CPU/Mobo AMD Bulldozer Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Now that is a better overclock than 4.6GHz, something to talk about.

5.1GHz is great on air, for an ES. I'm wondering how much the final chips on stock cooler would be able to do.
 
If the stock clock is really in the late 3s and Turbo somewhere in the mid-4s, we should be seeing 5 GHz overclocks minimum.
 
Parix said:
hopefully.. these clock speed increases would also translate into better single threaded performance.
Click to expand...
This is something I am soo uncertain, how do we define single-threaded for AMD now, 1 module or 1 core per module. Does AMD count their processor as a 4 module one(like intel's 4 core 8 thread thanks to HT) or 8 core one.

This high clocks thing is making me jumpy, cause in the end, when a commoner reads 3.8GHz AMD processor barely competing with INTEL's 2.8GHz processor(god forbid that happens), they would say MEH to AMD, since they wont be knowing AMD's architecture is meant to work at high frequencies, and scale to high frequencies, much like NetBurst.
 
true.. Bulldozer is just a modification of HT, i think AMD call it a "strong thread' or "Two strong threads".so it is still modular, so i guess it would be performance of the module.
 
Direct comparision, seems pretty legit to me. Only downer is AMD's BD sucks at Super and Hyper Pi.

News des 8. Juli 2011 | 3DCenter.org

AMD Bulldozer 8C@3.2 GHz (4.2 GHz TC) Core i7-2600K + 4C HT@3.4 GHz (3.8 GHz TM)

x264 Benchmark, Pass 1 136.29 fps 102.14 fps ( computer base )

x264 Benchmark, Pass 2 45.40 fps 36.25 fps ( computer base )

SuperPI 1M 19.500 sec 10.381 sec ( Ocaholic )

Cinebench R10 24 434 Pts. 22 821 Pts. ( Au-Ja! )

3DMark11 Performance 6265 3DMarks 5721 3DMarks ( Tom's Hardware )

Fritz Chess Benchmark 14 197 kn / sec 13 125 kn / sec ( Tom's Hardware )
 
so what kind of performance are we looking at here?
will bd blow the competition straight out of the water? (at its price point, of course)
or will it fizzle out?
 
Fingers crossed., i am so damn excited for the bulldozer and HD 7000 , and yes the current leaks do look authentic, hoping the b3 stepping would be more better, read the same on sofpedia for a price point of 15k INR .... ATM that looks like a kikass performance but too early to say , :cool2:
 
comp@ddict said:
Direct comparision, seems pretty legit to me. Only downer is AMD's BD sucks at Super and Hyper Pi.

News des 8. Juli 2011 | 3DCenter.org

AMD Bulldozer 8C@3.2 GHz (4.2 GHz TC) Core i7-2600K + 4C HT@3.4 GHz (3.8 GHz TM)

x264 Benchmark, Pass 1 136.29 fps 102.14 fps ( computer base )

x264 Benchmark, Pass 2 45.40 fps 36.25 fps ( computer base )

SuperPI 1M 19.500 sec 10.381 sec ( Ocaholic )

Cinebench R10 24 434 Pts. 22 821 Pts. ( Au-Ja! )

3DMark11 Performance 6265 3DMarks 5721 3DMarks ( Tom's Hardware )

Fritz Chess Benchmark 14 197 kn / sec 13 125 kn / sec ( Tom's Hardware )
Click to expand...

I think you forgot to update the table properly and did not insert the pipe. Only figures for the red chip are visible...!
 
Yeah, with all the delay, i see the wait is worth it. for some reason we like to see the underdog win .

--- Updated Post - Automerged ---

just imagine, bulldozer matching i7 990x, wonder How INTEL would respond to dat :ohyeah: ,
 
pratz said:
Yeah, with all the delay, i see the wait is worth it. for some reason we like to see the underdog win .

--- Updated Post - Automerged ---

just imagine, bulldozer matching i7 990x, wonder How INTEL would respond to dat :ohyeah: ,
Click to expand...
Sandy Bridge E, obviously.
 
^^Lol. Ivy Bridge not even able to surpassSB (acc to the early benchmarks leak). Ib is more of a die shrink with 3d transistors than a complete new approach.

Plus IB focuses more on graphics as Intel will release better IGP in it.
 
^^Lol. Ivy Bridge not even able to surpassSB (acc to the early benchmarks leak).
Click to expand...

I don't think I can believe those benchmarks, since we are only what A YEAR away from it's release. Whereas, these BD leaks, (not the ones happening 1-2 months ago), the most recent ones, are REAL, we are close to launch after all, maybe 1-2 months.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom