If it’s an F16, which most likely is, US will not be very happy about it. We don’t want to upset US, for sure, in such a situation.Does anyone have a theory or a possible explanation of why they are not speaking it out plainly?
It's not like we invited USA to give those F16s to our enemy. Since they did and now they are flying against us, do we think USA expects us to just give up fighting them? Bullsh*t! If that's the reason, I would lose all respect for this govt. But I don't think that's a probable reason.If it’s an F16, which most likely is, US will not be very happy about it. We don’t want to upset US for sure, with an evolving situation.
Video above says 5-7% of their airforceOne thing I quite can't wrap my mind head around is, why didn't they release the info on how many jets they hit?
NoneIt's understandable they are reluctant to admit the number of jets we lost if any.
And the message is conveyed to the right people.But the number of their jets we hit -- that is not going to be a secret to the enemy. They know. The enemy also knows.
No point as its easy for the other side to deny and then what do you do. Not only that will then claim the same against you.Does anyone have a theory or a possible explanation of why they are not speaking it out plainly?
Does anyone have a theory or a possible explanation of why they are not speaking it out plainly?
Any reference you can quote?Going by today's press conference though, it does seem like we've lost some aircraft.
That's not what I meant. We will obviously fight against F16, but to put it out in wild, that we fell them down, will be a dent for them.do we think USA expects us to just give up fighting them? Bullsh*t! If that's the reason, I would lose all respect for this govt. But I don't think that's a probable reason.
If F16 is lost, USA already know it, shouldn't bade well for Pak.If it’s an F16, which most likely is, US will not be very happy about it. We don’t want to upset US, for sure, in such a situation.
"We are in a combat scenario, and losses are part of combat. As for the details – what could have been lost, how many platforms – if I comment on anything, it will only benefit the adversary."Any reference you can quote?
It not us that the US will be upset at.If it’s an F16, which most likely is, US will not be very happy about it. We don’t want to upset US, for sure, in such a situation.
We definitely lost a few rafales. This quest may not have been a success if looked at from an economic pov."We are in a combat scenario, and losses are part of combat. As for the details – what could have been lost, how many platforms – if I comment on anything, it will only benefit the adversary."
Any reference you can quote?
We may never gain composure or confidence in international arena unless we win some conflicts at least, leave alone war.This quest may not have been a success if looked at from an economic pov.
We lose planes in peace time as well. Nobody loses sleep over that."We are in a combat scenario, and losses are part of combat. As for the details – what could have been lost, how many platforms – if I comment on anything, it will only benefit the adversary."
yeah but its pretty humiliating when you compare the cost of rafale with those chinese jets.We may never gain composure or confidence in international arena unless we win some conflicts at least, leave alone war.
Consider what we can gain after the war economically, than not doing a war and fail anyways.
We don't know what are damages from Pak side, including F16, Chinese jets, their nuclear facilities, etc. (Army spoke-person already said terrorist state lost few 'advanced planes', not categorically confirming those are 4th gen fighters).yeah but its pretty humiliating when you compare the cost of rafale with those chinese jets.