AIEEE 2011 Paper got LEAKED

Status
Not open for further replies.

comp@ddict

Galvanizer
...and I was a victim

add 40C temperature in New Delhi and the inviligator giving the paper late(but taking it on time, ofcourse), it was a bad experience.
 
Had to sit at the examination centre ground for 3 hrs doing nothing, that too in the sun :@

They didnt allowed us to go out.

Overall the paper was good :)
 
That's bad. So all folks were asked to sit inside for all that time? I wonder how an online exam paper can get leaked. Wasn't it online?
 
agantuk said:
That's bad. So all folks were asked to sit inside for all that time? I wonder how an online exam paper can get leaked. Wasn't it online?
Nope... only 1lac candidate gave online.. rest was offline..

Fortunately we were not bound to stay there and returned home..

However worse thing was that during exam there was a power cut and we gave exam at 40c without a fan

Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk
 
^^ wow man u really got boiled.

i was angry cuz our stupid invigilator gave our paper only when the bell rang(other classes started solving), and 10 minutes later, she asks the teached from the adjacent class who says

"Humare bachche toh likhne shuru kar diye"

and we sit dumbstruck

worse, she collected it nick on time. Oh man, 10 minutes and I had 2 more questions
 
Allegedly, those leaked papers were being sold at about 6 lakhs in the market. UP & Bihar connection has been found related to his case.

I can now blame my poor marks in AIEEE due to this frustrating delay.
 
^^

They usually make 3 sets. 2x are kept for contingencies similar to what occurred yesterday.
 
I knew this coming:

Petition in SC seeks stay on re-conduct of AIEEE

NEW DELHI: A petition has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking a stay on the government's decision to re-conduct the All India Engineering Entrance Examination (AIEEE) for candidates who could not appear in the May 1 test due to question paper leak.

The petition, filed by former Professor A P Sinha of NIT Jamshedpur, has appealed against a Delhi High Court order which issued notices to the government but refused to stay its decision to re-conduct the AIEEE on May 11.

"As per the scheme of the examination, two separate examinations are not envisaged at all for a single merit list based on performances. Deviations leave the process illegal, unjust, unconstitutional, arbitrary and clearly against fundamental rights of equality of all the candidates," the petition said.

The main plea before the High Court was for the cancellation of the examination held on May 1 and conducting it afresh in near future providing equal opportunity to each and every candidate.

The petitioner had sought stay on the government's notification dated May 2 for holding the AIEEE on May 11 for the candidates who could not take it on May 1 due to confusion arising out of the leakage of the question paper.

As the High Court did not stay the rescheduled exam, the petitioner approached the apex court contending that "High Court's decision results into effectively disallowing the main petition rendering the same as infructuous".

The petitioner contended that the government is "conducting two AIEEE 2011 exams under two very different conditions -- one in adverse and disadvantageous condition, marked by chaos in which 97 per cent of the total candidates appeared, while only 3 per cent candidates are allowed to appear on May 11 in an undue advantageous positions".

"This will certainly lead to conditions in which it can never produce a just, fair, bonafide and legally sustainable merit list of rankings and thereby may open a floodgate of future litigations and challenges," the petition said.
 
comp@ddict said:
I cant give the exam again. My first went good, what if the 2nd one goes bad? It can spoil everything
Same here the first one went really good, i don't want to give it again :@
 
Status
Not open for further replies.