Lmao. Did you even bother to check Google before posting such nonsense? Hindenburg Research was founded in 2017. Theranos had been exposed as scam in 2015. This is what you guys sound like:Among all the companies in the world, why was Adani Group the only one that was highlighted. There are some so many other companies too. I am sure, he would have pissed someone and they decided to turn on him. The other side of the coin is - ahem ahem, Hinderburg really came to help the entire world like it has been doing so all there years. I wonder why it never reported about Theranos and other scams that were public.
This is what modern Information warfare looks like. They know they can take down an entire Country by taking down one organization. And they can always rely on gullible people (especially those who think they are smart) to carry on their war for them. Listen to what @blr_p is saying.
Couldn't have put it better.Lmao. Did you even bother to check Google before posting such nonsense? Hindenburg Research was founded in 2017. Theranos had been exposed as scam in 2015. This is what you guys sound like:
If someone can take down entire country by taking down one organization then whose fault is that? Certainly not that of whistleblowers. The current administration has handed over the country to A[x]anis on silver platter. Focus on that instead of getting caught up in BS whatsapp forwards.
Love your sarcasm.Lmao. Did you even bother to check Google before posting such nonsense? Hindenburg Research was founded in 2017. Theranos had been exposed as scam in 2015. This is what you guys sound like:
Plus they have taken big loans from Key PSU banks.My really only big concern is Adani business is more focused on natural resources, infrastructure, airport, minning etc and they're backbone of any nation.
Yes, basically this is our taxed money and look at the corporate tax chart.Plus they have taken big loans from Key PSU banks.
Mod edit: Please avoid personal attacksJab baap pehelwan, gadda meherbaan.
Actually Debt of Adani groups is 61% from Foreign and from Open market(Private Banks plus Bonds). PSU banks are only 25%. DII, Debt Market and Private banks wouldn't give money without due dilligence. Plus, all debt is securd by Cash earning assets.
Adani are asset rich companies just like any global infra comapnies. And infra is mostly funded by debts.
A few more points to be noted are,
1. Adani assets are not only in India. They have assets in Australia, Israel etc. Most notably Haifa port of Israel.
2. All of Adani projects, assets are obtained via auction. No asset is on allotment basis or shady behind the door deals. Projects are won on merit and paying competitive price.
3. Global giant like Total wouldn't have bought 25% in any venture without due dilligence or at inflated prices.
Projects were awarded by way of transparent process/Bidding. That's all is out there.A company with no experience of managing airlines or airports was awarded half a dozen airport projects because of merit. Right.
That is point is in context of liquidity of Adani and risk of lenders. If loans secured against assets, lenders are relatively safe. Many are concerned with collateral damage to economy via banks, secured debt suggests there might be very little damage.They're asset rich because of corruption. What kind of circular logic is to point at those same assets and say Adani is clean because they have assets.
Sorry but I don't agree. There are ways to manipulate. And those in power can always control. Albeit in some cases like Morbi bridge, it was sheer preferential treatment.Projects were awarded by way of transparent process/Bidding. That's all is out there.
What you're suggesting is even if Adani does turn out to be the biggest scammer in India, it still won't be a problem because he is honest enough to not manipulate value of his assets?That is point is in context of liquidity of Adani and risk of lenders. If loans secured against assets, lenders are relatively safe. Many are concerned with collateral damage to economy via banks, secured debt suggests there might be very little damage.