GPU mode is excellent. Its continuation of SidePort memory is fantastic and its DX10.1 graphics additions are fantastic. If you’re looking at 790GX or 785G, we recommend 785G hands down.
vij said:The 790GX seems to score best in many benchmarks.
The graphics core in the 785G is upgraded from the HD3200/3300 utilized in the 780G/790GX to the HD4200. The primary difference between the cores is that the HD4200 fully supports DX10.1, Unified Video Decoder 2.0 (UVD), hardware accelerated picture in picture capabilities, dynamic contrast, HQ video scaling, hardware accelerated video transcoding, and full Powerplay support. The graphics core still runs at 500MHz (in current form) and at least in our particular sample, we were able to reach 1057MHz without too much trouble.
What does all this mean? For one, thanks to the HD4200, AMD finally offers multi-channel LPCM audio output plus additional hardware video accelerated functions. As far as performance is concerned, expect a 5%~ 15% performance increase in games.
hunt3r said:^^TTM they're just speculating here. The difference in core clock speed cannot be made up. Maybe they're predicting that dx10.1 will increase performance. Outright performance goes to the GX for sure
And the multi channel LPCM thing is false, they clarified later that it still supports only 2 channel LPCM.
Edit: Though if you meant overclocking the graphics, then both might overclock to the same level i guess
The graphics core in the 785G is upgraded from the HD3200/3300 utilized in the 780G/790GX to the HD4200. The primary difference between the cores is that the HD4200 fully supports DX10.1, Unified Video Decoder 2.0 (UVD), hardware accelerated picture in picture capabilities, dynamic contrast, HQ video scaling, hardware accelerated video transcoding, and full Powerplay support. The graphics core still runs at 500MHz (in current form) and at least in our particular sample, we were able to reach 1057MHz without too much trouble.
Karthi007 said:Budget Please.
Asus M4A785TD-V-EVO-6.5k
Has HD4200 IGP. The best IGP till date.
Also has 128MB DDRIII side port memory. So pretty much most powerful IGP till date.
Easily available everywhere and also a ATX mobo.
comp@ddict said:^^^lynx-india online...
where do u live?