deathvirus_me
Explorer
U mean u could afford two 7950GX2's .. and nothing better than the 3000+ ??? u should be having a FX62 instead .. man the CPU is a hhhuuugggeeee bottleneck ...
he won it in a competition coz he is a gaming maniac(err genius)..deathvirus_me said:U mean u could afford two 7950GX2's .. and nothing better than the 3000+ ??? u should be having a FX62 instead .. man the CPU is a hhhuuugggeeee bottleneck ...
whateve_r said:^^The company hasnt even launched quad support for 7950.....If i am not mistaken that is. The second card is just lying idle in his system cause Nvidia need to release proper drivers for Quad SLi support for a 7950...Maybe i might be mistaken.
I have to mention this, Quad SLI. Seriously if you are considering picking up two of the GX2's, then please don't! Quad SLI is not ready and I'm honestly not sure if it ever will be. We tried most possible software, yet in almost any case the game reverted back to utilizing one GPU, there was one exception, which was the title F.E.A.R and it was showing a good 20% additional performance at a pretty high resolution of 1920x1200. Sure it'd be best to test software on a spanking new 30" 2560x1600 screen .. but realistically ? Who has one let alone can afford it ? Seriously, 20% for another 650 bucks? Come on, no way. Don't bet on Quad SLI as it's a waste of money at this time. NVIDIA knows this and is only selling Quad SLI to system builders.
whateve_r said:
If it is a venice and if your mobo and all overclocks, well, if you just overclock your cpu to 2.6ghz or more than as such your cpu shouldn't be that much of a bottleneck for any game, and 6months-1yr down the line you can consider conroe.