Yeah I support the government in charge.
Everybody are to follow the laws of the nation and govt. as a governance entity. You are not special.
The discussion is about how effective are local policies, how policies effect people, international relations, long term affects and expected prediction of those. Not about violating the rule and law of the system for the sake of it. See voting result of other thread: What's your perception of India's future.
So you ARE saying I will do in the future? as I said. Which is a false allegation to begin with. Can't win your arguments it means I'm changing the goalposts. Lol
You are the one blindly claiming this already, why I have "say" or ""predict" this ? You already says this as an unchangeable rule.
There is no rational or logic needed to merely parrot the prevalent norms, everybody can do that.
Positive introspection and analysis helps grow better and predict real world outcome of such systems assessing the drawbacks. If one is blind to prevalent systems or are prejudiced, they will innately be incapable of doing that.
For eg., this is the real world which you are blind to:
Foxconn India revenue rises to over $20 billion, employee count up at around 80,000 (in 2024-2025)
Foxconn more than doubled its India revenue to over $20 billion in FY 2024-25, driven by iPhone production. Its workforce grew 65% to 80,000. The firm is expanding with major investments in manufacturing, AirPods, and semiconductors, anticipating continued rapid growth.
economictimes.indiatimes.com
But I'm surprised at how you dodge this question as if I'm asking to bash something personal of yours.
Prove your alliance to the our nation by saying Indian national pledge here. Then I will accept you are a patriot.
Otherwise, you are traitor or Chinese bot propagating enemy's agenda intentionally to public, by propagating disinformation that enemy is incapable and weak. Now I've serious reservations against your innate loyalty to the country.
If you do that I will agree that you are at least as equal a patriot as me. How about that ?
The experienced watchers I follow see these lapses and call it out. It's not underestimating. Whereas you and others who know nothing compared sit and argue.
Well, am not working for China, the enemy of India. Not a China bot like some who follow them so closely, get blinded and say oh with all those power they are weak.
How they very recently took 'sand bank' near Philippines without some people not even commenting against it.
What I see is their real world manufacturing and business influence, their wolf diplomacy, their military reach without fighting wars and defense advancements.
Would like to see our own country do better than that, rather than have to slog and struggle to keep existing boundaries intact all the while making big hollow statements.
Somebody have to say the emperor is without clothes. Will make a huge difference, you know ?
The lapse was he didn't see an attack as imminent. Thought China wouldn't do such a thing.
"gullible Indians who misjudged enemy as weak or ignorable." was part of my comment you purposefully ignored.
My comment in this whole thread is about this gullibility which you are still propagating.
Whatever comes out will be on Trump's terms not the CCP because he's the customer.
Except that Trump's terms changes as per his whims and fancies without any basic principles. International trade and politics does not work like that. Most probably, China will negotiate and show the diplomacy to USA when it's needed.
Still like and preferred Trump's ideas, but his execution methods are not up to the mark. Have mentioned this earlier, seems Vivek Ramaswamy sensed this on time and saved himself from the quagmire.
Point was China was an unprovoked attack.
That is how wars work especially when powerful sense the weakness of other party.
Expects Indian action to Pak will be at unexpected time but precise surpise attack, not sudden unpreparted reaction.
Currently Pak have nothing much to lose, India have lot of value to lose economically and have to face pressure in international relations lacking dependable friends.
US intent was to deter. East Pakistan operations had already commenced and they had to do whatever little to support their ally.
Big difference. Yet you continue to make a false equivalence.
Except that USA's ally then was not India, but Pak.
Russia's ally was India at that time (though it's being doubtful now).
So the Americans got there after meaning too late and achieved nothing.
On 6 and 13 December, the Soviet Navy dispatched two groups of cruisers and destroyers from Vladivostok they trailed US Task Force 74 into the Indian Ocean from 18 December 1971 until 7 January 1972. The Soviets also had a nuclear submarine to help ward off the threat posed by the USS Enterprise task force in the Indian Ocean.
President Nixon spoke with the USSR General Secretary Leonid Brezhnev on a hotline on 10 December, where Nixon reportedly urged Brezhnev to restrain India as he quoted: "in the strongest possible terms to restrain India with which ... you [Brezhnev] have great influence and for whose actions you must share responsibility."
There is also another flaw in your reasoning which is equating the US view of India from the 70s with the USof today. Are you really this ignorant?
After the war:
A 2019 study argues "that Nixon and Kissinger routinely demonstrated psychological biases that led them to overestimate the likelihood of West Pakistani victory" in the war, and that they overestimated "the importance of the crisis to broader U.S. policy. The evidence fails to support Nixon and Kissinger's own framing of the 1971 crisis as a contest between cool-headed realpolitik and idealistic humanitarianism, and instead shows that Kissinger and Nixon's policy decisions harmed their stated goals because of repeated decision-making errors.
So, here we are.
Whereas there is no change in the CCPs position about the border since 62. It endures to the present day when you realise their rhetoric during the '20 standoff wasn't very different to what they said in '62.
I know this better than you. That is the difference.
In fact I would think of that standoff as us giving China the India test.
Also consider this:
China needs strategic assets in Bangladesh at all costs.
www.india.com
(click to enlarge) Since the 2020 clashes between Chinese and Indian troops in the Galwan Valley in the disputed Ladakh region, China has significantly
geopoliticalfutures.com
OPED By Guest Author Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury During his recent China trip, Muhammad Yunus, head of the interim government in Bangladesh, sparked controversy by stating that Bangladesh remains the “only guardian” of the ocean [Indian Ocean] as the seven northeastern states of India are...
www.eurasiantimes.com
Whereas in China it will be the common man.
How the hell can you equate the two?
DOGE is a small symptom. I think employement levels in USA is far low now irrespective of DOGE. After all, people those lost job in DOGE are not diplomats, rather mostly just low end govt. jobs for common man.
So again tell me why China isn't embargoing India?
Who with their sanity will embargo when one get billions of US$ from your enemy ? Strange thinking. Rather kneecap the enemy by making them pay more.
Now with 26% participation in enemy's local manufacturing China getting more money ?
Question you should be asking yourself is why India is incapable of doing all this ourselves or working with USA the best phriend, than depending on enemy China. Then you will think a lot and get lots and lots of answers.
You can have the opposition's opinion on that
Leave alone opposition, Trump's own party members are on slippery slope now.
Yes and its blind as I said to another member here who is only interested in business.
Because our interest is betterment of India, not betterment of USA nor China.
How fortunate to have a president with eyes wide open for a change.
His eyes are open, but his actions are not in tandem with his thoughts. Thats the problem.
The provision is intended to provide relief to businesses for two years as they rework their supply chains, the White House said.
Two years is lot of time for China to rework it's strategy and shows how shallow was his plan execution without enough thought.
Damn sure there will be more tariff changes to come. In the end, let's hope it does not end up like throwing political dust at USA's voter's eyes.
How he is forcing an irreversible change which is decoupling from China. Absolutely means it. Forcing supply chains to reconfigure away from China.
Am only afraid he is helping China spread it's tentancles far and wide.
And I can't see our relations improving with Canada's politicians are so dependent on the Khalistani votebank.
Khalistani supporters failed miserably.
Canadian conservatives indeed have to reinvent themselves for better.
