See , this Pakistan vs India exists because of the West .
That post have nothing to do with your new claim:
The reason for Pak's split from India during independence period is obvious, everybody know that, no need of explanation.
Now this is even more funnier, no sensible leader in any part of world would like to see such a free movement with Pak.
If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck.
They are doing business in Dubai, following the rules of that place. Don't think they will do anything which harms nations interest.
Trying to get favorable coverage in western media is a tall order. All EAMs will fail this test.
but there's no other way, if we want to get more investment, we need favorable western coverage. sure, your big time investor could pull up some india expert and that dude will clarify the ground level situation for the corpo. but other smaller investors, some fund who wants to park money, some company which wants to procure some small product. they will skip india for sure. and its not just about media, let me tell you another anecdotal tale. my american friend took this class in his college on some business study something for few credits. in that class his professor was someone who was involved with running india business, he told them in class why india cant compete with asean , not even china. points he raised was you know the usual, shit infra , corrupt govt, politically motivated labour union, but the most he said was, even if they overcome these issues, they had hard time finding smaller overseas investors to get to invest into india because they think india is a hopeless case thanks to media.
If you think we've got it bad you should see what the Israeli have to put up with
Yeah and he talks to them bluntly.
At the UN when we got 10 senior cadres of the LeT designated as international terrorists.
who was caught and killed? When did it happen
Hehe, nah. We left our mark there. Why were there funerals attended by senior military figures no less if no dead corpses. Why is govt of pakistan offering Masood Azhar compensation for lost relatives
Jaishankar calling out the EU problems is probably why the EU did not enmasse support India and went ahead to give pakistan their loan ?If you think we've got it bad you should see what the Israeli have to put up with
Literally hostile anchors rabidly attacking their spokespersons who it must be said possess biblical patience when dealing with such morons. Unlike the Russians (Lavrov or Putin) who just shut these idiots down mocking them by saying 'you want serious talk or chat show discussion' and move on to the next journalist.
Sky UK is a good example of leftie hostile to Israel/ Russia media. So it was most surprising for me to see the way Sky UK sympathetically handled India.
They got an Afghan origin Aussie journalist who had hosted the Raisina dialogues in Delhi a number of times so well clued up to our position to interview the Pak defense minister
Small wonder she caught him out. Couldn't think of anyone better for the job from an Indian perspective.
Yeah and he talks to them bluntly.
Lines like,
Europe's problems are the worlds problems but the worlds problems are not Europe's problems
...really underline just how blunt and how point blank western directed
Something I notice Israeli spokespersons cannot do with the world but domestically their public agree with the underlined part
So it seems like Jaishankar is playing more to the domestic gallery than the international audience. It's his style I suppose. Projecting a confident and preparing the world for a future more assertive India.
At the UN when we got 10 senior cadres of the LeT designated as international terrorists.
who was caught and killed? When did it happen
Hehe, nah. We left our mark there. Why were there funerals attended by senior military figures no less if no dead corpses. Why is govt of pakistan offering Masood Azhar compensation for lost relatives
Seeing the HQ at Muridke blown up as it was must have felt good for the Bombay people.
There is psychology involved here and it benefits governments who take the risk
Imagine you get beaten up and you do nothing
Imagine you get beaten up and go blow up the house(s) of the assailant(s) who did so. The whole world sees you do so with impunity.
What is the difference?
Tactically and operationally successful. Isn’t it.
US is more responsible for IMF loans than EU considering the US were the ones responsible for setting it up after WW2.
Got any sources. I'm very interested to know who among the people we listed as responsible at the time has been bumped off since.
The Pak PM saying so himself?
Pakistan vs india debate can get quite heated. But i disagree with your statement. It is not just because of the west. Separatists in our country are to be blamed aswell
the most deluded reply on this forum goes to .....
The US were the ones who put those Nukes in Pakistani hands . Just like the current Syrian President who was once a designated terrorist is now the president of Syria , courtesy the USA .
Separatists are not new in India . They have been there from the time the British ruled us . British actively engaged in divide and rule not just with religions but even with castes within religions like Hinduism and Buddhism . Such kind of separatists were aided , funded by the west and different ideologies were funded by different countries . An example of how things work at govt levels . watch this youtube video .
When the resolution of the monitor is 320p .. how can it process UHD ?
No, it was the Chinese before they signed the NPT.
In India. But nothing could be done about the people who orchestrated the attack. Isn’t it. No acknowledgement let alone justice.
Pakistan's "trust me, bro" response on a Wikipedia page is something to consider?
How do you know the West did not play a role and used China , made the Chinese insecure about India ?
Who is the west here?
Well, It was on the news world over , since they were forced to accept that the terrorists originated from Pakistan . That was then when we had a proper , accountable govt which had a decent approach towards foreign relations and countries .
Who is the west here? - It does not mean only the US . It means Europe as well . Even today the UK holds a good amount of sway over the US on their policies and agendas .
That is what I am aldo saying .Earlier govts averted war ,reached out to international communities ,were civil and the whole work narrative was against pakistan.
Bruh... What side are you on? So you are saying we should have gone on an all out war? Luckily for us, sane voices in govt and army chose ceasefire over mindless annihilation of millions of people in a war. A war that was best avoided proves that we are pussy cats? You are those persons who will blame the establishment just for the sake of it. "Damn if you do and double damn if you don't."
Seems you need AI enabled in your processor to comprehend what I have posted . I have clearly said we should have gone the diplomatic route buy the supreme clown insisted on retialiation and went on with his grandoise plans until Trump showed him his place .Bruh... What side are you on? So you are saying we should have gone on an all out war? Luckily for us, sane voices in govt and army chose ceasefire over mindless annihilation of millions of people in a war. A war that was best avoided proves that we are pussy cats? You are those persons who will blame the establishment just for the sake of it. "Damn if you do and double damn if you don't."
