AM5 and Ryzen 7000 News
- Thread starter enthusiast29
- Start date
Psycho_McCrazy
Galvanizer
why i feel zen4 doesn't provide value at this time... early adopter are mostly serve as lab-rat for bug fixing.
All these reviews hardly matter in real life real life scenario.
All these reviews hardly matter in real life real life scenario.
lol exactly , i quoted as well and then realised
Last edited:
desiibond
Keymaster
7600X is going to be a massive hit. Bloody thing competes with 12700K
Look at 7950X @65W TDP benchmarks on tomshardware.
TinTinSnowy
Herald
desiibond
Keymaster
not going to speculate over something that is not released. This discussion is for another day.
burntwingzZz
Innovator
zibalingz
Forerunner
mdcomputers prices. could be placeholder
mdcomputers.in
Buy AMD Ryzen 7000 Series Desktop Processor | Mdcomputers.in
AMD Ryzen™ 7000 Series processors are a gaming powerhouse with high-performance “Zen 4” cores. With up to 16 cores, 32 threads, boost clocks of up to 5.7GHz and up to 80MB of cache, AMD Ryzen 7000 Series processors deliver game changing performance.
mdcomputers.in
Last edited:
7959x will come under 60k in the next 3 months.mdcomputers prices. could be placeholder
Buy AMD Ryzen 7000 Series Desktop Processor | Mdcomputers.in
AMD Ryzen™ 7000 Series processors are a gaming powerhouse with high-performance “Zen 4” cores. With up to 16 cores, 32 threads, boost clocks of up to 5.7GHz and up to 80MB of cache, AMD Ryzen 7000 Series processors deliver game changing performance.
That's not what I meant. Check the gamer Nexus review. Blender test took more power on 7950 with respect to work it did.
Yeah, Lisa lied about the efficiency. Except for specific corner cases, out of the many reviews I read, efficiency didn't seem to be a strong point of AM5.
I am glad I waited, now waiting for the 13th gen.
One of the YT videos (I guess Moores Law Is Dead or LevelOneTechs channel) IIRC mentioned that desktop variants of Zen4 are not efficient unless you run in eco mode. Zen4 will excel in laptop/datacenter variants.
Psycho_McCrazy
Galvanizer
I think that they had to push them well beyond their sweet spot, just like Intel has been doing over the past three or four generations.
Still, as far as I can interpret, they're better than 12900K in Efficiency, and would perhaps be even better than 13000 series as Raptor Lake is nothing but a clocked and cache enlarged Alder....
Yeah, that was probably part of Zen 3.5 ( I mean the laptop processors 6000 series ). And yeah, people will have to learn new things : like 95 C, if heatsink is not installed properly lower performance is the main symptom, and sometimes overclock consumes less power than stock
True, but 12900K was an outlier in Alder Lake efficiency, other chips are much better. And millionaires who buy 12900K don't care. The disappointing stuff with AM5 is that relatively Aam Aadmi chips like 7600X are getting inefficient.