You earlier already admitted you always bet on the house. It's pattern quite easy to recognize, having seen it for enough time.
Yeah I support the government in charge.
It was about you changing goal posts as per ruling system's alignment, not about China or Mexico.
So you ARE saying I will do in the future? as I said. Which is a false allegation to begin with. Can't win your arguments it means I'm changing the goalposts. Lol
Anyways, China straight told USA to pause tariff before talks. They are realigning their business.
Mexico is just a vassal of USA, things will change once DTrump is out.
See how USA rate Trump now, from Fox's mouth (bad!):
https://www.foxnews.com/official-polls/fox-news-poll-first-100-days-president-trumps-second-term
The effects haven't kicked in yet
That article simply says about how China is re-aligning it's business. not about their weakness.
Kneecap side is obviously correct, as a enemy country China is doing what an enemy would.
So it's about China blocking India as stated if worse isn't possible. The title is correct as is the point of the article which you are the only one disputing.
But underestimating the enemy from within the country makes you worse informant.
See below for more
As an Indian one do not to respond to random person on internet about my patriotism.
I find asking to prove it is your mere failure to accept the facts and trying to deflect the questions alleging other as anti-national. Shameful behavior.
Nah, it's your inability to call a spade a spade. I don't have this problem because I've followed China long enough to know their nature and call it out loud & often.
But I'm surprised at how you dodge this question as if I'm asking to bash something personal of yours.
It was mentioned earlier, a right person will not underestimate their enemy. You are knowingly or unknowingly underestimating China and that's what the whole comments here are about. To present your enemy as weak when they are quite dangerous, is either symptom of a traitor or a person too naive to talk about all this.
I'm quoting China watchers. It's not underestimating. It's pointing out weaknesses that they can deduce as a result of a long time observing the CCPs behaviour. And realise they have to do this because of the CCP's ZERO transparency.
These people have their own platform and not held back by the msm. They can speak freely and explain their reasoning.
eg. and this is just one. Over a hundred senior PLA officers purged. Because clearly these people disagree with the CCP. So they get shunted out for corruption.
The larger point is the CCP isn't sure of the PLAs loyalty. Will they follow orders. Because you have political commissars that can overrule military for political reasons which make no military sense.
The experienced watchers I follow see these lapses and call it out. It's not underestimating. Whereas you and others who know nothing compared sit and argue.
The enemy together with gullible Indians who misjudged enemy as weak or ignorable.
When did Nehru say China was weak?
The lapse was he didn't see an attack as imminent. Thought China wouldn't do such a thing. China before Mao would not. Mao changed everything. An upper class like Nehru couldn't see what a lowly thug Mao was who in '67 started a border clash with their erstwhile iron brother the Soviets.
The west discovered what China was about ten years ago. We learnt about them over fifty years ago. The Tibetans even earlier.
I've given you two more examples where people didn't understand the threat posed by China under the CCP.
The Soviets and the collective west.
Lol. on live video, the CCP team on video told Trump team no discussion about tariff took place and they will only talk once tariff is paused. Either you didn't see it or are acting as if you didn't see it.
Whatever comes out will be on Trump's terms not the CCP because he's the customer. Their commerce minister has already stated this in the simplest layman's terms.
As I already told you. Why is this so hard to see. Every country knows it. Only the CCP pretends it does not and plays these silly games that you fall for. The CCP has its back to the wall. How long for is upto them.
USA sent nuclear fighter ship, they couldn't attack because Russians put them in the place they deserved.
China attacked because they knew we were weak and gullible. That should not be repeated.
Point was China was an unprovoked attack. US intent was to deter. East Pakistan operations had already commenced and they had to do whatever little to support their ally.
Big difference. Yet you continue to make a false equivalence.
From 18 December 1971 to 7 January 1972, the Soviet Navy trailed the American fleet throughout the Indian Ocean.
Note the date. The war ended two days earlier on Dec 16 with Niazi's surrender.
So the Americans got there after meaning too late and achieved nothing.
There is also another flaw in your reasoning which is equating the US view of India from the 70s with the USof today. Are you really this ignorant?
Whereas there is no change in the CCPs position about the border since 62. It endures to the present day when you realise their rhetoric during the '20 standoff wasn't very different to what they said in '62. Trying to imply any future conflict will end with the same result as back then which is total nonsense.
If they could push us around they would have done it long ago. They know today they are no match for us in the mountains. Our actions since Doklam have demonstrated this confidence. In fact I would think of that standoff as us giving China the India test. Every army chief since VK Singh has been given the China test but not Bipin Rawat.
Israel have been comparatively friendly with India even earlier.
You still haven't got it after clearly explaining and that's on you.
See what DOGE is doing to USA's employment rate.
Now there are weekly protests almost everywhere.
what a weird comparison this is.lol
Chinese will be unemployed in ever increasing numbers due to tariffs
And you blame DOGE for doing the same to the US. Completely misunderstanding what DOGE is even doing in the first place.
Trimming the fat. Its laid off government employees protesting. Whereas in China it will be the common man.
How the hell can you equate the two?
It matters when your trade deficit with enemy is higher than that of your friend.
And why your even trading with your biggest enemy, such powerful country as yours shouldn't be doing it ?
So again tell me why China isn't embargoing India? Such obvious leverage and they are too dumb to see this or more likely afraid.
If the plan is to kneecap India then embargo is the way. The reason they haven't done it is because your argument is wrong to begin with.
The US has the same problem. It's much larger and has to do something to fix it.
Why India needs China then ? Even after embargoing, huge trade deficit ?
No there won't be a huge deficit after embargo and I'm amazed you don't see this.
No deficit if there is embargo.
China will have cutoff it's nose to spite it's face. China's intent is to kneecap India but cannot embargo India?
Now do you get it? Reversing the argument like you have doesn't work.
Every single business interest with common sense.
You can have the opposition's opinion on that
Well, business in America is business.
Yes and its blind as I said to another member here who is only interested in business. How fortunate to have a president with eyes wide open for a change.
Let's see how the show ends. Probably, like this with tail in the groove:
Trump set to ease tariff impact on US car makers
The president is due to hold a rally in Michigan, which is home to Ford, General Motors and Stellantis.
www.bbc.com
Here's the para you missed
The provision is intended to provide relief to businesses for two years as they rework their supply chains, the White House said.
Temporary. OK. Not surrender as you are trying to make it look. So not a u- turn. Favourite word for the opposition.
I would call this tweaking and I've already said this would happen. If it's not working try something else, in this case ease off for a while and then come back with tariffs again.
Can you see how he is whipping corporate America's ass here?
How he is forcing an irreversible change which is decoupling from China. Absolutely means it. Forcing supply chains to reconfigure away from China.
Trump made Carney's turnaround victory possible
Mark Carney's party pull off an election win that once looked near-impossible, until the US president targeted Canada.
www.bbc.com
Not a good time to be a Canadian on the right
Not a good result though. Carney and Trump are going to be butting heads now.And I can't see our relations improving with Canada's politicians are so dependent on the Khalistani votebank.
