AIML Meet ChatGPT (Artificial Intelligence), good alternative to Google?

They did not fire 8k and rehire 8k as the thread makes it out to be.
Aren't they saying that they fired lot of HR staff, replaced those with AI bots and recruited almost same number of engineers, sales and marketing staff.
Have a doubt whether these companies are trying to exploit AI bots as a cover-up strategy to deflect something more sinister and serious in the market.
 
Pausing AI Developments Isn’t Enough. We Need to Shut it All Down

To visualize a hostile superhuman AI, don’t imagine a lifeless book-smart thinker dwelling inside the internet and sending ill-intentioned emails. Visualize an entire alien civilization, thinking at millions of times human speeds, initially confined to computers—in a world of creatures that are, from its perspective, very stupid and very slow. A sufficiently intelligent AI won’t stay confined to computers for long. In today’s world you can email DNA strings to laboratories that will produce proteins on demand, allowing an AI initially confined to the internet to build artificial life forms or bootstrap straight to postbiological molecular manufacturing.

If somebody builds a too-powerful AI, under present conditions, I expect that every single member of the human species and all biological life on Earth dies shortly thereafter
 
AI company files for bankruptcy after being exposed as 700 Indian engineers

Earlier:
AI Startup Boom Raises Questions of Exaggerated Tech Savvy
SoftBank-backed startup offers ‘human-assisted’ artificial-intelligence; current, former employees say company inflates its tech expertise
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ssslayer
Making stuff up and doubles down when challenged. Then finally admits stuff was made up and apologises :bored:


Think what the term 'AI generated content' means
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ssslayer
Is this a hot take or just pure salt from Nadella?

Sure, AI as we all have publicly access to today are all synthesizers, but isn't that a huge step towards AGI?
 
Serious question:Will this replace programmers in the future(say 5 years from now)?
at some level definitely, not the entirety of programing ofc.
Calculator example is not valid here as you need a person to run it not a second person to check if what result the calculator had given is write or wrong, when AI achieves this level of accuracy then not even a person is needed to run it it can be automated, like if AI driving achieves 100% accuracy the there no need of driver in that vehicle, same can be said in programming when AI achieves 100% accuracy in writing a program then there is no need for a programmer to examine it thus defeats the purpose of a programmer.
 
at some level definitely, not the entirety of programing ofc.
Calculator example is not valid here as you need a person to run it not a second person to check if what result the calculator had given is write or wrong, when AI achieves this level of accuracy then not even a person is needed to run it it can be automated, like if AI driving achieves 100% accuracy the there no need of driver in that vehicle, same can be said in programming when AI achieves 100% accuracy in writing a program then there is no need for a programmer to examine it thus defeats the purpose of a programmer.
if AI agent does mistake (or turns rogue) then who gets sued?