UT2k7 Specs released

Status
Not open for further replies.

dipdude

Forerunner
Source : Freakygaming The site is down.

Preliminary UT2007 System Requirements

Minimum Requirements

CPU: 2.8Ghz
RAM: 512MB
Graphics: Geforce 6 series

Recommended System
CPU: 3-4Ghz
RAM: 1024MB
Graphics: NVIDIA 6800GT/Ultra or 7800GT/GTX SLI

UT2007 Technical features and requirements
  • * Dual-core CPU: Multi-threading is supported and should provide much better performance
  • * 64-bit version to be available with better textures
  • * Renderers: SM3.0, 2.0, possible DX8 renderer
  • * HDR supported
  • * Physics: Novodex Physics Engine
  • * AGEIA PhysX PPU supported.
Keep in mind that these are not official requirements from Epic, nor final. What we know is that the game will take advantage of technologies such as dual core processors, AGEIA compatible Physics chips and Shader Model 3.0.

Thilo Bayer, Editor-in-Chief PCG Hardware, adds:
As I clarified in a seperate e-mail with Mark Rein, we have some misunderstanding in the term "minimum specs". We mean "minimum specs for high in game detail" which is not the same as bare "minimum specs" so that the game runs at all.
 
i don't think UT99 gameplay was good .... it was the multiplayer which rocked and still i used to play on lan ...... :)
 
what does gameplay mean rahul. gameplay means multiplayer. & i dont think ut99 was a sp game. the sp game was unreal 1 & not unreal tournament.
 
i agree with stormblast...nthing really is as good as classic UT....but yeah this is the game tht every 1 is gonna check out for sure...:)
 
I wouldn't be surprised if UT2k7 multiplayer is a bit of a disappointment, like Quake 4 was. It won't necessarily be bad (just as Q4 isn't) but it will be perceived so, since it's difficult to measure up to the competitive gameplay of Q2, Q3 or UT99.

EDIT: LOL@Sesar, welcome to TE - tired of the other forums? ;)
 
RiO said:
I wouldn't be surprised if UT2k7 multiplayer is a bit of a disappointment, like Quake 4 was. It won't necessarily be bad (just as Q4 isn't) but it will be perceived so, since it's difficult to measure up to the competitive gameplay of Q2, Q3 or UT99.

...u guys didn't even try UT2004...i have played all (UT99, cpma, OSP) for a considerable time period wid more then "decent" players..it was just as gud (plz don't flame me, just pointing out something)

LOL@Sesar, welcome to TE - tired of the other forums?

no man..kawa still rocks..the generation change effect is taking its toll though :(

I wouldn't be surprised if UT2k7 multiplayer is a bit of a disappointment

no chance...epic always delivers :P, but it will be new that's for sure...they bringing it closer to UT classic (don't know if it was THAT g8 game, personally i think some ppl can't find fun in a game where rocket launcher is not the primary weapon =\)...but they said tehy won't just dump UT2004 elements..so i m hopeful and interested
 
goldenfrag said:
Is the AGEIA PhysX available?

If yes, Where?

If not, when will it be available? :/.

Nope, its being pushed back, last heard it was supposed to debut in dec 05. I hope it dies a slow and painful death :P We don't need a 300$ card when the same can be achieved by optimising the game for dual cores and thru gpgpu application.
 
K...

Yup, i see no point too. With the Arrival of Dual Core CPU's and Quad Core, which Intel wants to debut by the end of the year. :/.
 
....those might be the minimum system requirements but we all (or some of us unfortunate enough to have had low spec pcs at one time, or still do) know how felxible the unreal engines are. so actually speaking if you had a 1.5 ghz comp with 512mb ram and say something better than an fx 5700 the game would run on low detail, that too pretty smooth. infact, i played ut2004 on my p3 1ghz with 512mb ram and an fx5200 @ medium-high detail, 800x600x32.

and i think ut2k7 would be better than all other unreal tournament games so far (according to the screenshots and gameplay videos), the same way as 2k4 was better than 99 with the huge array of maps, player models and ofcourse much better gameplay and graphics. not that any of the earlier unreal games were anything lower than 9.5/10
 
I knew a 6800GT would run it fine but actually being one of the recommended gpu's is a bit surprising, especially for the kind of graphics UT2007 has.

When the UT2003 demo came out, I played it on an Athlon 800mhz, Radeon 7500 64mb and 256mb sdram and it ran pretty well at 1024.
The leaked alpha ran fine on a TNT2 lol.
 
IceFusion said:
lolz sesar saale....wht do u mean by in the mind of quakers :P
srry i meant "die hard Quakers" :P
well what i meant was die hard Quakers need Rocket launchers....they just hate ne game that dosen't puts it on top...many quakersl like PK and call it "new" & "fresh" :S they r obviously lying!!!....its nothing more then quake in turbo mode(yes i played bout 30 hrs of PK too) and the many die hard quakers call Ut2k4 only aim while UT classic is regarded as "complete"...wow

...these guys ever played Ut2k4 properly??they use to say same stuff bout UT calssic.... :S gud movement wid g8 aim always cancels any cheap tactics out and UT2k4 maps are much better then UT classic's(wid the exception of dm_de_ironic and ya deck 17 is crap)...most keep gameplay fast and flowing (unlike Q4)...

combat is not focued around "hit scan" weapons(felt very fresh) or whatever terms are used to point out rocket launchers...fast shock rifle wid a balanced sniper(lightning gun) and a adjusted flak cannon are the majour changes

tweaked armour system means much more patience and planning is necessary and grabbing armour and keeping note of its time is much more crucial

Shieldgun rocks and helps in delivering close games...

Scores are often close in UT games (those who have seen them know it), which puts a lot of emphasis on elements like map control, enemy awarness, armour timings etc etc.

i can specify much more stuff but i am getting lazy now

--------*---------

plz tell me what else do u require to make a gud duel game???......and ya A REALLY STABLE and relativly LESS Resource Hogging game engine!!!!

ps- I am not comparing Quake and UT..i am just comparing Ut classic wid Ut2k4 elements and the views of ppl on that
 
Status
Not open for further replies.