Proof that 0.999 = 1

Status
Not open for further replies.
LOL!

9.999... - 0.999... != 9

They are rounding 8.999999xxxxxx9991 to 9. Not possible. :bleh:
 
OK, I missed the "bar" and "dot dot dot" part :ashamed: I wish I could turn back time and not post this thread.
 
Desecrator said:
LOL!

9.999... - 0.999... != 9

They are rounding 8.999999xxxxxx9991 to 9. Not possible. :bleh:
Er..I dont get it, isnt 9.999... - 0.999.. supposed to be equal to 9?

How come its 8.9999999xxxxxxx9991 ? :S
 
Proof that 1 equals 2:-

a = b

a^2 = a*b

a^2-b^2 = a*b-b^2

(a+b)(a-b) = b(a-b)

(a+b) = b

a+a = a

2a = a

2 = 1

Obviously, its mathematically wrong because at one point you are dividing each side of the equation by 0. But still fun. xD
 
XTechManiac said:
Proof that 1 equals 2:-

a = b

a^2 = a*b

a^2-b^2 = a*b-b^2

(a+b)(a-b) = b(a-b)

(a+b) = b

a+a = a

2a = a

2 = 1

Obviously, its mathematically wrong because at one point you are dividing each side of the equation by 0. But still fun. xD
that's some tedious proof.

What happens actually is like this :

9*0=0

8*0=0

since, 0=0

hence 9*0=8*0

therefore 9=8, people cancel '0' which of course is wrong. Replace '0' with any variable like 'a' and people get confused.
 
Mephistopheles said:
Er..I dont get it, isnt 9.999... - 0.999.. supposed to be equal to 9?

How come its 8.9999999xxxxxxx9991 ? :S
*facepalm*

By the logic there,

9.9-0.99 = 8.91

9.99-0.999 = 8.991

9.999-0.9999=8.9991

Continue the decimals to infinity, do you still not get it? :|
 
Desecrator said:
*facepalm*

By the logic there,

9.9-0.99 = 8.91

9.99-0.999 = 8.991

9.999-0.9999=8.9991

Continue the decimals to infinity, do you still not get it? :|
*facepalm*

That is okay, but IINM

9.9-0.9 = 9

9.99-0.99 = 9

Continue the decimals to infinity, still 9
 
Mephistopheles said:
*facepalm*

That is okay, but IINM

9.9-0.9 = 9

9.99-0.99 = 9

Continue the decimals to infinity, still 9

OK so who is denying that? Would you mind reading that logic given in the first post before you continue?

a = 0.99, multiply both sides by ten yielding 10a = 9.9. Then, subtracting a (which is 0.99) from both sides we get 10a - a = 9.9 - 0.99, which reduces to 9a = 8.91 and thus a ! = 1.
Do you still not get it? About time you revisit the school then. EOD.
 
Ok, I get it now :ashamed: [If that indeed was the flaw]

But isn't 0.99...= 0.999... I mean I can always write 0.99.. as 0.999... (IINM it makes no difference)

So by that, 9a = 9.9.. - 0.99..

a = 9

EOD? Such arrogance in people these days..sigh!
 
Mephistopheles said:
Ok, I get it now :ashamed: [If that indeed was the flaw]
But isn't 0.99...= 0.999... I mean I can always write 0.99.. as 0.999... (IINM it makes no difference)
So by that, 9a = 9.9.. - 0.99..
a = 9
EOD? Such arrogance in people these days..sigh!

It does make a lot of difference cause the person has to prove .999 is equal to 1 without rounding off anything

0.99 != 0.999 != 0.9999 != 0.9999....

If you want to round off 0.999 can be easily equal to 1

Example :-
Say your Long lost Uncle :P has 1 billion dollars and you are getting
1 billion - 0.99 X 1 billion = 1,000,000,000 - 990000000 = 10000000
Say someone says lets give the guy with multiplication by 0.999 since he thinks 0.99 = 0.999
1billion - 0.999 x 1 billion = 1,000,000,000 - 999000000 dollars = 1000000

So in the end you lose $10000000 - $1000000 = $ 9000000

Thats 9 million dollar lose :P
 
Mephistopheles said:
I mean I can always write 0.99.. as 0.999... (IINM it makes no difference)
You can. Probably in high school math it may not make a difference. But it would in reality. Consider precision machining industries where every μm matters. Take a simple case, a vernier calliper or a screw gauge - it gives a more accurate reading compared to a 3 Rs. ruler. An added decimal definitely has a value.

Processor's manufacturing technology goes in scales of nm (1 nm = 0.000000001 m) . The new slim Sony PS3's Cell/RSX underwent a change in the manufacturing process from 90nm (both from the first gen.) to 40nm and 45nm (RSX and Cell resp.) -this reduced the power consumption and the YLOD cases of the device drastically. Is there a difference between 0.00000009 and 0.000000045? Not much because you can approximate it to 0 just as you could approximate the above figure. But would it matter here? Definitely.
 
Desecrator said:
You can. Probably in high school math it may not make a difference. But it would in reality. Consider precision machining industries where every μm matters. Take a simple case, a vernier calliper or a screw gauge - it gives a more accurate reading compared to a 3 Rs. ruler.

Processor's manufacturing technology goes in scales of nm (1 nm = 0.000000001 m) . The new slim Sony PS3's Cell/RSX underwent a change in the manufacturing process from 90nm (both) to 40nm and 45nm (RSX and Cell resp.) -this reduced the power consumption and the YLOD cases of the device drastically. Is there a difference between 0.00000009 and 0.000000045? Not much because you can approximate it to 0 just as you could approximate the above figure. But would it matter here? Definitely.
That is okay, but Im not talking about rounding off 0.999 to 0.99, talking about 0.99..to infinity = 0.999..to infinity (Correct me if Im still wrong)
 
@Mephistopheles 0.99...... = 0.999... Fine but why r u trying to prove 0.999 = 1 :P

0.999 != 1
0.999.... != 1

And can never be equal no matter what.... period :D

PS : Read my example again u r not getting 1 billion.. your share was 1b x (1 - 0.99) :P
 
Status
Not open for further replies.