PC Peripherals The Physics Processing Unit poll !

Status
Not open for further replies.
actually i don'r know much about PPU's ..... yeah i know i started the thread but i haven't done much reserch ....anyways for now i will think that i will stick with GPU based solution ...... if nvidia lauches different SLI solution i mean smaller card like 6600GT with high end card and smaller card for physics solution it will be best :D ....

EDIT: i think this thread sud be in the graphics card section
 
Sorry not interested in accelerating physics. Pc gaming is expensive as it is.:P

Point is I am very very interested..... it is the cost factor which is stopping me.... I have no money for anything :( :cry:
 
I'll like to see how it get implemented. If its only used for eyecandy like particles and explosions, then its no use. If the physics actually affects gameplay, that'll be something :D
 
wait and watch for now, and honestly i wont justify spending 10k on it just yet.

They should bring it out cheap. A PPU more expensive than mainstream GFX card simply does not make sense. It should be more like $140-150 or max 5-6K here then i might just go out and buy one the day it comes out. But i know thats not gona happen.
 
I will like to skip this thing if I can... with 100 titles rolling I doubt it... but still. Yeah, if it can be had in say Dual-PPU (single PCB) PCIE 4X for about $250.. then I will get one right away as I dont need to upgrade PPUs every 8-10 months.
 
Me neither, dont need one and dont plan to buy one. One thing i dont understand is why cant they just integrate a ppu unit onto the gpu itself or even a separate ppu on the same pcb. and it can share the Vram as well. Obv they want to rip us off :@ but it would mean a lot more revenues for aegia from licensing tech that will sell in millions of gpu's than from selling maybe a couple of thousand/ten thousand ppu's. Size wont be a factor as the current ppu is fabbed on 150 nm iirc. If they can go to even 110 nm if not 90 the size can be reduced quite a bit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.