Hmm, I can name two other foreign ministers that were more consequential.The best one yet. No debate on that.
He's quite the politician. Seems to play more to the home crowd than his main audience which is the world. Though I'm sure he'd claim that as well.ABSOLUTE DEFINITION OF A DIPLOMAT !
How do you rate his handling of 370 revocation? Was it not big enough a problem?But has he pulled India's balls out of the fire like the other two? No
Why do you think so? Tharoor lives in the colonial Anglo-centric world. He still wastes time litigating stale grievances. Besides, we don't know what dirt his party bosses (i.e. secret services) have on him. His wife's death is still a mystery. There may be even more.I think tharoor would have been bette
370 handling was more down to Amit Shah and the interior ministryHow do you rate his handling of 370 revocation?
In what sense?Was it not big enough a problem?
Internal was the easy part.370 handling was more down to Amit Shah and the interior ministry
In what sense?
The problem has always been parliament from what I understand
They couldn't and neither could the PA because it was a political move and it was a coup for us.The fact that pakistan's friends didn't make it a big deal indicates some very sophisticated back end diplomacy.
pretty mid. we got raked over hot coal all the same. everyone thought we were being unreasonable for removing Article 370, and he was never sufficiently able to convince the world that restrictions put in place were justified.How do you rate his handling of 370 revocation? Was it not big enough a problem?
Why do you think so? Tharoor lives in the colonial Anglo-centric world. He still wastes time litigating stale grievances. Besides, we don't know what dirt his party bosses (i.e. secret services) have about him. His wife's death is still a mystery. There may be even more.
The world SJ is navigating is very different. Even though he can sound aggressive at time, he is far better suited for the current environment than a back room dealer like Tharoor.
You are going to get a push back (esp from the west) whenever you change the status quo. The real question is, how things end up in the long run. 1971 was quite bad, but everyone accepted India's position in the end. Same for the nuclear explosions. Will everyone accept India's position on JK, lets revisit after a few decades.pretty mid. we got raked over hot coal all the same. everyone thought we were being unreasonable for removing Article 370, and he was never sufficiently able to convince the world that restrictions put in place were justified.
now there's that, forget about 2019, check out whats going on with post OP Sindoor delegations. MEA dropped the ball so hard on this. majority of delegations were greeted with mid to high level representative , nearly all of them did not even publicly acknowledge the delegation let alone supporting india. delegation to the US met zero US govt officials and only just conducted a press conference. Whole world thinks us attacking the pakis was the usual india-pak bs, no one thinks our actions were justified, heck more people today believe in the pak version of events than indian. now in all of this, where is our esteemed external affairs ministers ? lets be real, if he fails to garner unequivocal global sympathy after that nazi/isis level barbarism then he's just another indian politician to me. concerned about his core voterbase and nothing more.
i half agree with your point. that the west does not endorse change readily. but the sheer fact that we could not rally the world after such heinous attack remains a glaring failure on our part no matter what. you know i have very good american friends, on the night we counter-attacked they asked what happened and would india further escalate. you might be shocked to know that they had no idea what had happened in kashmir , all they knew was tourists were killed. and they're people i have known for 7-8 years now. they know their geopolitics, but all the media they consumed had sanatized the coverage. you tell me what has our external affairs minister, or rather mea done to counter that ? what did they do to counter op sindoor falsehoods coming out of pak?You are going to get a push back (esp from the west) whenever you change the status quo. The real question is, how things end up in the long run. 1971 was quite bad, but everyone accepted India's position in the end. Same for the nuclear explosions. Will everyone accept India's position on JK, lets revisit after a few decades.
If you have the courage to create facts on the ground, the world will adjust to it.
Although many (both on left and right) claim that India is a status quo power, we are not. There are a lot of unresolved issues in our region that need addressing. Dismantling Pakistan is one of them. We should just do what is needed and weather the backlash.
I agree with the delegation part though. Not sure how useful it it.
This is the main problem according to me. Western media in its coverage is almost always biased when it comes to India, I rarely see any western media posts praising any initiative by the current govt, while anything which is perceived to be remotely wrong is hounded upon and I think this is mainly due to Modi's image prior to the 2014 election.but all the media they consumed had sanatized the coverage
The fact that you compared that incident to nazis and isis as a benchmark shows how effective the biased western media(including the movies, television) is in setting the narrative.lets be real, if he fails to garner unequivocal global sympathy after that nazi/isis level barbarism
This is just blind support for a dumb minister . Nothing but whitewashing inefficiency with laser eyes graphics .If I have to guess, our foreign minister with his sharp rebuttals using facts is trying a different approach like contesting the credibility of the west(and its media) and also indirectly saying that we are at a point where we don't care what they think.
Honestly the way he is handling our image in the world is incredible. The responses he gives to ultra biased news reporters is nothing but music to my ears.
After 26/11 the whole world supported us . A supposedly weak PM and FM were able to garner support , caught and killed terrorists and the victims did get some kind of a justice .its not about jaishankar or modi / bjp or congress. the sheer fact that we failed to globalise this barbarism, the fact that people beyond india, see this as yet another india-pak bs rather than for what it was is a resounding failure of our nation, and i would say a slap on the face of the families of the victims. those families, people who suffered in poonch with shelling, can all rest assured that they wont be getting justice. india is at this point incapable of bringing any lasting and meaning accountibilty - heck we are not having ay meaningful dialogue on security lapses that led to the attack in the first place. also the entire international community is indifferent of our sufferings because we are either so incapable or so inconsequential that they dont give two shits about what we suffer or not as long as it doesnt lead to nuclear annahilation.
Now this is abject bullshit. What about the pics where Pak's army tops were praying with dead bodies of terrorists and them saying even if their entire family is lost, it doesn't matter. And Pak compensated them in few crores of Pak monies ? And those pics being used by Shashi Tharoor in international diplomatic discourse ?Not even 1 dead corpse among the destroyed buildings .