RTX 5060ti Official India Price starts at Rs 42,000

I

ishashank

Forerunner
This 16GB model will be priced around Rs 47,000 and is launching tomorrow: April 16, 2025, whereas the 5060 non ti version will start at Rs 33,000 and will arrive in May, 2025.

RTX-5060-ti-performance-1024x574.jpg


Source: https://geeksynk.com/rtx-5060ti-official-india-price-starts-at-rs-42000/

https://www.nvidia.com/en-in/geforce/graphics-cards/50-series/rtx-5060-family/
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: imad7x, YeAhx, desiibond and 5 others
16GB 5060ti for 47k, does it offer the double the raw performance of the OG GTX 1080, without scaling?, I got that back in 2017 for 46.2k. I want to see what we get these days for the same price.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: yothisisyo
Heisen said:
16GB 5060ti for 47k, does it offer the double the raw performance of the OG GTX 1080, without scaling?, I got that back in 2017 for 46.2k. I want to see what we get these days for the same price.
Click to expand...
Yes it should be double. 4060ti was 1.6x the performance of 1080. 5060ti will be 20% better than 4060ti, hence around 2x.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Heisen
All of this outrage over pricing is getting old, especially as people continue to throw money at Nvidia. Yes, prices have decoupled from performance gains and nothing suggests this will change. Nvidia has pricing power and they're using it. They are a publicly-traded, for-profit company and their allegiance is to the shareholders, not gamers (who are an increasingly smaller source of revenue). None of this is surprising, let's move on.

Also, I'd genuinely like to know: as chips get increasingly advanced i.e., move closer to the technological frontier, is it even realistic to expect dramatic performance improvements?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DigitalDude, TheGoldenHorde and PunkX 75
immolationepoch said:
Also, I'd genuinely like to know: as chips get increasingly advanced i.e., move closer to the technological frontier, is it even realistic to expect dramatic performance improvements?
Click to expand...
Yeah definitely. Look at the TDP for these cards, they are going down, making them efficient. Look at the best cards, 5090 is leagues ahead of 4090 which was leagues ahead of 3090. They can easily give more cores on their mid range cards and make them better.

Look at the bus width of cards. 2060S launched before 2020 has 256bit whereas 5070 released this year has 192 bit bus.

Nvidia knows the competitor is not giving better price to performance than what they did 2 gens ago, why would they be generous and reduce their profits? They are reaping their first mover’s advantage now.
 
Last edited:
immolationepoch said:
All of this outrage over pricing is getting old, especially as people continue to throw money at Nvidia. Yes, prices have decoupled from performance gains and nothing suggests this will change. Nvidia has pricing power and they're using it. They are a publicly-traded, for-profit company and their allegiance is to the shareholders, not gamers (who are an increasingly smaller source of revenue). None of this is surprising, let's move on.

Also, I'd genuinely like to know: as chips get increasingly advanced i.e., move closer to the technological frontier, is it even realistic to expect dramatic performance improvements?
Click to expand...
You have to accept that you are getting ripped off if you are buying a GPU this year, but price aside, it is the sheer audacity of Nvidia to apply shrinkflation to every non-flagship product that is more outrageous. Every product needed to be at least a tier up and they have cut down the hardware on purpose.

You still can get very decent uplift from a new micro architecture as well as process node, but again Nvidia chose the cheapest path because they know they can rip off desperate gamers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheGoldenHorde, Mohan997, Heisen and 1 other person
I might be in a minority here, but This looks like a nice upgrade over my 2060 super which I bought for 32k back in 2020. Now if 5060 ti 16GB is somewhere around <50k, I might buy it without a second thought. I agree with the sentiment that Nvidia is practically forcing us to pay premium but this is how GPUs have always been. Even 1060 was sold for around 24k which was premium considering 960 was around 15k.
 
If cherry-picking had a name and APPLE was taken it would have been called NVIDIA. Notice how they made RTX 20 series be the baseline here. Like we all enabled RT on 20 series lol. Look at that 5.7/5.8x multiplier. SO MUCH FPS WOW. No way, RTX 5060 TI is going to be 5.8 times better than RTX 2060 Super in RT?. Just amazing performance. And let's not talk about Resident Evil 4 here.
Also this is what it says below the graph "1440p, Max Settings, DLSS Super Resolution and DLSS Ray Reconstruction on 50, 40, 30, and 20 Series. Frame Gen on 40 Series. Multi Frame Gen (4X Mode) on 50 Series. RTX 5060 Ti and 4060 Ti 16GB models."
Frame gen on 40 series and whatever this multi frame gen crap on 50 series. Yeah buddy real frames lets go. Also nitpicked higher VRAM variants of the same cards to be able to actually launch the game to do the benchmark.
I can bet half the games would have shit the bed with so many "features" enabled.

1744746523315.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PunkX 75, Tracer_Bullet and nemo_online
YeAhx said:
I can bet half the games would have shit the bed with so many "features" enabled.
Click to expand...
Exactly, and notice how it's not even the actual FPS being compared, just 5.8x, 5.7x of the 2060 Super.

The worst part is, if anyone saw Hardware Unboxed's video, they are purposefully not giving out review units for the 8 GB cards. You won't know how full of shit their claims are until the card is launched. Hardware Unboxed asked Nvidia if they're deliberately burying the 8 GB models, and Nvidia says the target audience for 60 series budget cards aren't enthusiasts, so we don't need to do all this reviewing and stuff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nemo_online and YeAhx
Mohan997 said:
Exactly, and notice how it's not even the actual FPS being compared, just 5.8x, 5.7x of the 2060 Super.

The worst part is, if anyone saw Hardware Unboxed's video, they are purposefully not giving out review units for the 8 GB cards. You won't know how full of shit their claims are until the card is launched. Hardware Unboxed asked Nvidia if they're deliberately burying the 8 GB models, and Nvidia says the target audience for 60 series budget cards aren't enthusiasts, so we don't need to do all this reviewing and stuff.
Click to expand...
Scummy move. Sadly gamers make up a very small percentage of their profits so they don't care. AMD will probably pull the same crap if they were in NVIDIA's place but I wish AMD had more market share.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nemo_online
hellblazer33 said:
These AI Fake Frames at this price is gonna doom Nvdia why spread false adv instead of comparing raw performance.
Click to expand...

No, it won't.

People said similar things about DLSS, here we are multiple years later with AMD finally launching their proper equivalent to Nv's tech.

The average gamer does not care.

This is Nvidia testing the market for how much more people will pay for purely software tricks (hardware accelerated ofc).

The actual gains, gen on gen aren't that great I believe.

Expect much worse in the future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nemo_online
lambda said:
No, it won't.

People said similar things about DLSS, here we are multiple years later with AMD finally launching their proper equivalent to Nv's tech.

The average gamer does not care.

This is Nvidia testing the market for how much more people will pay for purely software tricks (hardware accelerated ofc).

The actual gains, gen on gen aren't that great I believe.

Expect much worse in the future.
Click to expand...
Difference is DLSS still delivers with NO fake frames. Fake frames to anyone who has gamed before is very noticeable and annoying (perhaps my personal take but I'm not alone here). Only those who are new to gaming scene wouldn't notice and thus won't care.
BTW whats with spaces between each sentences.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PunkX 75 and Tracer_Bullet
YeAhx said:
If cherry-picking had a name and APPLE was taken it would have been called NVIDIA. Notice how they made RTX 20 series be the baseline here. Like we all enabled RT on 20 series lol. Look at that 5.7/5.8x multiplier. SO MUCH FPS WOW. No way, RTX 5060 TI is going to be 5.8 times better than RTX 2060 Super in RT?. Just amazing performance. And let's not talk about Resident Evil 4 here.
Also this is what it says below the graph "1440p, Max Settings, DLSS Super Resolution and DLSS Ray Reconstruction on 50, 40, 30, and 20 Series. Frame Gen on 40 Series. Multi Frame Gen (4X Mode) on 50 Series. RTX 5060 Ti and 4060 Ti 16GB models."
Frame gen on 40 series and whatever this multi frame gen crap on 50 series. Yeah buddy real frames lets go. Also nitpicked higher VRAM variants of the same cards to be able to actually launch the game to do the benchmark.
I can bet half the games would have shit the bed with so many "features" enabled.

View attachment 231094
Click to expand...

4060ti = 2x 3060ti - yeah right. These cards arent going to use full rt, probably not rt either. And they want MFG on top with low frame rates.
What a pathetic comparison.

Nvidia = pathalogical liar. They are so ashamed of 8gb version that they are trying to hide launch reviews.

 
Last edited:
Top Bottom