Since I have decided to get a new X38/X48 motherboard for my 4850 Crossfire, I am thinking whether I should get a new processor as well.
I currently have an E6600 running at 3.0 GHz.
My rig is mainly used for gaming and occasionally running some heavy code compilation (>5000 source files which takes more than an hour on dual core) and some other processor intensive tasks/tools.
one thing I would like to say before hand is that I do not like to over clock extremely, I run the processor at the speed that does not result in too much heat or system un stability.
My current choices
E8400
45nm Process, Runs at 3.0GHz, 1333MHz FSB default and over-clockable to 4.0GHz easily. Multiplier 9. But its still a dual core. Costs 8.5k approx
E7200
45nm Process, runs at 2.53Ghz, 1066Mhz FSB. Multiplier 9.5, since its a 45nm proccy, its should be as much over-clockable as the E8400 without loosing out on stability or heat generation aspects. costs only about 6k
Still these are both dual core, is it any worth upgrading to either of these form an E6600?
On the quad core front
Q6600
65nm Process, runs at 2.4 GHZ, 1066Mhz FSB, Multiplier 9, 8MB cache, inspite of the higher multiplier, quad on a 65nm process means higher heat generation and so lesser over clockability. Costs 9.8k
Q6700
65nm process, runs at 2.66GHz, 1066Mhz FSB, Multiplier 10, 8MB cache, same shortcomings as the Q6600, dont know about cost and availability, If its 12k, it would be a nice otpion, otherwise no intention of spending more than 12k on processor. Any idea about the price?
Q9300
45nm Process, runs at 2.5GHz, 1333Mhz FSB, Multiplier 7.5, 6MB cache, It has a lower multiplier and cache is less. But its 45nm processor, so should be able to run cooler even at higher clocks. costs about 12k.
I am not sure which one I should go for. should I buy now or is anything better (price cuts/more value for money processor) coming up before Nehelam.
I currently have an E6600 running at 3.0 GHz.
My rig is mainly used for gaming and occasionally running some heavy code compilation (>5000 source files which takes more than an hour on dual core) and some other processor intensive tasks/tools.
one thing I would like to say before hand is that I do not like to over clock extremely, I run the processor at the speed that does not result in too much heat or system un stability.
My current choices
E8400
45nm Process, Runs at 3.0GHz, 1333MHz FSB default and over-clockable to 4.0GHz easily. Multiplier 9. But its still a dual core. Costs 8.5k approx
E7200
45nm Process, runs at 2.53Ghz, 1066Mhz FSB. Multiplier 9.5, since its a 45nm proccy, its should be as much over-clockable as the E8400 without loosing out on stability or heat generation aspects. costs only about 6k
Still these are both dual core, is it any worth upgrading to either of these form an E6600?
On the quad core front
Q6600
65nm Process, runs at 2.4 GHZ, 1066Mhz FSB, Multiplier 9, 8MB cache, inspite of the higher multiplier, quad on a 65nm process means higher heat generation and so lesser over clockability. Costs 9.8k
Q6700
65nm process, runs at 2.66GHz, 1066Mhz FSB, Multiplier 10, 8MB cache, same shortcomings as the Q6600, dont know about cost and availability, If its 12k, it would be a nice otpion, otherwise no intention of spending more than 12k on processor. Any idea about the price?
Q9300
45nm Process, runs at 2.5GHz, 1333Mhz FSB, Multiplier 7.5, 6MB cache, It has a lower multiplier and cache is less. But its 45nm processor, so should be able to run cooler even at higher clocks. costs about 12k.
I am not sure which one I should go for. should I buy now or is anything better (price cuts/more value for money processor) coming up before Nehelam.