B batman Inactive Beginner Jun 30, 2009 #1 The cost of xfx 9500gt is much less than palit hd 4670. 1 GB 9500GT XFX or Palit HD 4670 512MB DDR3, which would be faster?
The cost of xfx 9500gt is much less than palit hd 4670. 1 GB 9500GT XFX or Palit HD 4670 512MB DDR3, which would be faster?
D dOm1naTOr Inactive Explorer Jun 30, 2009 #2 4670 512 DDR3 ofcourse. 4670 competes with 9600GT, and only inches behind it. 9500GT comes nowhere near, even if 1GB.
4670 512 DDR3 ofcourse. 4670 competes with 9600GT, and only inches behind it. 9500GT comes nowhere near, even if 1GB.
D deaddevil Contributor Jun 30, 2009 #3 4670, is way better than 9500 GT. One of my friends has a 9500 Gt and its no way close to a 4670 card. 9600 GT or 4670 Is a recommended buy!
4670, is way better than 9500 GT. One of my friends has a 9500 Gt and its no way close to a 4670 card. 9600 GT or 4670 Is a recommended buy!
A aasheet Inactive Contributor Jun 30, 2009 #4 4670 for sure it is a nice card similar to 9600 but needs very less power to operate
sato1986 Herald Jun 30, 2009 #7 dOm1naTOr said: 4670 512 DDR3 ofcourse. 4670 competes with 9600GT, and only inches behind it. 9500GT comes nowhere near, even if 1GB. Click to expand... +1 10chars
dOm1naTOr said: 4670 512 DDR3 ofcourse. 4670 competes with 9600GT, and only inches behind it. 9500GT comes nowhere near, even if 1GB. Click to expand... +1 10chars
D dOm1naTOr Inactive Explorer Jun 30, 2009 #8 Sapphire has killer rates in India now, after ATI's recent price cut. And u can run 4670 on any generic 400 or 450W PSU, which comes with cabby[unlike 9600GT]
Sapphire has killer rates in India now, after ATI's recent price cut. And u can run 4670 on any generic 400 or 450W PSU, which comes with cabby[unlike 9600GT]
