Private Ryan said:
Had an argument with dad about the same today..

I think, tht the ram setu is no human made bridge from ramayana, but is a geographical feature of the earth...there is no documented evidence tht it is man made..n given the tech(if it existed) of tht time, its impossible for human beings to have created it..
but Dad, like many other thinks tht all these things are beyond proofs n science..n no logics of today can define these things..:no: though i may not disbelieve in the fact tht ram n the rest existed..but they may have been just like u and me..ie. normal human beings..they were prolly made to look like god thru the ages of undocumented folklores...:no:
I find it hard to believe tht there were any such things are demons, flying udan khatolas (putting leonardo da vinci n the wright brothers to shame..

), n magical powers...if it was thr, then why has all tht disappeared now?? Why are human beings so frail now?? ITs all because everything has a documented proof nowadays...so its not easy to fool ppl with tales of might n magic...
huh? :rofl:
I'll put up a reply by taking some experts from some newsreports.
Was Krishna god? - No he was a man
Was he blue? - No he was black.
Was buddha god - No he was a man.
Did kurukhshetra happened? - Ofcourse.
You see the concept of God in Hinduism is very very different than how you think it to be.
Can you bring prove of the winged horse (buraq) that took Prophet Mohammed to heaven in one night from Jerusalem? It will be nice if we can also get proof of virgins giving birth and corpses coming alive and flying skywards. But then, these are topics which when investigated will soil Congress' collective dhoti.
Can you give us any proof of the very existence of Jesus? Oh, the desperate christoterrorists (Ambika soni and some others who ordered this to be drafted). Well, why don't they iterate in the same loud voice how there is evidence that Jesus never existed. In other words, not absence of evidence for
Jesus the christian man-god-who-never-was, but how in fact there is evidence he could not have been. "Jesus of Nazareth" - and other such inane impossibilities. Says it all really.
One does not require evidence that Rama Setu was man made to protect it. For example, there is absolutely no evidence that Jesus existed, yet Christian shrines are protected as a mark of respect for Christian sentiments. There is no evidence that Allah exists or that Muhammad flew out to the heaven on a horse in an overnight expedition, yet the mosque that purports that story is protected as a mark of respect for Christian sentiments.Nothing more, nothing less, Hindus believe that Rama built a bridge in that area. It is sacred waters for the Hindus. It must be protected. One cannot have double standards.
Similarly as I said Ram was a man if you go by absolute scientific points, however you need to realise the issue here it is with that of sentiments. But yet The dharma gives you much flexibity to consider Ram as a man and also peoples that considers him as God.
For many he is only God and for many he is one among many God, Dont mistake what I'm stating for polyatheism. It is short of mistaking the wood for the tree. The bewildering diversity of Hindu belief - theistic, atheistic and agnostic - rests on a solid unity. "Ekam sath, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti", says the Rig Veda: The Truth (God, Brahman, etc) is one, scholars call it by various names.
What the multipicity of deities does indicate is Hinduism's spiritual hospitality as evidenced by two characteristically Hindu doctrines: The Doctrine of Spiritual Competence (Adhikaara) and The Doctrine of The Chosen Deity (Ishhta Devata). The doctrine of spiritual competence requires that the spiritual practices prescribed to a person should correspond to his or her spiritual competence. The doctrine of the chosen deity gives a person the freedom to choose (or invent) a form of Brahman that satisfies his spiritual cravings and to make it the object of his worship. It is notable that both doctrines are consistent with Hinduism's assertion that the unchanging reality is present in everything, even the transient.
So If Ram is reverred by millions by God not only in India in most of Asia for literally thousands of years why not protect a place which is sentimental for it?, go to East Asia, Bangkok, Thailand they cannot think without Ram, Angorwat temple in Cambodia rings any bell? If no Ram was there bharata? Valmiki? Do you realise of you take out the word Ram thosuands of big/small kingdoms in Asia to what not would become redundant i.e. your assuming all of such kingdoms were absolute fools to even consider the existence of Ram.
To speak honestly I'm kind of aethiest but I can see the balant social engineering while your failing to do so. You will be compelled to think 'I need proof for this to beliefe' while others will 'trample through your way' and 'you wont seek proof to believe the other way' because you have been socially engineered the same way, this is a part of divide and rule policy.
Your absolutely beefooling yourself if you dont see the history of world order and how religion plays a big big role in it. The very reason NO scientific developement in India was encouraged and sanctioned were in placed more or less right from when we got independence has to do with the FACT that we are not in the anglo-saxon world order.
Now coming to 'documentation'. Your talking about documentation? what is documentation? Who documented what First? You mean like the British census of 1800 which documented over 2000 groups in various places and branded them under 'Schedulded Castes and Tribes', the burden of which we face even today from the commies stating oh Hinduism created 3000 castes so give them Quotas for all? Or you mean how William Jones from 1800 tried to 'document' and 'manufactured' the Aryan Invasion theory just to relate it with Noah's great flood and somehow link it with the Bible and world order of that time? you want me to state how Ram was documented in ancient times? there are lots of references and it will fill pages, I hope you understand the difference between
Ittihasas and
Puranas the very Ramayana falls under
Ittihasas the other one being Mahabharata and it literally means 'what has happened', so for now lets simply say what the 'colonalists' documented of Ram Sethu, go through the down article.
Please read this,
SPECIAL STORY
This will give you insight only what the 'Colonialists' documented, afterall they taught us including Persia/Greece/Rome/China that our history is false and their history is correct until science (read : from archeology to genetics) is proving/proved them wrong repeatedly.
This is a very dangerous tactic that today hindus are being required by court to prove his faith. And that too in India.
Government of India then says there was no proof to prove Ram's existence, How this any different from what the Marxists, Macaulayites and Missionaries say anyway? Why not be it GOI's official position then? Where does the position of GOI to keep religious sensitivity goes now? or it is okay as far as Hindus are marginalised?